Effectuation and causation: Propositions about decision making process in business network environments Outros Idiomas

ID:
43190
Periódico:
Resumo:
This theoretical essay focuses on the dichotomous question concerning whether entrepreneurs adopt Effectuation or Causation decision making models. Decision making is an important theme in the studies of entrepreneurship. However, these models have not been explored in the context of business network environments. Due this gap, this essay proposes to examine the possible effects of the centrality of the firm on its organizational structure, and this latter on the predominance of entrepreneur’s Effectuation or Causation decision making in a business network environment. It is argued here that to the extent that the firm acquires relevant resources while enhances its centrality in the network, changes will take place in its organizational structure over time forcing the entrepreneur adopt Causation instead of Effectuation. Four propositions support this argument. Business networks are appropriated environments to find evidences of where and when entrepreneurs are more likely to adopt one or another decision making model. The potential practical implications of this study are described as follow: i) not all relations are equally important for the growth of the firm; ii) it is suitable for entrepreneurs use Effectuation model when the organizational structure is simple and resources are non-relevant; iii) it is recommended for entrepreneurs use Causation model in situations where failures could be critical to the growth of the firm. The theoretical framework focuses on the concept of inter-organizational networks, on the transformation of the organizational structure and on the principles of Effectuation and Causation.
Citação ABNT:
LEMOS, A. Q.; ANDREASSI, T. Effectuation and causation: Propositions about decision making process in business network environments. Revista de Negócios, v. 21, n. 1, p. 29-43, 2016.
Citação APA:
Lemos, A. Q., & Andreassi, T. (2016). Effectuation and causation: Propositions about decision making process in business network environments. Revista de Negócios, 21(1), 29-43.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2015v20n1p29-43
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/43190/effectuation-and-causation--propositions-about-decision-making-process-in-business-network-environments/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
AHUJA, G.; POLIDORO JR, F.; MITCH-ELL, W. Structural homophily or social asym-metry? The formation of alliances by poorly em-bedded firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30, p. 941-958, 2009.

ALDRICH, H.; ZIMMER, C. Entrepreneur-ship through social networks. In: R. Smilor and D. Sexton (Eds). The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, p. 3-23, 1986.

ANDERSON, A, R.; DODD, S. D.; JACK, S. L. Entrepreneurship as connecting: some impli-cations for theorising and practice. Management Decision, 50(5), 958-971, 2012.

ANDRADE, R. O. B.; ALYRIO, R. D.; MACEDO, M. A. S. Principles of trading: Tools and management. São Paulo: Atlas, 2014.

ANDREW, S. A. Regional integration through contracting networks: An empirical analysis of institutional collection action framework. Urban Affairs Review, 44, p. 378- 402, 2009.

ANTONCIC, B. Organizational processes in intrapreneurship: A conceptual integration. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 9(2), 221-235, 2001.

BALESTRIN, A.; VARGAS, L. M. The strategic dimension of SME’s horizontal networks: theory and evidences. Revista de Administração Contemporânea. Special issue, p. 203-227, 2004.

BALESTRIN, A.; VERSCHOORE, J. Cooperation business networks: Management strategies in the new economy. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008.

BARNEY, J. B. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, p. 656-65, 1986.

BARROSO, A. C. O.; GOMES, E. B. P. Tentando entender a gestão do conhecimento. RAP, 2, p. 147-70, 1999.

BASS, B. M. Organizational decision making. Illinois: Homewood, 1983.

BAUM J. R.; WALLY S. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24, p. 1107- 1129, 2003.

BEAUCHAMP, M. A. An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science, 10, p. 161-163, 1965.

BESANKO, D.; DRANOVE, D.; SHAN-LEY, M.; SCHAEFER, S. Economy of strategy. 5 ed. Bookman, 2010.

BILHIM, J. Organizational Theory: Structures and people. Lisboa: ISCSP, 1996.

BLAU, P. M. On the nature of organization. Nova York, john Wiley, 1974.

BLIEMEL, M. J.; MAINE, E. M. A. Net-work embeddedness as a predictor of performance for New Technology-Based Firms. Int. J. Technoentrepreneurship, v. 1 n. 3, p. 313-341, 2008.

