Análise de colaborações entre governo e ONGs e da densidade de ONGs no Brasil Outros Idiomas

ID:
45555
Resumo:
Esta pesquisa analisa os efeitos da densidade de organizações sem fins lucrativos (ONGs) e da colaboração entre governo e ONGs no desenvolvimento humano e na desigualdade de renda no Brasil. Estudos de governança afirmam que a colaboração do governo com ONGs leva a melhores resultados sociais. Esta pesquisa testa essa hipótese em 5.562 municípios brasileiros usando modelos lineares e espaciais. Análises espaciais permitem a identificação de efeitos específicos ocorrendo em diferentes regiões. A taxa de convênios entre o governo federal e ONGs em cada município brasileiro está associada a uma diminuição da desigualdade de renda, porém está também associada a uma significativa queda do nível de desenvolvimento humano. A densidade de ONGs de diferentes áreas de atividade apresenta diversas relações com desenvolvimento humano e desigualdade. Esses resultados permitem uma análise mais realista de arranjos de governança, considerando seus impactos nas comunidades e as realidades locais.
Citação ABNT:
COSTA, M. M.Análise de colaborações entre governo e ONGs e da densidade de ONGs no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 51, n. 3, p. 330-347, 2017.
Citação APA:
Costa, M. M.(2017). Análise de colaborações entre governo e ONGs e da densidade de ONGs no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 51(3), 330-347.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612155003
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/45555/analise-de-colaboracoes-entre-governo-e-ongs-e-da-densidade-de-ongs-no-brasil/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
ABOUASSI, Khaldoun. Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors NGO response to shifting funding priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 42, n. 3, p. 584-602, 2013.

ALMOG-BAR, Michal; SCHMID, Hillel. Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: a critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 43, n. 1, p. 11-35, 2013.

ANAND, Sudhir; SEN, Amartya. Human development index: methodology and measurement. Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 1994.

ANHEIER, Helmut K. Nonprofit organizations: theory, management, policy. Nova York: Routledge, 2014.

ANSELIN, Luc; REY, Sergio J. Modern spatial econometrics in practice: a guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. Chicago: GeoDa Press LLC, 2014.

ANSELIN, Luc. Spatial regression analysis in R–A workbook. Urbana. 2005. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 30 jan.2017.

ANSELIN, Luc; SYABRI, Ibnu; KHO, Youngihn. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, p. 5-22, 2006.

APPE, Susan; COSTA, Marcelo Marchesini da. Waves of nonprofit regulation and self-regulation in Latin America: evidence and trends from Brazil and Ecuador. In: BREEN, Oonagh; DUNN, Alison; SIDEL, Mark (Ed.). Regulatory waves comparative perspectives on state regulation and self-regulation policies in the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2016. p. 154-175.

ATACK, Iain. Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy. World Development, v. 27, n. 5, p. 855-864, 1999.

AZEVEDO, Dermi. A Igreja Católica e seu papel político no Brasil. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 18, n. 52, p. 109-120, 2004.

BALLER, Robert D. et al. Structural covariates of US county homicide rates: incorporating spatial effects. Criminology, v. 39, n. 3, p. 561-588, 2001.

BANKS, Nicola; HULME, David; EDWARDS, Michael. NGOs, states, and donors revisited: still too close for comfort? World Development¸ v. 66, p. 707-718, 2015.

BORIS, Elizabeth T. Nonprofit organizations in a democracy: varied roles and responsibilities. Nonprofits & government: collaboration and conflict. 2. ed. Washington DC: Urban Institute, 2006. p. 1-36.

BRUNSDON, Chris; FOTHERINGHAM, A. S.; CHARLTON, Martin E. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, p. 281-298, 1996.

BRUNSDON, Chris; FOTHERINGHAM, A. S.; CHARLTON, Martin E. Geographically weighted summary statistics—a framework for localised exploratory data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, v. 26, n. 6, p. 501-524, 2002.

CHARLTON, Martin; FOTHERINGHAM, Stewart; BRUNSDON, Chris. Geographically weighted regression. White Paper. National Centre for Geocomputation. National University of Ireland Maynooth, 2009.

CORNFORTH, Chris; HAYES, John Paul; VANGEN, Siv. Nonprofit-public collaborations understanding governance dynamics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 44, n. 4, p. 775-795, 2014.

COUTINHO, Raquel Z.; GOLGHER, André B. The changing landscape of religious affiliation in Brazil between 1980 and 2010: age, period, and cohort perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 31, n. 1, p. 73-98, 2014.

DALE, Mark R. T.; FORTIN, Marie-Josée. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

FRUMKIN, Peter. On being nonprofit: a conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. What is governance? Governance, v. 26, n. 3, p. 347-368, 2013.

