Domain-Specific Innovativeness: A Meta-Analysis in Business and Consumer Outros Idiomas

ID:
41596
Resumo:
The specific domain of a product and the perception of innovation are topics that aroused interest in research in the last twenty years, especially after the development of the domain-specific innovativeness (DSI) construct. This paper conducted a meta-analysis to assess the consequents of the DSI. To this end, a total of 276 works were identified in nine databases, of which 78 were included in the study work, generating 98 observations for a sample set of 40,641. The results showed significant relationships between the consequents: adoption of innovation, attitude, behavioral intention, product usage, opinion leader and risk perception. Furthermore, it was noted that the research method (survey vs. experimental) and the country of application (Western vs. Eastern) were moderating factors of the relationships between DSI, opinion leader and behavioral intention.
Citação ABNT:
ARAÚJO, C. F.; LADEIRA, W. J.; SANTINI, F. O.; SAMPAIO, C. H. Domain-Specific Innovativeness: A Meta-Analysis in Business and Consumer. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 13, n. 2, p. 48-67, 2016.
Citação APA:
Araújo, C. F., Ladeira, W. J., Santini, F. O., & Sampaio, C. H. (2016). Domain-Specific Innovativeness: A Meta-Analysis in Business and Consumer. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(2), 48-67.
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/41596/domain-specific-innovativeness--a-meta-analysis-in-business-and-consumer/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
Agarwal, R.; Karahanna E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quartely, 24(4), 665-94.

Agarwal, R.; Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information System Research, 9(2), 204-15.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Aldás-Manzano, J.; Lassala-Navarré, K.; Ruiz-Mafé, C.; Sanz-Blas, S. (2009). The Role of Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk in Online Banking Usage. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 53-75.

Bartels, J.; Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601-609.

Black, J. S. (1982). Opinion leaders: Is anyone following? Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(2), 169-176.

Caro, A.; Mazzon, J.; Caemmerer B.; Wessling, M. (2011). Inovatividade, envolvimento, atitude e experiência na adoção de compra on-line. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo 52(6).

Citrin, A. V.; Sprott, D. E.; Silverman, S. N.; Stem Jr, D. E. (2000). Adoption of internet shopping: the role of consumer innovativeness. Industry Management Data System, 100(7), 294-300.

Conchar, M. P.; Zinkhan, G. M.; Peters, C.; Olavarrieta, S. (2004). An integrated framework for the conceptualization of consumers’ perceived-risk processing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(4), 418-436.

Crespo, H. A.; Del Bosque, I. R. (2008). The effect of innovativeness on the adoption of B2C ecommerce: a model based on the theory of planned behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2830-2847.

DelVecchio, D.; Smith, D. C. (2005). Brand-extension price premiums: the effects of perceived fit and extension product category risk, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 184-96.

Eastlick, M. A.; Lotz, S. (1999). Profiling potential adopters and non-adopters of an interactive electronic shopping medium. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(6), 209-223.

Farley, J. U.; Lehmann, D. R.; Sawyer, A. (1995). Empirical marketing generalization using metaanalysis. Marketing Science, 14(3_supplement), G36-G46.

Feick, L. F.; Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83-97.

Fern, E. F.; Monroe, K. B. (1996). Effect-size estimates: Issues and problems in interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, p. 89-105.

Flynn, L. R.; Goldsmith, R. E. (1993). A validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker innovativeness scale. Education Psychology Measuring v. 53, p. 1105-16.

Flynn, L. R.; Goldsmith, R. E.; Eastman, J. K. (1996). Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(2), 137-147.

Gao, T.; Rohm, A. J.; Sultan, F.; Huang, S. (2012). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward mobile marketing: a comparative study of youth markets in the United States and China. Thunderbird International Business Review, 54(2), 211-224.

Gao, T. T.; Rohm, A. J.; Sultan, F.; Pagani, M. (2013). Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2536-2544.

Gatignon, H.; Robertson, T. S. (1991), Innovative decision processes. In: Robertson, T. S.; Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds), Handbook of Consumer Behavior. pp. 316-4. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ,

Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.

Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). Using the domain specific innovativeness scale to identify innovative internet consumers. Internet Research, 11(2), 149-158.

Goldsmith, R. E.; d'Hauteville F. (1998). Heavy wine consumption: empirical and theoretical perspectives. Britsh Food Journal, 100(4), 184-90.

