Redes de Cooperação Tecnológica em Bio-Manguinhos: o Papel das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação

ID:
35097
Resumo:
Este artigo tem como objetivo identificar e discutir a contribuição das Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação (TICs) para os projetos de cooperação tecnológica de BioManguinhos, laboratório farmacêutico pertencente à Fundação Osvaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) e responsável pela produção de vacinas, de reativos e de biofármacos voltados para atender, prioritariamente, às demandas da saúde pública brasileira. Trata-se de um estudo de caso com abordagem qualitativa e observação participante, com finalidades descritiva e explicativa. Os dados foram coletados em 14 entrevistas realizadas com gestores de projetos de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (P&D) de alta relevância para a organização. Os resultados permitem concluir que as TICs envolvendo, necessariamente, maior interdependência entre os parceiros com fluxos bidirecionais de conhecimento ainda não eram utilizadas. Também ficou evidente a importância de uma maior aproximação entre a área de Tecnologia da Informação (TI) e a área de P&D. Conclui-se que um futuro posicionamento de Bio-Manguinhos como um centro tecnológico voltado para a descoberta e comercialização de novos princípios ativos pode favorecer o uso de ferramentas que contribuam para um nível maior de integração entre os parceiros das redes de colaboração tecnológica.
Citação ABNT:
OLIVEIRA, L. P.; PITASSI, C.; GONÇALVES, A. A. Redes de Cooperação Tecnológica em Bio-Manguinhos: o Papel das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação . Brazilian Business Review, v. 12, n. 3, p. 45-69, 2015.
Citação APA:
Oliveira, L. P., Pitassi, C., & Gonçalves, A. A. (2015). Redes de Cooperação Tecnológica em Bio-Manguinhos: o Papel das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação . Brazilian Business Review, 12(3), 45-69.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2015.12.3.3
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/35097/redes-de-cooperacao-tecnologica-em-bio-manguinhos--o-papel-das-tecnologias-de-informacao-e-comunicacao-/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
ATTWOOD, T. K. et al. Concepts, historical milestones and the central place of bioinformatics in modern biology: an European perspective. In: MAHDAVI, M. A. (Ed.). Bioinformatics-trends and methodologies. Rijeka: Intech. Online Publishers; 2011.

BALDI, P. ; BRUNAK, S. Bioinformatics: the machine learning approach. Boston: MIT Press, 2001.

BARBOSA, J. G. P. et al. A proposed architecture for implementing a knowledge management system in the Brazilian National Cancer Institute. Brazilian Administration Review - BAR, v. 6, n. 3, p. 246-262, 2009.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1979.

BARE, J. C. et al. Integration and visualization of systems biology data in context of the genome. BMC Bioinformatics, v. 11, p. 382-90, 2010.

BASTOS, V. D. Inovação farmacêutica: padrão setorial e perspectivas para o caso brasileiro. BNDES Setorial, n. 22, p. 271-296, 2005.

BIO-MANGUINHOS. Bio-Manguinhos: relatório de atividades 2010. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2010.

BLEICHER, K. H. et al. Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening. Nature Review Drug Discovery, v. 2, p. 369-378, 2003.

BOSE, R. Knowledge management-enabled health care management systems: capabilities, infrastructure, and decision-support. E. Systems with Applications, v. 24, n. 1, p. 59-71, 2003.

BROWN, C. The changing face of scientific discourse: analysis of Genomic and Proteomic database usage and acceptance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, v. 54, n. 10, p. 926-938, 2003.

BROWN, T. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, Jun. 2008.

CATANHO, M.; DE MIRANDA, A. B.; DEGRAVE, W. Comparando genomas: bancos de dados e ferramentas computacionais para a análise comparativa de genomas procarióticos. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde, v. 1, n. 2, p. 335-358, 2007.

CHECKLAND, P. B. From framework through experience to learning: the essential nature of action research. In: NISSEN, H.; KLEIN, H. K; HIRSCHHEIM, R. A. (Eds.). Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions. Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1991.

CHEN, L. S. Triagem de alto desempenho na detecção de atividade de epóxidohidrolases e monooxigenases utilizando células íntegras. 2006. Tese (Doutorado) -Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), 2006.

