Efeito da hélice tríplice em desempenho de inovação Outros Idiomas

ID:
10578
Resumo:
A inovação está relacionada ao crescimento das economias e das empresas, e em um ambiente em mudança como o presente, é apresentado como uma ferramenta fundamental para a vantagem competitiva. Esta pesquisa visa analisar a relação entre a capacidade de inovação das empresas e a obtenção da mesma informação por meio da cooperação com concorrentes, fornecedores, universidades e outras instituições públicas (Hélice Tríplice). Primeiro, nós desenvolvemos uma revisão da literatura sobre conceitos relacionados e, em seguida, por meio do método de equações estruturais, um modelo para responder e aceitar a hipótese proposta que destaca a relação entre o desempenho inovador das empresas e informações obtidas a partir da Hélice Tríplice. A pesquisa é realizada com uma amostra de empresas espanholas pesquisadas pelo Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE), durante os anos 2008-2010.
Citação ABNT:
LUENGO, M. J.; OBESO, M. El efecto de la tríple hélice en los resultados de innovación. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 53, n. 4, p. 388-399, 2013.
Citação APA:
Luengo, M. J., & Obeso, M. (2013). El efecto de la tríple hélice en los resultados de innovación. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(4), 388-399.
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/10578/efeito-da-helice-triplice-em-desempenho-de-inovacao/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Espanhol
Referências:
ACEVEDO, R. Factores que inciden en la competencia docente universitaria. 2003. Tesis de Doctoral ed. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 2003.

AHUJA, G; KATILA, R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, v. 22, n. 3, p. 197-220, 2001.

AHUJA, G; KATILA, R. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyn cratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, v. 25, n. 8-9, p. 887-907, 2004.

AHUJA, G; LAMPERT, C. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 6-7, p. 521-543, 2001.

AUSTIN, J; CALDERON, R. Theorical and technical contributions to structural equations modelling: an updated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, v. 3, n. 2, p. 105-125, 1996.

BARBIERI, J; VASCONCELOS, I; ANDREASSI, T; VASCONCELOS, F. Inovação e sustentabilidade: novos modelos e proposições. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 50, n. 2, p. 146-154 , 2010.

BARRET, P. Structural equation modeling: adjudging model fit. Science Direct. Personality and Individual Differences, v. 42, n. 5, p. 815-824, 2006.

BATISTA FOGUET, J; COENDERS GALLART, G. Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Cuadernos de Estadística 6 ed. Madrid, España: La Muralla, 2000.

BENTLER, P; BONNET, D. Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, v. 88, n. 3, p. 588-606, 1980.

BENTLER, P. Multivariate analysis with latent variables: causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 31, p. 419-456, 1980.

BIZQUERRA, R. Introducción conceptual al análisis multivariante. Un enfoque informático con los paquetes SPSS-X, BMDP, LISREL y SPAD. Barcelona: PPU, 1989.

BOLDRIN, M; CORREA-ALLAMAND, J; LEVINE, D; ORGANHI, C. Competition and innovation. Cato Papers on Public Policy, v. 1, p. 2-62, 2011.

BOLLEN, K. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1989.

BROWNE, M; CUDECK, R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En: K. Bollen & J. Long, edits. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, California: Sage, p. 136-162, 1993.

BROWNE, M; MELS, G. RAMONA user´s guide. Ohio: department of Psychology, Ohio State University, 1992.

BRUNEEL, J; D´ESTE, P; NEELY, A; SALTER, A. The search for talent and technology: Examining the Attitudes of EPSRC Industrial Collaborators towards Universities. Londres: Advanced Institute of Management Research, 2009.

CAMISÓN, C; VILLAR-LÓPEZ, A. Análisis del papel mediador de las capacidades de innovación tecnológica en la relación entre la forma organizativa flexible y el desempeño organizativo. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, v. 13, n. 45, p. 115-144, 2010.

CHEN, D; DALHMAN, C. Knowledge and development: a cross-section approach. World Bank Policy Research, p. Working paper. 3366, 2004.