GRIMM, Michael et al. A human development index by income groups. World Development, v. 36, n. 12, p. 2527-2546, 2008.

GUO, Chao; SAXTON, Gregory D. Voice-in, voice out: constituent participation and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-27, 2010.

IBGE. As fundações privadas e associações sem fins lucrativos no Brasil — 2010. 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 jan. 2010.

KEARNS, Kevin; PARK, Chisung; YANKOSKI, Linda. Comparing faith-based and secular community service corporations in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 34, n. 2, p. 206-231, 2005.

KOCH, Dirk-Jan et al. Keeping a low profile: what determines the allocation of aid by non-governmental organizations? World Development, v. 37, n. 5, p. 902-918, 2009.

KRISCHKE, Paulo J. Church base communities and democratic change in Brazilian society. Comparative Political Studies, v. 24, n. 2, p. 186-210, 1991.

LANDIM, Leilah et al. Brazil. In: SALAMON, Lester et al. Global civil society: dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, 1999.

LEVI-FAUR, David. From “big government” to “big governance”? In: LEVI-FAUR, David (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 3-18.

LUSTIG, Nora; LOPEZ-CALVA, Luis F.; ORTIZ-JUAREZ, Eduardo. Declining inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: the cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. World Development, v. 44, p. 129-141, 2013.

MARCHESINI DA COSTA, Marcelo. What influences the location of nonprofit organizations?A spatial analysis in Brazil. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, v. 27, n. 3, p. 1064-1090, 2016.

MILWARD, H. Brinton; PROVAN, Keith G. Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 10, n. 2, p. 359-380, 2000.

MOSLEY, Jennifer E. Keeping the lights on: how government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 22, n. 4, p. 841-866, 2012.

NEAL, Rachael. The importance of the state: political dimensions of a nonprofit network in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 37, n. 3, p. 492-511, 2007.

NICHOLSON-CROTTY, Jill. Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 36, n. 1, p. 5-21, 2007.

PERMANYER, Iñaki. Using census data to explore the spatial distribution of human development. World Development, v. 46, p. 1-13, 2013.

PLATAFORMA OSC. Plataforma por um novo marco regulatório para as organizações da sociedade civil. 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 jan. 2010.

RANIS, Gustav; STEWART, Frances; RAMIREZ, Alejandro. Economic growth and human development. World Development, v. 28, n. 2, p. 197-219, 2000.

R CORE TEAM. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, issued 2015. 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 jan. 2015.

RHODES, Roderick Arthur. Waves of governance. In: LEVI-FAUR, David (Ed.). Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012. RISSE, Thomas. Governance without a state?: policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. Nova York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2013.

RISSE, Thomas. Governance without a state?: policies and politics in areas of limited statehood. Nova York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2013.

ROTBERG, Robert I. Good governance means performance and results. Governance, v. 27, n. 3, p. 511-518, 2014.

SAIDEL, Judith R. Resource interdependence: the relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, v. 51, n. 6, p. 543-553, 1991.

SALAMON, Lester M.; ANHEIER, Helmut K. Civil society in comparative perspective. In: SALAMON, Lester M. et al. Global civil society: dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 1999. p. 3-39.

SALAMON, Lester M. et al. The state of global civil society and volunteering: latest findings from the implementation of the UN nonprofit handbook. Center for Civil Society Studies Working Paper, n. 49, 2013.

SALAMON, Lester M. The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction. In: SALAMON, Lester M. (Ed.). The tools of government: a guide to the new governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002.

SALAMON, Lester M.; TOEPLER, Stefan. Government-nonprofit cooperation: anomaly or necessity? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, v. 26, n. 6, p. 2155-2177, 2015.

SCHMID, Hillel; BAR, Michal; NIREL, Ronit. Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations implications for policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 37, n. 4, p. 581-602, 2008.

SCOTT, W. Richard et al. Advocacy organizations and the field of youth services: ongoing efforts to restructure a field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 35, n. 4, p. 691-714, 2006.

SOKOLOWSKI, S. Wojciech. Effects of government support of nonprofit institutions on aggregate private philanthropy: evidence from 40 countries. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, v. 24, n. 2, p. 359-381, 2013.

SUDA, Yuko. Devolution and privatization proceed and centralized system maintained: a twisted reality faced by Japanese nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, v. 35, n. 3, p. 430452, 2006.

UNDP. Human Development Index (HDI). 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 jan. 2017.

VERSCHUERE, Bram; DE CORTE, Joris. Nonprofit advocacy under a third-party government regime: cooperation or conflict? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, v. 26, n. 1, p. 222-241, 2012.