Editorial 2016 v. 20 n. 1 Outros Idiomas

ID:
38897
Autores:
Citação ABNT:
KIMURA, H.Editorial 2016 v. 20 n. 1. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1-4, 2016.
Citação APA:
Kimura, H.(2016). Editorial 2016 v. 20 n. 1. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 20(1), 1-4.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2016150328
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/38897/editorial-2016-v--20-n--1/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Editorial
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
Haug, C. J. (2015). Peer-review fraud - hacking the scientific publication process. The New England Journal of Medicine, October, pp. 1-3. 21Recuperado de http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1512330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512330

Jennings, C. (2006). The true purpose of peer review. What you can't measure, you can't manage: the need for quantitative indicators in peer review. Nature. Recuperado de http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05032.html. doi: 10.1038/nature05032

Lachmann, P. (2002). The research integrity initiative: progress report. In: C. White (Ed.), The COPE report 2002: annual report of the committee on publication ethics. pp. 8-12. London: BMJ Books.

Lee, K.; Bero, L. (2006). Increasing accountability. What authors, editors and reviewers should do to improve peer review. Nature. Recuperado de http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05007.html. doi: 10.1038/nature05007

Mulligan, A. (2004). Is peer review in crisis? Perspectives in Publishing, (2), 1-6. Recuperado de https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/93675/PerspPubl2.pdf

Mulligan, A.; Hall, L.; Raphael, E. (2013). Peer review in a changing world: an international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 132-161. doi: 10.1002/asi.22798

Relman, A. S. (1990). Peer review in scientific journals - what good is it? Western Journal of Medicine, 153(5), 520-522.

Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178-182. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178

Voice of Young Science. (2012). Peer review: the nuts and bolts: a guide for early career researchers. Recuperado de http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/resources/99/Peer-review_The-nutsand-bolts.pdf

Walker, R.; Silva, P. R. da. (2015). Emerging trends in peer review – a survey. Frontiers in Neuroscience, v. 9, p. 1-18. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00169