The parent-subsidiary relationship. International technology cooperation: the Fiat Auto case Outros Idiomas

ID:
4018
Resumo:
The role of the subsidiaries, in the decision making process of international technology alliance operation and its execution, has increasingly become a critical factor for the success of the operation itself. The objective of this paper is to explore the factors that can influence the role of the subsidiary on the effectiveness of international technology cooperation. The work focused on three different international technology alliances in the Fiat Group Automobiles, representing different directions in the process and information flows within the parent-subsidiary relationship. The case study method was applied to investigate these three selected alliances. Interviews were conducted with top management of FIAT in Brazil and in Italy. The findings have been summarized into four main lessons and they are discussed vis-à-vis the extant literature. From the theoretical viewpoint, these factors highlight further potential contributions to the current streams of research on MNCs and their process of technological innovation.
Citação ABNT:
BAGLIERI, E.; BRUNO, M.; VASCONCELLOS, E.; GRANDO, A. The parent-subsidiary relationship. International technology cooperation: the Fiat Auto case. Innovation and Management Review, v. 7, n. 3, art. 138, p. 198-218, 2010.
Citação APA:
Baglieri, E., Bruno, M., Vasconcellos, E., & Grando, A. (2010). The parent-subsidiary relationship. International technology cooperation: the Fiat Auto case. Innovation and Management Review, 7(3), 198-218.
DOI:
10.5773/rai.v7i3.394
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/4018/the-parent-subsidiary-relationship--international-technology-cooperation--the-fiat-auto-case/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
Andersson, U.; Forsgren, M. (1996). Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5), 487-508.

Andersson, U.; Forsgren, M.; Holm, U. (2001). Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs — multi-level analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6), 1013-1034.

Andersson, U.; Forsgren, M.; Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979-996.

Astley, W. G.; Zajac, E. J. (1990). Beyond dyadic exchange: functional interdependence and subunit power. Organization Studies, 11(4), 481-501.

Astley, W. G.; Zajac, E. J. (1991). Intraorganizational power and organizational design: reconcilling rational and coalitional models of organization. Organization Science 2(4), 104-113.

Bartlett, C. A.; Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: the transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Birkinshaw, J. (2002). Managing internal R&D networks in global firms: what sort of knowledge is involved?. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 245-267.

Birkinshaw, J.; Fey, C. (2000). Building an internal market system: insights from five R&D organizations. In J. Birkinshaw & P. Hagstrom (Eds.), The flexible firm: capability management in network organizations. p. 149-175. Oxfrod: Oxford University Press.

Birkinshaw, J.; Morrison, A. J. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 729-754.

Bruno, M. A. C.; Vasconcellos, E. (2003) Applying a management framework to three high-sharing technological alliances. Rivista Finanza Marketing e Produzione, 2(21), 107-126.

Cantwell, J. (2001). Innovation and information technology in MNE. In A. M. Rugman, & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business. p. 431-456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Casson, M. (1991). Global research strategy and international competitiveness. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chiesa, V.; Manzini, R. (1998). Organizing for technological collaborations: a managerial perspective. R&D Management, 28(3), 199-212.

Crookel, H.; Morrison, A. (1990). Subsidiary strategy in a free trade environment. Business Quarterly, 55(2), 33-39.

De Meyer, A. (1993). Management of an international network of industrial R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 23(2), 109-120.

Dobler, D. W.; Burt, D. N. (1996). Purchasing and supply management: text and cases. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dowlatshahi, S. (1992). Purchasing‘ s role in a concurrent engineering environment. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(1), 21-25.

Dowlatshahi, S. (1993). A novel approach to product design and development in a concurrent engineering environment. Technovation, 13(3), 161-176.

Dowlatshahi, S. (1997). The role of product design in designer buyer-supplier interface. Production and Planning Control, 8(6), 522-532.

Dowst, S. (1984). Better-forged links bring in better designs. Purchasing, pp. 67-75. sept. 6.

Dubois, A.; Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business research, 55(7), 553-560.

Dunning, J. H. (1996). The geographical sources of competitiveness of firms: some results of a new survey. Transnational Corporations, 5(3), 1-30.

