Governança corporativa e gestão socialmente responsável em empresas estatais Outros Idiomas

ID:
2434
Resumo:
A globalização, entre outros eventos, trouxe para o setor produtivo de domínio
público a necessidade de alguns ajustes e de reestruturação para poder continuar
justificando a atuação do Estado na economia. Assim, nos últimos anos passou-se a
considerar que a atuação das empresas estatais deve ser pautada na responsabilidade para com seus proprietários, os governos e os demais interessados, e a governança
corporativa deve ser um instrumento para a consecução de tal objetivo. No trabalho,
entendeu-se que as políticas sociais das estatais, quando bem administradas, podem
fazer parte de uma estratégia eficiente de geração de valor, no âmbito das teorias de
stakeholders. Portanto, objetivou-se investigar como a realização de boas práticas de
governança corporativa nas empresas estatais pode contribuir para que o braço social
da corporação melhore o desempenho financeiro em vez de se restringir a ações de
interesses partidários. Concluiu-se que tais empresas devem considerar as estratégias
associadas à ideia de responsabilidade social corporativa sob algumas restrições.
Citação ABNT:
MIRANDA, R. A.; AMARAL, H. F. Governança corporativa e gestão socialmente responsável em empresas estatais. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1069-1094, 2011.
Citação APA:
Miranda, R. A., & Amaral, H. F. (2011). Governança corporativa e gestão socialmente responsável em empresas estatais. Revista de Administração Pública, 45(4), 1069-1094.
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/2434/governanca-corporativa-e-gestao-socialmente-responsavel-em-empresas-estatais/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
AHARONI, Yair. Performance evaluation of State-owned enterprises: a process perspective. Management Science, v. 27, n. 11, p. 1340-1347, Nov. 1981.

AHARONI, Yair. The State-owned enterprise as a competitor in international markets. Columbia Journal of World Business, v. 15, n. 1, p. 14-22, Spring 1980.

BAUMOL, William J. Business behavior, value and growth. New York: Macmillan, 1959.

BERLE, Adolph A.; MEANS, Gardiner C. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan, 1932.

BLOOM, Paul N.; GUNDLACH, Gregory T. Handbook of marketing and society. California: Sage Publications, 2001.

BOWEN, Howard R. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row, 1953.

BRANCO, Manuel C.; RODRIGUES, Lúcia L. Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organiation Studies, v. 12, n. 1, p. 5-15, 2007.

BRIGHAM, Eugene F.; EHRHARDT, Michael C. Administração financeira: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Thomson Pioneira, 2005.

CARR, Albert Z. Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review, v. 46, n. 1, p. 143-146, 148-149, 152-153, Jan./Feb. 1968.

CARROLL, Archie B. A tree-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, v. 4, n. 4, p. 39-48, 1979.

CARROLL, Archie B. Corporate social responsibility: evolutional of definitional construct. Business & Society, v. 38, n. 3, p. 268-295, Sep. 1999.

CARROLL, Archie B. Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 10, n. 1, p. 33-42, 2000b.

CARROLL, Archie B. The four faces of corporate citizenship. In: RICHARDSON, John E. Business ethics 00/01. Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2000a. p. 187-191.

CARROLL, Archie B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward of moral management of organizational stakeholder. Business Horizons, v. 34, n. 4, p. 39-48, 1991.

CHEWNING, Richard C.; EBY, John W.; ROELS, Shirley J. Business through the eyes of faith. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1990.

CLARKE, Julia. Corporate social reporting: an ethical practice. In: BLAKE, John; GOWTHORPE, Catherine. Ethical issues in accounting. London & New York: Routledge, 1998. p. 184-199.

CSR EUROPE; DELOITTE; EURONEXT. Investing in responsible business: the 2003 survey of European fund managers, financial analysts and investor relations officers. CSR Europe, 2003. Disponível em: .

DEST. Perfil das empresas estatais: exercício 2005. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, 2005. Disponível em: .

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility — green paper. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, 2001.

FREEMAN, R. Edward. Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In: PINCUS, L.B. Perspectives in business ethics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1998. p. 171-181.

