Econometric Estimation of Labor Productivity in the Brazilian Manufacturing Sector in the 2000s: a Kaldorian Approach Other Languages

In the 2000-2008 period, which covers the analysis of this paper, while the average real GDP growth in Brazil was 3.7 percent per year, labor productivity in the manufacturing industry had a negative variation of 1.0 percent per year. In Brazil, there has been a “cliché” evaluation ofthe relatively low economic growth rates in the period as being the result of low labor productivity growth in the last few decades. However, according to the so-called KaldorVerdoorn law, the reverse could also be true: low growth rates of labor productivity in Brazil could be an effect of low growth rates of the real GDP. Based on Kaldorian assumptions, we regressed the change in labor productivity of 21 Brazilian manufacturing industries, covering the 2000-2008 period, on three main variables: the real GDP (which captures the KaldorVerdoorn law), gross investment to value added ratio, and technological innovation. Our results confirmed the validity of the Kaldor-Verdoorn law, as the real GDP growth was the most significant variable to explain the behavior of labor productivity in the manufacturing industries in Brazil in the 2000s, followed by the gross investment rate.
ABNT Citation:
NASSIF, A.; FEIJÓ, C.; ARAUJO, E. Econometric Estimation of Labor Productivity in the Brazilian Manufacturing Sector in the 2000s: a Kaldorian Approach. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 17, n. 1, p. 9-32, 2018.
APA Citation:
Nassif, A., Feijó, C., & Araujo, E. (2018). Econometric Estimation of Labor Productivity in the Brazilian Manufacturing Sector in the 2000s: a Kaldorian Approach. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 17(1), 9-32.
Document type:
ABRAMOVITZ, M. Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, n. 46, p. 385-406, 1986.

ABRAMOVITZ, M. The search for the sources of growth: areas of ignorance, old and new. The Journal of Economic History, v. 52, n. 2, p. 217-243, 1993.

ARELLANO, M.; BOND, S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, v. 58, n. 2, p. 277-297, 1991.

ARELLANO, M.; BOVER, O. Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components model. Journal of Econometrics, v. 68, p. 29-52, 1995.

BACHA, E. L. Bonança externa e desindustrialização: uma análise do período 2005-2011. In: BACHA, E.; BOLLE M. B. de (Org.). O futuro da indústria no Brasil: desindustrialização em debate. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2013.

BARLEVY, G. On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Review, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1131-1164, 2007.

BAUM, C. F. An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. College Station, Tx: Stata Press, 2006.

BAUMOL, W. J. Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. The American Economic Review, v. 76, n. 5, p. 1072-1085, 1986.

BLUNDELL, R.; BOND, S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, v. 87, p. 115-143, 1998.

BONELLI, R.; FONSECA, R. Ganhos de produtividade e de eficiência: novos resultados para a economia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea), 1998 (Texto para discussão, n. 557).

BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. Globalization and competition. Why some emerging countries succeed while others fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

BRESSER-PEREIRA, L. C. The Dutch disease and its neutralization: a Ricardian approach. Revista de Economia Política, v. 28, n. 1, p. 47-71, 2008.

CARTON, C. Kaldorian mechanisms of regional growth: an empirical application to the case of ALADI 1980-2007. May 2009. (MPRA paper n. 15675).

CLARK, C. The conditions of economic progress. London: Macmillan. 1957.

DELONG, B. J.; SUMMERS, L. Equipment investment and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 106, n. 2, p. 445-502, May. 1991.

DIXON, R.; THIRLWALL, A. P. A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers, v. 27, n. 2, p. 201-214, July. 1975.

DOMAR, E. D. On the measurement of technological change. The Economic Journal, v. 71, n. 284, p. 709-729, 1961.

FELIPE, J.; MCCOMBIE, J. S. L. The aggregate production function and the measurement of technical change: “not even wrong”. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.

GALEANO, E.; FEIJO, C. A estagnação da produtividade do trabalho na indústria brasileira nos anos 1996-2007: análise nacional, regional e setorial. Nova Economia, v. 23, n. 1, p. 9-50, 2013.

GRAHAM, F. D. Some Aspects of Protection Further Considered. Quarterly Journal of Economics, n. 37, p. 199-227, February. 1923.