CHESBROUGH, H. W. Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long range planning, v. 43, p. 354-363, 2010.

CHESBROUGH, H. W. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: CHESBROUGH, H.W.; VANHAVERBEKE, W. J. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

CHESBROUGH, H. W. Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press, 2003.

CHESBROUGH, H. W.; APPLEYARD, M. M. Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, v. 50, n. 1, p. 57-76, 2007.

CHIARONI, D.; CHIESA, V. ; FRATTINI, F. Patterns of collaboration along the BioPharmaceutical innovation process. Journal of Business Chemistry, v. 5, n. 1, p. 7-22, 2008.

CHRISTENSEN, J. F. Whiter core competency for the large corporation in an open innovation world? In: CHESBROUGH, H; VANHAVERBEKE, W.; WEST, J. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. London: Oxford University Press, 2006.

COOMBS, R.; METCALFE, J.S. Organizing for innovation: co-ordinating distributed capabilities. In: FOSS; N.; MAHNKE, V. Competence, governance and entrepreneurship. London: Oxford University Press, 2000.

CURCIN, V. ; GHANEM, M. Scientific workflow systems: can one size fit all? In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE CAIRO BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2008, Cairo (EGY). Anais… Cairo, 2008, p. 1-9.

DANTAS, E.; BELL, M. Latecomer firm and the emergence and development of knowledge networks: the case of Petrobras in Brazil. Research Policy, v. 38, p. 829-844, 2009

DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN Y. S. Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications; 2000.

DIGIAMPIETRI, L. A. Gerenciamento de workflows científicos em Bioinformática. Tese (Doutorado) Instituto de Computação da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), 2007.

DOGSON, M.; GANN, D.; SALTER, A. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. Research & Development Management, v. 36, n. 3, p. 333-346, 2006.

DYER, J. H.; SINGH, H. The relational view: cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 660-679, 1998.

FEBLES RODRIGUEZ, J. P. ; GONZALEZ PEREZ, A. Aplicación de la minería de datos en la Bioinformática. ACIMED [online], v. 10, n. 2, p. 69-76, 2002

GASSMANN, O.; VON ZEDTWITZ, M. Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D Teams. Research & Development Management, v. 33, p. 243-262, 2003.

GOMES-CASSERES, B. The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press, 1996.

GULATI, R. Alliances and networks. Strategic management journal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 293-319, 1998.

HACIEVLIYAGIL, N. K. The impact of open innovation on technology transfers at Philips and DSM. 2007. (Tese) Delft University of Technology, 2007.

HANNAN, M.; FREEMAN, J. The population ecology of organizations. Americam Journal of Sociology, v. 82, p. 929-964, 1977.

HEBERT, M. A.; KORABEK, B.; SCOTT, R. E. Moving research into practice: a decision framework for integrating home telehealth into chronic illness care. International Journal of Medical Information, v. 75, p. 786-794, 2006.

HUGHES, B.; WAREHAM, J. Knowledge arbitrage in global pharma: a synthetic view of absorptive capacity and open innovation. Research & Development Management, v. 40, n. 3, p. 324-343, 2010.

HUSTON, L.; SAKKAB, N. Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 85, p. 58-66, 2006.

JARRILLO, J. C. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, v. 9, p. 31-41, 1998.

KOHLBACHER, O. et al. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1055-1080, 1996.

LAURSEN, K.; SALTER, A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, v. 27, p. 131-150, 2006.

LENOIR, T. Shaping biomedicine as an information science. In: BOWDEN, M.E.; HAHN, T.B.; WILLIANS, R.V. (Eds). In: CONFERENCE ON THE HISTORY AND HERITAGE OF SCIENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1998, Medford (NJ). Anais… Medford, 1998. p. 27-45.

LESK, A. M. Introdução à bioinformática. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008.

LICHTENTHALER, U.; LICHTENTHALER, L. A capacity-based framework for Open Innovation: complementing Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management Studies, v. 46, n. 8, p. 1315-1338, 2009.

MALERBA, F; ORSENIGO, L. Innovation and market structure in dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and Biotechnology: towards a history friendly model. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 11, n. 4, p. 667-703, 2001.