Dyer, D.; Dalzell, F.; Olegario, R. (2004). Rising tide: lessons from 16 years of brand building at Procter & Gamble. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Easton, G. (2000) Case research as a methodology for industrial networks: a realist apologia. In S. Fleetwood & S. Ackroyd (Eds.), Realist perspectives on management and organizations. p. 205-219. London: Routledge.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Florida, R. (1997). The globalization of R&D: results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in USA. Research Policy, 26(1), 85-103.

Foss, N.; Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49-67.

Foss, N.; Pedersen, T. (2004). Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: an introduction. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 340-349.

Galbraith, J. R. (2000). Designing the global corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gassmann, O.; Zedtwitz, M. (1999). New concepts and trends in international R&D organization. Research Policy, 28(2/3), 231-250.

Gassmann, O.; Zedtwitz, M. (2003). Trends and determinants of virtual R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 243-263.

Gerstner, Jr, L. V. (2002). Who says elephants can’t dance? New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Ghoshal, S.; Westney, E. D. (1993). Introduction and overview. In S.Ghoshal & E. D. Westney (Eds.), Organization theory and the multinational corporation. p. 1-23. New York: St. Martin‘s Press.

Greybadze, A.; Reger, G. (1999). Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28(2/3), 251-274.

Guedes, L.; Vasconcellos, E.; Vasconcellos, L. (2010), Global R&D coordination assessment: 3M case. [CD-ROM]. Proceedings of the International Association for the Management of Technology Conference, 19. Vancouver: IAMOT.

Gupta, A. K.; Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. The Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 768-792.

Gupta, A. K.; Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.

Hagedoorn, J. (1996). Trends and patterns in strategic technology partnering since the early seventies. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(5), 601-616.

Hagedoorn J.; Schakenraad J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 291-309.

Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business. p. 205-226. Kidlington: Elsevier Science.

Harzing, A. W.; Noorderhaven N. (2006). Knowledge flows in MNCs: an empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan‘s typology of subsidiary roles. International Business Review, 15(3), 195-214.

Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9- 35.

Holm, U.; Sharma, D. (2006). Subsidiary marketing knowledge and strategic development of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Management, 12(1), 47-66.

Howells, J. (1990). The internationalisation of R&D and the development of global research networks. Regional Studies, 24(6), 495-512.

Ingham, M.; Mothe, C. (1998). How to learn in R&D partnerships? R&D Management, 28(4), 249-261.

Jarillo, J. C.; Martinez, J. I. (1991). Coordination demands of international strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 429-444.

Johnston, W. J.; Leach, M. P.; Liu, A. H. (1999). Theory testing using case studies in business-tobusiness research. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(3), 201-213.

Kuemmerle, W. (1999). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronic industries-results form a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28(2/3), 179- 193.

Lasserre, P. (2003). Global strategic management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

McCutcheon, D.; Meredith, J. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 239-256.

Miles, M. B.; Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

Minbaeva, D.; Pedersen, T.; Bjorkman, I.; Fey, C.; Park H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 34, p. 586-599.

Mytelka, L. (1991). Strategic partnerships: states, firms and international competition. London: Pinter.

Narula, R.; Zanfei, A. (2003). Globalization of innovation: the role of multinational enterprises. Working Paper, 03-15. Copenhagen: DRUID.

Nobel, R.; Birkinshaw, J. (1998). Innovation in multinational corporations: control and communication patterns in international R&D operations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 479-496.

O'Donnell, S. (2000). Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 525-548.

Perlmutter, H. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, v. 4, p. 9-18.

Rogers, E. M.; Carayannis, E. G.; Kurihara, K.; Allbritton, M. M. (1998). Cooperative research and development agreements (CRADAS) as technology transfer mechanisms. R&D Management, 28(2), 79-88.

Russo, R. S. M.; Cavalcante, M. B.; Vasconcellos, E.; Sbragia, R. (2008). R&D internationalization and the organization stucture: the case of Siemens - Brasil [CD-ROM]. Proceedings of International Association for the Management of Technology Conference, 17. Vancouver: IAMOT.

Schmid, S.; Schurig, A. (2003). The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary's business network. International Business Review, 12(6), 755-782.

Simons, R. (2005). Levers of organization design: how managers use accountability systems for greater performance and commitment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Sumelius, J.; Sarala, R. (2008). Knowledge development in mnc subsidiaries: the influence of mnc internal and external knowledge and control mechanisms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(4), 245-258.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Beverly Hills: Sage.