A Comprehensive Comparison of Educational Growth within Four Different Developing Countries between 1990 and 2012 Outros Idiomas

ID:
40734
Resumo:
Educational growth is a fundamental infrastructure factor required to achieve sustainable development. Therefore, evaluation and measurement of educational growth is essential for establishing a development road map. Because of this, there are many organizations and databases that work to capture academic trends and provide the general view of institute achievements. Web of Science and Scopus are the two most popular and scientific. In this paper, we define the important effective factors in educational growth and discuss them; we then compare these defined factors across four different developing countries: Brazil, Iran, Malaysia, and Turkey. As well as the comparisons, this paper uses the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient method to analyze the factors and the strong or weak relationship between the factors is discussed. Through this research, the reader, especially the decision maker will find the effect of the institute and research income to publication as well as other educational growth.
Citação ABNT:
SHAKIBA, M.; EBRAHIM, N. A.; DANAEE, M.; BAKHTIYARI, K.; SUNDARARAJAN, E. A Comprehensive Comparison of Educational Growth within Four Different Developing Countries between 1990 and 2012. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, v. 6, n. 3, p. 152-174, 2015.
Citação APA:
Shakiba, M., Ebrahim, N. A., Danaee, M., Bakhtiyari, K., & Sundararajan, E. (2015). A Comprehensive Comparison of Educational Growth within Four Different Developing Countries between 1990 and 2012. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 6(3), 152-174.
DOI:
10.7769/gesec.v6i3.486
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/40734/a-comprehensive-comparison-of-educational-growth-within-four-different-developing-countries-between-1990-and-2012/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
Aghaei Chadegani, A.; Salehi, H.; Yunus, M. M.; Farhadi, H.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, M.; et al. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26.

Ale Ebrahim, N.; Salehi, H.; Embi, M. A.; Habibi Tanha, F.; Gholizadeh, H.; Motahar, S. M.; et al. (2013). Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-99.

Bas, K.; Dayangac, M.; Yaprak, O.; Yuzer, Y.; Tokat, Y. (2011). International Collaboration of Turkey in Liver Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. [Article]. Transplantation Proceedings, 43(10), 3796-3801.

Basu, A. (2010). Does a country's scientific 'productivity' depend critically on the number of country journals indexed? [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Scientometrics, 82(3), 507-516.

Chirici, G. (2012). Assessing the scientific productivity of Italian forest researchers using the Web of Science, SCOPUS and SCIMAGO databases. [Article]. Iforest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, v. 5, p. 101-107.

De Filippo, D.; Casani, F.; Garcia-Zorita, C.; Efrain-Garcia, P.; Sanz-Casado, E. (2012). Visibility in international rankings. Strategies for enhancing the competitiveness of Spanish universities. [Article]. Scientometrics, 93(3), 949-966.

Eshraghi, A.; Abu Osman, N. A.; Karimi, M. T.; Gholizadeh, H.; Ali, S.; Wan Abas, W. A. B. (2012). Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of a New Prosthetic Suspension System with Two Existing Suspension Systems for Lower Limb Amputees. American Journal Of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Publish Ahead of Print. 10.1097/PHM.1090b1013e318269d318282a.

Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science - new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, v. 122, p. 108-111.

Garfield, E.; Welljamsdorof, A. (1992). Citation Data - Their Use As Quantitative Indicators For Science And Technology Evaluation And Policy-Making. (Reprinted From Science And PublicPolicy, Vol 19, PG 321-327, 1992). [Reprint]. Current Contents, v. 49, p. 5-13.

Gholizadeh, H.; Salehi, H.; Embi, M. A.; Danaee, M.; Ordi, A.; HabibiTanha, F.; et al. (2014). Economic Growth and Internet Usage Impact on Publication Productivity among ASEAN’s and World’s Best Universities. Modern Applied Science, 8(5), 169-178.

Ibanez, A.; Larranaga, P.; Bielza, C. (2013). Cluster methods for assessing research performance: exploring Spanish computer science. [Article]. Scientometrics, 97(3), 571-600.

Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Pouris, A. (2013). The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application. [Article]. Scientometrics, 95(1), 129-139.

Moed, H. F.; Glänzel, W. (2004). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Mohammadhassanzadeh, H.; Samadikuchaksaraei, A.; Shokraneh, F.; Valinejad, A.; Abolghasem-Gorji, H.; Yue, C. (2010). A Bibliometric Overview of 30 Years of Medical Sciences Productivity in Iran. [Article]. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 13(4), 313-317.

Oldford, R. W. (2003). Editorial: Statistics and computing: Having an impact. Statistics and Computing, 13(2), 87-89.

Rakhshandehroo, M.; Yusof, M. J. M.; Ale Ebrahim, N.; Sharghi, A.; Arabi, R. (2015). 100 Most Cited Articles in Urban Green and Open Spaces: A Bibliometric Analysis. Current World Environment, 10(2), 445-455.

Sweileh, W.; Zyoud, S. E.; Al-Jabi, S.; Sawalha, A. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of diabetes mellitus research output from Middle Eastern Arab countries during the period (1996-2012). Scientometrics, 101(1), 819-832.

The SCImago Journal & Country Rank. (2014). Retrieved 14 November, 2014, from http://www.scimagojr.com/help.php

Zhai, L.; Yan, X.; Shibchurn, J.; Song, X. (2014). Evolutionary analysis of international collaboration network of Chinese scholars in management research. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1435-1454.

Zhao, D. (2005). Challenges of scholarly publications on the web to the evaluation of science - A comparison of author visibility on the web and in print journals. Inf Process Manage, v. 41, p. 1403-1418.