MAQUEIRA, J. M.; BRUQUE, S. Grid information technology as a new technological tool for e science, healthcare and life science. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 2, n. 2, p. 95-113, 2007.

MCGUFFEE, S. R.; ELCOCK, A. H. Diffusion, crowding & protein stability in a dynamic molecular model of the bacterial cytoplasm. PLoS Computational Biology, v. 6, n. 3, 2010.

NAKAGAWA. A.S. LIMS: implementation and management. Cambridge: the Royal Society of Chemistry, 1994.

NAMBISAN, S. Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: toward a theory. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 3, p. 392-413, 2002.

NAZNIN, F.; SARKER, R.; ESSAM, D. Vertical decomposition with genetic algorithm for multiple sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics, v. 12, p. 353-79, 2011.

NEUBAUER, F.; HOHEISEL, A.; GEILER, J. Workflow-based grid applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, v. 22, n. 1/2, p. 6-15, 2006.

NOOTEBOON, B. Inter-firm alliances: analysis and design. London: Routledge, 1999.

OLIVEIRA, L.P. O uso das TIC nas estratégias de P&D em colaboração com parceiros externos: caso de Bio-Manguinos. 1998. Dissertação (Mestrado) Estácio de Sá, 2011.

OSTROWSKI, J.; WYRWICZ, L.S. integrating genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics in translational studies of molecular medicine. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, v. 9, n. 6, p. 623-630, 2009.

PERSIDIS, A. High-throughput screening. Nature Biotechnology, v. 16, p. 488-489, 1998.

PISANO, G. P. ; VERGANTI, R. Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Strategic Management Journal, dec. 2008.

PITASSI, C. A Virtualidade nas estratégias de inovação aberta: proposta de articulação conceitual. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 46, p. 619-641, 2012.

POWELL, W. et al. Dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, v. 110, p. 1132-1205, 2005.

ROTHWELL, R. Industrial innovation: success, strategy, trends. In: DODGSON, M.; ROTHWELL, R . (Eds.). The handbook of industrial innovation. Hants: Edward Elgar, 1994.

SAKKAB, N. Y. Connect and develop complements research and develop at P&G. Research-Technology Management, v. 45, n. 2, p. 38-45, 2002.

SETÚBAL, J. C.; MEIDANIS, J. Introduction to computational Molecular Biology. Boston: PWS Publishing Company, 1997.

SIVADAS, E.; DWYER, R. F. An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, v. 64, p. 31-49, 2000.

STAJICH, J. E.; LAPP, H. Open source tools and toolkits for Bioinformatics: significance, and where are we? Briefings in Bioinformatics, v. 7, n. 3, p. 287-296, 2006.

STAKE, R. E. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks-USA: Sage, 1995.

TEECE, D; PISANO, G; SHUEN. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal v. 18, n. 7, p. 509-533, 1997.

THOMKE, S. H. Experimentation matters: unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Harvard Business School Press, 2003.

THUROW, K. et al. Laboratory information management systems for life science applications. Organic Process Research & Development, v. 8, n. 6, p. 970-982, 2004.

TRIEGLAFF, O.; STURM, M. TOPP: the open MS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics, v. 23, n. 2, p. 191-97, 2007.

TROTT, P. ; HARTMANN, D. Why “Open Innovation” is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 13, n. 4, p. 715-736, 2009.

UZZI, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embededdness. Administrative Science Quartely, v. 42, p. 36-67, 1997.

VERGARA, S. C. Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. 9. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.

VERONA G.; PRANDELLI E.; SAWHNEY, M. Innovation and virtual environments: towards virtual knowledge brokers. Organizational Studies, v. 27, n. 6, p. 765-788, 2006.

VON HIPPEL, E.; KATZ, R. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, v. 48, n. 7, p. 821-833, 2002.

WAGNER, G. Geração e análise comparativa de sequências genômicas de Trypanossoma rangeli. 2006. Dissertação - (Mestrado) - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Biologia Celular e Molecular, 2006.

YIN, R. K. Case study research: design and methods. London: SAGE Publications, 1994.