Goldsmith, R. E.; d’Hauteville, R. E.; Flynn, L. R. (1998). Theory and measurement of consumer innovativeness: A transnational evaluation, European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 340-353.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Eastman, J.; Freiden, J. (1996). The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation, 15(10), 601-612.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Flynn, L. R. (1992). Identifying innovators in consumer product markets. Europe Journal Innovation Management 26(12), 42-55.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Flynn, L. R. (1995). The domain specific innovativeness scale: theoretical and practical dimensions. In Association for Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings. 4(1995), 177-182.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Goldsmith, E. B. (1996). An empirical study of overlap of innovativeness, Psychological Reports, v. 79, 1113-14.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal Academy Marketing Science, v. 19, 209-21.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Kim, D.; Flynn, L. R.; Kim W. M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. Journal Society Psychology 145(5), 501-8.

Goldsmith, R. E.; Newell, S. J. (1997). Innovativeness and price sensitivity: managerial, theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(3), 163-174.

Hedges, L. V.; Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 283-295.

Hirunyawipada, T.; Paswan, A. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198.

Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. (second edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Huotilainen A.; Pirttilä-Backman A. M.; Tuorila H. (2006). How innovativeness relates to social representation of new foods and to the willingness to try and use such foods. Food Quality Prefer, 17(5), 353-361.

Karahanna, E.; Straub, D. W.; Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, p. 183-213.

Kim, W.; Di Benedetto, C. A.; Lancioni, R. A. (2011). The effects of country and gender differences on consumer innovativeness and decision processes in a highly globalized high-tech product market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(5), 714-744.

Lazarsfeld, P. F.; Berelson, B.; Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.

Midgley, D. F.; Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 4(2), 229-42.

Midgley, D. F.; Dowling G. R. (1993). A longitudinal study of product form innovation: the interaction between pre-dipositions and social messages. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 19, 611-625.

Mitchell, V. W.; Harris, G. (2005). The importance of consumers’ perceived risk in retail strategy, European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8), 821-37.

Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.

Myers, J. H.; Robertson, T. S. (1972). Dimensions of opinion leadership. Journal of Marketing Research, p. 41-46.

Nakata, C.; Sivakumar, K. (1996). National culture and new product development: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing, 60(1), 61-72.

Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V. A.; Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, v. 49, 41-50.

Punj, G. N.; Staelin, R. (1983). A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 366-380.

Robertson, T. S. (1971), Innovative Behavior and Communication, Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, NY.

Roehrich G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness concepts and measurements. Journal Business Research, v. 57, 671-7.

Rogers, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations. 4 ed. The Free Press, New York, NY.

Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. (Rev. Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Rosenthal, R.; Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple general purpose display of magnitude and experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 74, 166-169.

Ruvio, A.; Shoham, A. (2007). Innovativeness, exploratory behavior, market mavenship, and opinion leadership: An empirical examination in the Asian context. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 703-722.

Santini, F. O.; Ladeira, W. J.; Araujo, C. F. (2014) Antecedentes e Consequentes da Influência Interpessoal: Uma Meta-Análise da Escala SUSCEP, in: VI Encontro de Marketing da ANPAD, Gramado-RS

Schweitzer, F.; Gassmann, O.; Rau, C. (2014). Lessons from Ideation: Where Does User Involvement Lead Us? Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 155-167.

Shoham, A.; Ruvio, A. (2008). Opinion leaders and followers: A replication and extension. Psychology & Marketing, 25(3), 280-297.

Steenkamp, J. B. E. M.; Hofstede, F.; Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, v. 63, p. 55

Sun, T.; Youn, S.; Wu, G.; Kuntaraporn, M. (2006). Online Word‐of‐Mouth (or Mouse): An Exploration of Its Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1104-1127.

Szymanski, D. M.; Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 16-35.

Truong, Y. (2013). A cross-country study of consumer innovativeness and technological service innovation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 130-137.

Vieira, V. A. (2010). Antecedents and Consequences of marketing orientation: a Brazilian metaanalysis and an international mega-analysis. BAR, Brazilian Administration Review, 7(1), 40-58.

Wong, C. B. (2012). Facebook Usage by Small and Medium-sized Enterprise: The Role of Domain Specific Innovativeness. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 12(4).

Zhang, B.; Kim, J. H. (2013). Luxury fashion consumption in China: Factors affecting attitude and purchase intent. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(1), 68-79.