BORGATTI, S. Strength of week ties, structural holes, closure and small worlds, 2010. Available in accessed in Aug. 28,2012. 2010.

BRESSER PEREIRA, L. C. Centralization and descentralization. In: Prestes Motta e Bresser Pereira (1963/1980). Originaly Published as a handout, São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, 1963.

BROWN, S. L.; EISENHARDT, K. M. Competitive strategy on the edge: a dynamic vision for corporate transformations. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2004.

BRUDERL, J.; PREISENDORFER, P. Net-work support and success of newly founded busi-nesses. Small Business Economics, 10, p. 213-225, 1998.

BRUYNE, P.; HERMAN, J.; SCHOU-THEETE, M. Dynamics of social science research. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1991.

BUCHANAN, J, M.; VANBERG, V. J. The Market as a creative process. Economics and Philosophy, 7(02), 167- 86, 1991.

BURT, R. S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.

CABLE, D. M.; Shane, S. A prisioner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, v. 22, n. 1, p. 142-176, 1997.

CÂMARA, A. A. Case Study: The role of organizational culture in the integration and socialization of the organization's members. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, Blumenau, v. 6, n. 4, p. 80-97, 2012.

CAMPS, J.; LUNA-AROCAS, R. High involvement work practices and firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 20, n. 5, p. 1056-1077, 2009.

CHANDLER, G. N.; DETIENNE, D. R.; MCKELVIE, A.; MUMFORD, T.V. Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, n. 26, p. 375-390, 2011.

COASE, R. H. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, New Series, v. 4, n.16, p. 386-405, 1937.

COHEN, M. D.; MARCH, J, G.; OLSEN, J. P. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 17, p. 1-25, 1972.

DANTAS, E.; BELL, M. The co-evolution of firm entered knowledge networks and capabilities in late industrializing countries: The case of Petrobras in the offshore oil innovation system in Brazil. World Development, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1570-1591, 2011.

DEW, N.; READ, S.; SARASVATHY, S. D.; WILTBANK, R. Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287-309, 2009.

DEW, N.; SARASVATHY, S. D. Innova-tions, stakeholders & entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, p. 267-283, 2007.

ETZIONI, A. Organizações Modernas. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1964.

FLAMHOLTZ, E. G.; DAS, T. K.; TSUI, A. S. Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, p. 35-50, 1985.

FREEMAN, E. R. Strategic management - A Stakeholder approach. London: Pitman Publishing, 1984.

FREEMAN, L. C. Centrality in social net-works: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, p. 215-239, 1978/1979.

FRIEDKIN, N. E. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. AJS, v. 96, n. 6, p. 1478-1504, 1991.

GALASKIEWICZ, J. Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.

GHEMAWAT, P. Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, v. 76, n. 1, p. 37-74, 2002.

GIACOMETTI et al. (2007). Aplicação do earned value em projetos complexos - um estudo de caso na EMBRAER. Gestão & Produção, São Carlos, 14(3), 595-607. 2007.

GIBSON, J. L.; IVANCEVICH, J. M.; DONNELLY, J. H. Organizações: Comportamento, estrutura, processos. São Paulo: Atlas, 1988.

GOEL, S.; KARRI, R. Entrepreneurs, effec-tual logic, and over-trust. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, p. 477-493, 2006.

GRANOVETTER, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

GRANT, M. Contemporary strategic analy-sis, Blackwell, Oxford, 2013.

HAGE, J. An axiomatic theory of organizations. Admin. Sci.Q, 8-289, 1965.

HALL, R. H. Organization: structures, pro-cesses and outcomes. 8 ed. São Paulo: Prentice Hall, 2004.

HANNEMAN, R. A.; RIDDLE, M. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside. (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman.), 2005.

HILLMAN, A.; KEIN, G. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, p. 125-139, 2001.

HILLS, G.; LAFORGE, R. W. Marketing and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Illinois, 1996.

HOANG, H.; ANTONCIC, B. Network-based research in entrepreneurship a critical re-view. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, p. 165-187, 2003.

