Uma análise da relação entre laços imersos e inovação do fornecedor no setor de cooperativismo Outros Idiomas

ID:
42821
Resumo:
Quais são os principais preditores do desenvolvimento dos laços imersos? Qual é o impacto das variáveis conhecimento do fornecedor, conhecimento do cliente e laços imersos no desenvolvimento de inovações no fornecedor no segmento de cooperativismo? Qual é o papel moderador dos laços imersos no desenvolvimento de inovações no fornecedor? Este estudo reúne 126 respostas dos fornecedores de uma grande cooperativa agrícola. Os resultados evidenciaram que há impacto positivo dos laços imersos no desenvolvimento da inovação e no conhecimento da inovação. Ademais, a pesquisa mostrou que há associação significativa entre o conhecimento dos fornecedores e a inovação, a qual é moderada pelo laço imerso. Isto evidencia que o laço imerso amplifica a capacidade de desenvolver inovação.
Citação ABNT:
VIEIRA, V. A.; SILVA, W. B. An analysis of the relationship between embedded ties and supplier innovation in the cooperative sector. RAUSP Management Journal, v. 51, n. 4, p. 386-396, 2016.
Citação APA:
Vieira, V. A., & Silva, W. B. (2016). An analysis of the relationship between embedded ties and supplier innovation in the cooperative sector. RAUSP Management Journal, 51(4), 386-396.
DOI:
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.003
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/42821/uma-analise-da-relacao-entre-lacos-imersos-e-inovacao-do-fornecedor-no-setor-de-cooperativismo/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
Ahearne, M.; Mathieu, J.; Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force?An empirical examination of the influence of leader behavior empowerment on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945

Ahearne, M.; Rapp, A.; Hughes, D. E.; Jindal, R. (2010). Managing sales force product perceptions and control systems in the success of new product introductions. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVII (August), 764-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.764

Anderson, E.; Jap, S. D. (2005). The dark side of close relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 75-82.

Anderson, E.; Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(3), 310-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.8.4.310

Antiqueira, J. R. M.; Saes, M. S. M.; Lazzarini, S. G. (2007). Comportamento oportunista em negociações envolvendo investimentos específicos: um estudo com metodologia experimental. Revista de Administração, 42(4), 393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-21072007000400001

Baldi, M.; Vieira, M. M. F. (2006). Calçado do Vale: imersão social e redes interorganizacionais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 46(3), 16-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902006000300003

Barden, J. Q.; Mitchell, W. (2007). Disentangling the influences of leaders’ relational embeddedness on interorganizational exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1440-1461. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.28225983

Baron, R. M.; Kenny, D. A. (1982). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Baron, R. M.; Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Bergkvist, L.; Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175

Borgatti, S. P.; Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4

Buchan, N.; Crosson, R. T. A.; Dawes, A. (2002). Swift neighbors and strangers persistent: The cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 168-206.

Castro, R. B.; Baldi, M. (2010). A inovação no Pólo Joalheiro de Belém: uma análise a partir do mecanismo de imersão estrutural. [Innovation in Pole Jeweler Bethlehem: An analysis from the structural immersionmechanism]. Cadernos Ebape, 8(3), 492-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512010000300008

Cavusgil, S. T.; Calantone, R. J.; Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6-21.

Chen, C. J.; Chang, L. S. (2004). Dynamics of business network embeddedness. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5(1/2), 237-241.

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(2), 64-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150876

Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 37-52.

Dhanaraj, C.; Lyles, M. A.; Steensma, H. K.; Tihanyi, L. (2004). Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: The role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 428-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400098

Dyer, H.; Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632

Dyer, J. H.; Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing the high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<34

Figueiredo, P. N.; de Andrade, R. F.; Brito, K. N. (2010). Aprendizagem tecnológica e acumulação de capacidades de inovação: evidências de contract manufacturers no Brasil. Revista de Administração, 45(2), 156-171.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2776392

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228311

Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33-50.

Gulati, A. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust?The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: The regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Henard, D. H.; Szymanski, M. D. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861

Holloway, S.; Parmigiani, A. (2014). Friends and profits do not mix: The performance implications of repeated partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 20(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0581

Jap, S. D. (1999). Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 461-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3152000

Johnson, J. L.; Sohi, R. S. (2001). The influence of firm predispositions on interfirm relationship formation in business markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(4), 299-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00042-8

Kaufmann, P. J.; Dant, R. P. (1992). The dimensions of commercial exchange. Marketing Letters, 3(2), 171-185.

Kyriakopoulos, K.; Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001

Moorman, C.; Zaltman, G.; Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172742

Moura, D. A.; Botter, R. C.; da Silva, A. F. (2010). Importância das dimensões custo, qualidade, flexibilidade, inovação, tempo e confiabilidade para a competitividade da atual indústria marítima brasileira. Revista de Administração, 45(1), 18-29.

Narayanan, S.; Narasimhan, R.; Schoenherr, T. (2015). Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34(1), 140-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.004

Noordhoff, C. S.; Kyriakopoulos, K.; Moorman, C.; Pauwels, P. (2011). The bright side and dark side of embedded ties in business-to-business innovation. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 34-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.5.34

Provan, K. G. (1993). Embeddedness, interdependence, and opportunism in organizational supplier-buyer networks. Journal of Management, 19(4), 841-856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(93)90030-Q

Reagans, R.; Mcevily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 130-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556658

Rindfleisch, A.; Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: The strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.1.18253

Ring, P. S.; Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental process of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118.

Rokkan, A. I.; Heide, J. B.; Wathne, K. H. (2003). Specific investments in marketing relationships: Expropriation and bonding effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 210-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.2.210.19223

Rowley, T.; Behrens, D.; Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)

Saxenian, A. L. (1996). Inside out: Regional networks and industrial adaptation in silicon valley and route 128. Cityscape: The Journal of Policy Development and Research, 2(2), 41-60.

Selnes, F.; Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting learning relationship. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 80-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.3.80.18656

Sivadas, E.; Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.1.31.17985

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology. p. 290-312. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.

Uzzi, B.; Lancaster, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49(4), 383-399.

Vieira, V. A.; Monteiro, P. R. R.; Veiga, R. T. (2011). Relationship marketing in supply chain: An empirical analysis in the Brazilian service sector. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(7), 524-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858621111162325

Von-Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: The source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.

Von-Hippel, E.; Katz, A. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817

Wathne, K. H.; Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 36-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.4.36.18070

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review, 73(2), 519-540.

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.