GRAZZI, M.; PIETROBELLI, C (Ed.). From firm innovation and productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean: the engine of development. IDB, 2016.

GREENE, W. H. Econometric analysis. Third Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997.

HAUSMAN, J. A. A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica, n. 46, p. 403-426, 1978.

HIRSCHMAN, A. O. A generalized linkage approach to development with special reference to staples. In: HIRSCHMAN, A. O. Essays in trespassing - Economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

KALDOR, N. Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. An inaugural lecture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1966.

KALDOR, N. The case for regional policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, n. 17, p. 337-348, November 1970.

KRUGMAN, P. The age of diminished expectations. The MIT Press, 1994.

LEÓN-LEDESMA, M. A. Accumulation, innovation and catching-up: an extended cumulative growth model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 26, p. 201-216, 2002.

LIBANIO, G. Three esasays on aggregate demand and growth. PhD. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame, 2006.

MCCOMBIE, J. L. S.; THIRLWALL, A. P. Economic growth and the balance-of-payment constraint. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994.

MCMILLAN, M.; RODRIK, D. Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. June. 2011. (NBER Workingpaper, n. 17.143).

MESSA, A. Metodologias de cálculo da produtividade total dos fatores e da produtividade da mão de obra. In: NEGRI, F. de; CAVALCANTE, L. R. Produtividade no Brasil: desempenho e determinantes. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea). v. 1. 2014.

MIGUEZ, T.; FREITAS, F.; SQUEFF, G. C.; VASCONCELOS, L. F.; MORAES, T. Uma proposta metodológica para a estimação da Matriz de Absorção de Investimentos para o período 2000-2009. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea), 2014. (Texto para Discussão, n. 1977). .

MONCAYO, E. Cambio estructural, crecimiento e industrialización en América Latina, 1950-2005. PhD. Dissertation. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2011.

MYRDAL, G. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Duckworth, 1957.

NASSIF, A. Há evidências de desindustrialização no Brasil? Revista de Economia Política (Brazilian Journal of Political Economy), v. 28, n. 1, p. 72-96, 2008.

NASSIF, A.; FEIJÓ, C.; ARAÚJO, E. Overvaluation trend of the Brazilian currency in the 2000s: empirical estimation for the long-term reference level of the real exchange rate and policy recommendations. Revista de Economia Política, v. 35, n. 1, p. 3-27, 2015.

NASSIF, A.; FEIJÓ, C.; ARAÚJO, E. Structural change and economic development: is Brazil catching or falling behind? Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 39, n. 5, p. 1307-1332, 2015.

NELSON, R. R. Research on productivity growth and productivity differences: dead ends and new departures. In: NELSON, R. The sources of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Economic Press, 1996.

OREIRO, J. L.; FEIJÓ, C. Desindustrialização: conceituação, causas, efeitos e o caso brasileiro. Revista de Economia Política, v. 30, n. 2, p. 219-232, abril-junho 2010.

PALMA, J. G. Four sources of deindustrialization and a new concept of the Dutch disease. In: OCAMPO, J. A. (Ed.). Beyond reforms. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. 2005. p. 71-116.

PAVITT, K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, n. 13, p. 343-373, 1984.

PHELPS-BROWN, E. H. P. The meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 71, n. 4, p. 546-560, 1957.

RODRIK, D. Premature de-industrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2016.

ROS, J. Productividad y crecimiento en América Latina: por que la productividad crece más en unas economías que em otras? México: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (Cepal), Naciones Unidas, 2014.

ROS, J. Rethinking economic development, growth and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

ROWTHORN, R.; WELLS, J. R. De-industrialization and foreign trade. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 1987.

SIMON, H. A.; LEVY, F. K. A note on the Cobb-Douglas Function. The Review of Economic Studies, v. 30, n. 2, p. 93-94, 1963.

SMITH, A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library, 1776 [1937].

SOLOW, R. M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, n. 70, p. 65-94, February 1956.

SOLOW, R. M. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, n. 39, p. 214-231, 1957.

SYVERSON, C. What determines productivity? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, January. 2010. (NBER Working Paper Series, n. 15.712).

WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. England: Mit Press, 2010.

YOUNG, A. A. Increasing returns and economic progress. The Economic Journal, v. 152, n. XXXVIII, p. 527-542, 1928.