HODGKINSON, G. P.; STARBUCK, W. H. Organizational decision making: Mapping terrains on different planets. In: The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making, 1, p.1-29, 2008.

HUMMON, N. P. (1990). Organizational structures and network processes. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15(2), 149-161, 1990.

JEN, C, T. The influence of conflict central-ity and task interdependency on individual perfor-mance and job satisfaction. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(2), 126-147.

KNIGHT, F. H. Risk, Uncertainty and profit. New York: Harper, 1921.

KOTTER, J. P. What effective general man-agers really do. Cambridge. Harvard Business Review, 1982.

KUCKERTZ, A. What‘s hot in entrepreneurship research? 2013. Available in: https://entrepreneurship.unihohenheim.de/uploads/media/What_s_hot_in_Entrepreneurship_Research_2013.pdf> Access November, 18, 2013.

KUHN, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3 ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

KUPPER, D.; BURKHART, T. Effectuation in the context of R&D projects: Characteristics and impact on project performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, august 1, p. 1-6, 2009.

LAKATOS, E. M. Sociology of administration. São Paulo: Atlas, 1997.

LANDSTROM, H.; BENNER, M. Entrepreneurship research: A history of scholarly migration. In Landstrom, H. e Lohrke, F. Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurship. Edgar d Elgar, Northhampton, 2010.

LAVIE, D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28, p.1187-1212, 2007.

LAWRENCE, P. R., LORSCH, J. W. Organization and environment. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1967.

LIMA, A. N.; IMONIANA, J. O. A study on the importance of using management control tools on micro, small and medium-sized industrial enterprises in São Caetano do Sul. Revista da Micro e Pequena Empresa, v. 2, n. 3, p. 28-48, 2008.

MAINE, E.; SOH, P. H., DOS SANTOS. 2014. The role of entrepreneurial decision-making in opportunity creation and recognition. Technovation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.02.007i

MARCH, J. G. The technology of foolishness. In: J.G. Marchand J. P. Olsen. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, 1982.

MCEVILY, B.; ZAHEER, A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, p. 1133-1156, 1999.

MELLO, S. C. B.; LEÃO, A. S.; B. PAIVA JR, F. G. (2006).Entrepreneurial skills of Brazilian leaders of medium and large companies working in service of the new economy. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 10(4). 2006.

MILLER, J. Access to interorganizational networks as a professional resource. American Sociological Review, 45, p. 479-496, 1980.

MINTZBERG, H. Patterns in strategy for-mation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948, 1978.

MINTZBERG, H.; QUINN, J. B. The strategy process: concepts, contexts and cases. 3 ed. Upper Sadlle River: Prentice-Hall, 1996.

MINTZBERG, H. Researching the information of strategies: The history of Canadian Lady, 1939-1976. in: Lamb, R. (ed.) Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.

MINTZBERG, H. The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, January-February, p. 107-114, 1994.

MINTZBERG, H.; WATERS, J. A. Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm. Academy of Management Journal, p. 465-499, 1982.

MOLINA -MORALES, F. X.; MARTINEZ-FERNANDEZ, T. M. Too much love in the neighbourhood can hurt: How an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30, p. 1013-1023, 2009.

NIEMINEN, J. On centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, p. 322-336, 1974.

OBSTFELD, D. (2005). Social networks, the Terti-us lungens and orientation involvement in innova-tion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100-130.

OLIVER, C. Determinants of interorganiza-tional relationships: Integration and future direc-tions. Academy of Management Review, 15, 241-265, 1990.

PADULA, A. D.; VADON, Jacques. (1996). A global organizational assessment methodology for management consulting in small and medium en-terprises. In: Revista de Administração, São Pau-lo, 31(1), 32-43.

PERRY, J. T.; CHANDLER, J. T.; MARKOVA, G. Entrepreneurial effectuation: A review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, july, p. 837-861, 2012.

PUGH, D. S.; DAVID J. H.; CHRISTO-PHER R. H., TURNER, C. Dimensions of organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, p. 65-105, 1968.

PUGH, D. S.; HICKSON, D. J.; HININGS, C. R.; TURNER, C. The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, p. 91-113, 1969.