CRESPI, G; CRISCUOLO, C; HASKEL, J. Productivity, exporting and the learning-by-exporting hypothesis: Direct evidence from UK Firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, v. 41, n. 2, p. 619-637, 2008.

DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555-590, 1991.

DÍAZ DÍAZ, N; AGUIAR DÍAZ, I; DE SAÁ PÉREZ, P. El conocimiento organizativo tecnológico y la capacidad de innovación. Evidencia para la empresa industrial española. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, v. 27, p. 33-60, 2006.

DÍAZ, G; BEERLI, G. El proceso de adopción de la conducta de reciclado: modelos explicativos y variables modeladoras. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, v. 28, p. 55-86, 2006.

DILLON, W; KUMAR, A; MULANI, N. Offending estimates in covariance structure analysis: comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood cases. Psychological Bulletin, v. 101, n. 1, p. 126-135, 1987.

ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science & Public Policy, v. 25, n. 3, p. 195-203, 1998.

ETZKOWITZ, H. Networks of innovation: Science, technology and development in the Triple Helix Era. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, v. 1, n. 1, p. 7-20, 2002.

FLORICEL, S; MICHELA, J; GEORGE, M. Resource feedbacks for continuous innovation: the articulation of firm, university and government roles. Copenhagen, Dinamarca, Summer Conference, Copenhagen Business School (CBS), 2009.

FUENTES, A. Los modelos causales en la investigación del rendimiento académico. Gijón, España, III Seminario sobre Modelos de Investigación Educativa, 1985.

GARCÍA-VEGA, M; LÓPEZ, A. Determinants of abandoning innovative activities: evidence from Spanish Firms. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, v. 13, n. 45, p. 69-92, 2010.

GARDAKER, G; AHMED, P; GRAHAM, G. An integrated response towards the pursuit of fast time to market of NPD in European manufacturing organizations. European Business Review, v. 98, n. 3, p. 172-177, 1998.

GASSMANN, O; ENKEL, E; CHESBROUGH, H. The future of open innovation. R&D Management, v. 40, n. 3, p. 213-221, 2010.

GATIGNON, H; XUEREB, J. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 34, n. 1, p. 77-79, 1997.

GONZÁLEZ DE LA FE, T. El modelo de Triple Hélice de relaciones Universidad, industria y Gobierno: un análisis crítico. ARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura,v. CLXXXV, n. 738, p. 739-755, 2009.

HAGEDOORN, J. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 4, p. 477-492, 2002.

HAYDUK, L. LISREL issues, debates and strategies. Baltimore: JHU Press, 1996.

HOELTER, J. The analysis of covariance structures: goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, v. 11, n. 3, p. 325-344, 1983.

HU, L; BENTLER, P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-55, 1999.

JAMES, L; MULAIK, S; BRETT, J. Causal analysis: assumptions, models and data. Beberly Hills: Sage-Johns Hopkings University Press, 1982.

JÖRESKOG, K. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelhood factor analysis with addendum. En: K. J. &. D. Sörbom, ed. Advances in factor analysis and structural equation model. Cambridge: Abt Books, 1979.

LAURSEN, K; SALTER, A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, v. 27, n. 2, p. 131-150, 2006.

MANSFIELD, E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1-12, 1991.

MARSH, H; HOCEVAR, D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, v. 97, n. 3, p. 562-582, 1985.

MARTIN, B; TANG, P. The benefits from publicly funded research. SPRU Electronic Working paper, v. 41, 2007.

MIRANDA, E; FIGUEIREDO, P. Dinâmica da acumulaçao de capacidades inovadoras: evidências de empresas de software no Rio de janeiro e em Sao Paulo. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 50, n. 1, p. 75-93, 2010.

MULAIK, S; JAMES, L.R; VAN ALSTINE, J; BENNETT, N; LIND, S; STILWELL, C. Evaluation of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, v. 105, n. 3, p. 430-445, 1989.

NALEBUFF, b; BRANDENBURGER, A. Coopetition kooperativ konkurrieren. Frankfurt, Mit der Spieltheorie zum Unternehmenserfolg, 1996.