FREEMAN, R. Edward; WICKS, Andrew C.; PARMAR, Bidhan. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, v. 15, n. 3, p. 364-369, 2004.

FRIEDMAN, Milton. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, Sept. 13, 1970. Disponível em: .

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE. Clear advantage: building shareholder value. Gemi, Feb. 2004. Disponível em: .

GOODPASTER, Kenneth. E. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 1, n. 1, p. 53-73, 1991.

GRAVES, Samuel P.; WADDOCK, Sandra; KELLY, Marjorie. How do you measure corporate citizenship? Business Ethics, v. 15, n. 2, p. 17, Mar./Apr. 2001.

HAFSI, T.; KOENIG, C. The State-SOE relationship: some patterns. Journal of Management Studies, v. 25, n. 3, p. 235-249, May 1998.

JAWAHAR, I.M.; MCLAUGHLIN, Gary. L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 3, p. 397-414, June 2001.

JENSEN, Michael; MECKLING, W. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360, 1976.

JENSEN, Michael. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, v. 14, n. 3, p. 8-21, 2001.

LANTOS, Geoffrey P. The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 18, n. 7, p. 595-630, 2001.

LA PORTA, Rafael; LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, Florencio; SHLEIFER, Andrei. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, v. 54, n. 2, p. 717-738, 1998.

LEVITT, Theodore. The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, v. 36, n. 5, p. 41-50, 1958.

LIOUKAS, S.; BOURANTAS, D.; PAPADAKIS, V. Managerial autonomy of Stateowned enterprises: determining factors. Organization Science, v. 4, n. 4, p. 645-666, Nov. 1993.

MCWILLIAMS, Abagail; SIEGEL, Donald. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 1, p. 117-127, 2001.

MCWILLIAMS, Abagail; SIEGEL, Donald; WRIGHT, Patrick M. Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2006.

MONSEN, R. Joseph; WALTERS, Kenneth D. The nationalized firm: the politicians free lunch? Columbia Journal of World Business, v. 12, n. 1, p. 90-102, Spring 1977.

NIELSEN, Richard P. Government-owned businesses: market presence, competitive advantages and rationales for their support by the State. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v. 41, n. 1, p. 17-27, Jan. 1982.

OCDE. OCDE guidelines on corporate governance of State-owned enterprises. Paris: OCDE Publishing, 2005.

PORTER, Michael. A vantagem competitiva das nações. São Paulo: Campus, 1989.

PORTER, Michael E.; KRAMER, Mark R. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, v. 80, n. 12, p. 56-68, 2002.

SCHWARTZ, Mark S.; CARROLL, Archie B. Corporate social responsibility: a threedomain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 13, n. 4, p. 503-530, 2003.

SIMON, Herbert A. Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, v. 69, n. 4, p. 495-513, Sept. 1979.

SIMON, Herbert A. Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, v. 49, n. 3, p. 253-288, June 1959.

STERNBERG, Elaine. The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance, v. 5, n. 1, p. 3-10, Jan. 1997.

STRANDBERG, Coro. The convergence of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: thought-leaders study. Burnaby, 2005. Disponível em: .

UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL COMPACT. Who cares wins: connecting financial markets to a changing world. United Nations, 2004. Disponível em: .

VALOR, Carmen. Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review, v. 110, n. 2, p. 191-212, 2005.

VERNON, Raymond. Linking managers with ministers: dilemmas of the Stateowned enterprises. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, v. 4, n. 1, p. 39-55, Autumn 1984.

WILLIAMSON, Oliver E. The economics of discretionary behavior: management objectives in a theory of a firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1964.

WINDSOR, Duane. Corporate social responsibility: three keys approaches. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 93-114, 2006.

ZIF, Jehiel. Explanatory concepts of managerial strategic behavior in State-owned enterprises: a multinational study. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 14, n. 1, p. 35-46, Spring/Summer 1983.

ZIF, Jehiel. Managerial strategic behavior in State-owned enterprises – business and political orientations. Management Science, v. 27, n. 11, p. 1326-1339, 1981.