RANSON, S.; HININGS, B.; GREEN-WOOD, R. The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 1-17, 1980.

RATCLIFF, R. E. Banks and corporate lending: An analysis of the impact of the internal structure of the capitalist class on the lending behavior of banks. American Sociological Review, 45, p. 553-570, 1980.

READ, S.; SARASVATHY, S. D. Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. Journal of Private Equity, p. 45-62, 2005.

RIBEIRO, E. M, B. A.; BASTOS, A. V. B. Interorganizational social networks in the realization of social projects. Psicol. Soc., v. 23, n. 2, p. 282-292, 2011.

RITZER, G. The McDonaldization of socie-ty. Journal of American Culture, v. 6, n. 1, p. 100-107, 1983.

SABIDUSSI, G. The centrality index of a graph, Psychometrika, v. 31, p. 581-603, 1966.

SARASVATHY, S. D. (2004).Making it happen: Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28(6), 519-531. 2004.

SARASVATHY, S. D. Causation and Effectuation: Towards a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, p. 243-288, 2001.

SARASVATHY, S. D. How do firms come to be?Towards a theory of the prefirm. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1998.

SCHEIN, E. Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992.

SCHLÜTER, J.; SCHMITZ, D.; BRETTEL, M.; JARKE, M.; KLAMMA, R. CEUR Proceedings of the 5th International. Workshop (iStar 2011).

SERGEANT, J. R.; FERRES, M. C. (1972). Organizational efficiency: A structuralist perspective. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 12(2), 99-110.

SHANE, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10-20.

SHANE, S.; VENKATARAMAN, S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, p. 217-226, 2000.

SHAW, M. E. Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. Journal of Psychology, 38, p. 139-149, 1954.

SILVA, C. A. V. Micro and small enterprise cooperation networks: A study of logistics activities in the metallurgical sector of Sertãozinho - SP. 2004. 199f. Dissertation (Master degree in Production Engineering) - Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos da Universidade de São Paulo. São Carlos: EESC/USP

SILVA, L. E. P. C. (1985). Business strategy and organizational structure under the marketing perspective. Rev. Adm. Empr. Rio de Janeiro, 25(1), 35-51.

SIMON, H. A. Administrative Behavior. 4 ed. (4th expanded edition; first edition 1947), The Free Press, N.Y, 1997.

SOH, P. H. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design. Strategic Management Journal, 31, p. 438-461, 2010.

SOH, P. H. The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, p. 727-744, 2003.

TASIC, I. A. B.; ANDREASSI, T. (2010). Strategy and entrepreneurship: Decision making and creation under uncertainty. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management 1(1), 12-23.

TIWANA, A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29, p. 251-272, 2008.

TSAI, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 44, p. 996-1004, 2001.

UHRY, R.; BULGACOV, S. Knowledge management and training capacities in banks. RAE-eletrônica, 2(1), 1-22, 2002.

VENKATARAMAN, S.; SARASVATHY, S. Strategy and entrepreneurship: Outlines of an untold story. Darden Business School Working Paper. Nº 01-06, 2001.

VENKATARAMAN, S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In: Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 3, p. 119-138. JAI Press Inc, 1997.

WASSERMAN, S.; FAUST, K. Social net-work analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. Structural analysis in social the social sciences series, 1994.

WEBER, M. The theory of social and eco-nomic organizations. Talcott Par sons, ed. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1947.

WEICK, K. E. The social psychology of or-ganizing. 2 ed. Reading, Mass: Addison- Wesley, 1979.

WERNERFELT, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, p. 171-180.

WILTBANK, R.; READ, S.; DEW, N.; & SARASVATHY, S. D. Prediction and control un-der uncertainty: Outcomes in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, p. 116-133, 2009.

WOERTMAN, S. The impact of networks on effectuation over causation processes. Master Thesis Business Administration, 2014. Available in Accessed in: march, 03. 2014.

ZAHRA, S. A. Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, p. 289-321, 1996.

ZAHRA, S.; WRIGHT, M. Entrepreneur-ship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, November, p. 67-83, 2011.