NICKELL, S. Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, v. 104, n. 4, p. 724-746, 1996.

NORDBERG, M; CAMPBELL, A; VERBEKE, A. Using customer relationships to acquire technological innovation: a value-chain analysis of supplier contracts with scientific research institutions. Journal of Business Research, v. 56, n. 9, p. 711-719, 2003.

NUNNALLY, J. Physhometric theory. 2ª ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

OKADA, Y. Competition and productivity in Japanese manufacturing industry. NBER Working paper, Issue no. 11540, 2005.

PAGE, A. Hacia un modelo causal del rendimiento académico. Madrid: CIDE, 1990.

QUINTANA, C.; BENAVIDES, A. Concentraciones territoriales, alianzas estratégicas e innovación. Un enfoque de capacidades dinámicas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, v. 10, n. 30, p. 5-37, 2007.

QUINTANA, C.; BENAVIDES, A. Relación tecnológica en los acuerdos de cooperación empresarial y generación de innovaciones. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, v. 13, n. 45, p. 43-68, 2010.

ROOS, G; PIKE, S. The relationship between University research and firm innovation. En: E. Evans, R. Burritt & J. Guthrie, edits. Bridging the gap between academic accounting research and professional practice. s.l.:The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and Centre for Accounting, Governance and Sustainability, University of South Australia, p. 31-50, 2011.

ROSENKOPF, L; NERKAR, A. Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, v. 22, n. 4, p. 287-306, 2001.

RUIZ, M; PARDO, A; SAN MARTIN, R. Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, v. 31, n. 1, p. 34-45, 2010.

SAKAIYA, T. The knowledge value revolution or a History of the future. Tokio: Kodansha, 1991.

SAWHNEY, M; WOLCOTT, R; ARRONIZ, I. The different ways for companies to innovate. Sloan Management Review, v. 47, n. 3, p. 28-34, 2006.

SCHUMACKER, R; LOMAX, R. A begginer’s guide to structural equation modeling. 2 ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Eribaum Soociates, 2004.

STEIGER, J; SHAPIRO, A; BROWNE, M. On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, v. 50, n. 3, p. 253-263, 1985.

STEIGER, J. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, v. 25, n. 2, p. 173-180, 1990.

STUART, T; HOANG, H; HYBELS, R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 315-349, 1999.

TEECE, D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 13, p. 1319-1350, 2007.

TIJSSEN, R. Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 4, p. 509-526, 2002.

TOOLE, A. The impact of federally funded basic research on industrial innovation: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Standford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Issue SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 98-8, 1999.

VASCONCELOS, G; WILKINSON, J; AMÂNCIO, R. Empreendedorismo, inovaçao e redes: uma nova abordagem. RAE-eletrônica, v. 7, n. 1, 2008. Disponible en: http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/artigos/10.1590_ S1676-56482008000100008.pdf. Acesso en 20.12.2012.

VEUGELERS, R; CASSIMAN, B. Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, v. 28, n. 1, p. 63-80, 1999.

VIALE, R; GHIGLIONE, B. The Triple Helix model: a tool for the study o European Regional Socio Economic Systems. The IPTS Report, European Commission, v. 29, 1998.

WANG, L; FAN, X; WILSON, V. Effects of nonnormal data on parameter estimates for a model with lateng and manifiest variables: an empirical study. Structural Equation Modeling, v. 3, n. 3, p. 228-247, 1996.

WANG, P. Popular concepts beyond organizations: exploring new dimensions of information technology innovations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 10, n. 2, p. 1-30, 2009.

WHEATON, B; MUTHÉN, B; ALWIN, D; SUMMERS, G. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. En: D. Heise, ed. Sociological Methodology. s.l., p. 84-136, 1977.

WILLIAMS, L; COTE, J; BUCKLEY, M. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artefact?. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 3, n. 74, p. 462-488, 1989.

ZHAO, H; TONG, X; WONG, P; ZHU, J. Types of technology sourcing and innovative capability: an exploratory study of Singapore manufacturing firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, v. 16, n. 2, p. 209-224, 2005.