Participação Eletrônica, Efetividade Governamental e Accountability Outros Idiomas

ID:
49145
Resumo:
No contexto atual emerge a Governança Responsiva, modelo orientado por princípios de responsabilização, transparência e participação, em que a efetividade se vincula a seu atributo-chave: a responsividade. Portanto, torna-se fundamental aprofundar o entendimento dessa mudança de paradigma, em particular no que tange ao papel desempenhado pelo governo. O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar as relações entre o desenvolvimento do governo eletrônico e três aspectos-chave: participação eletrônica, efetividade governamental e responsabilização dos agentes públicos (accountability). Para tanto, lançou-se mão de uma abordagem dedutiva e objetiva da qual derivou uma estratégia de trabalho de natureza quantitativa. Foram selecionados dados secundários, baseados em populações, e também foram adotados critérios de comparação complementares, a partir dos quais realizou-se um estudo comparativo global, de corte transversal (cross-sectional). Em suma, constatou-se que altos índices de desenvolvimento do governo eletrônico estão correlacionados a altos índices de participação eletrônica. Além disso, verificou-se que quanto mais elevado o nível de participação eletrônica, mais elevado o nível de efetividade governamental e também de responsabilização dos agentes públicos.
Citação ABNT:
BRAGA, L. V.; GOMES, R. C. Participação Eletrônica, Efetividade Governamental e Accountability. Revista do Serviço Público, v. 69, n. 1, p. 111-144, 2018.
Citação APA:
Braga, L. V., & Gomes, R. C. (2018). Participação Eletrônica, Efetividade Governamental e Accountability. Revista do Serviço Público, 69(1), 111-144.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v69i1.1017
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/49145/participacao-eletronica--efetividade-governamental-e-accountability/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
Abramson, J. B.; Arterton, C.; Orren, g. r. The electronic commonwealth: the impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

Alonso, L. B. N.; Ferneda, E.; Braga, L. V. Governo eletrônico e políticas públicas: análise sobre o uso da certificação digital no Brasil. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, v. 21, n. 2, p. 13-24, 2011.

Assmann, S.; Maslow, S. “Digital government” in Japan: a selective survey of Japanese Ministry web sites. Asian Politics & Policy, v. 2, n. 2, p. 291-294, 2010.

Bakri, S. H. Development of e-government: a STOPE view. International Journal of Network Management, v. 14, n. 5, p. 339-350, 2004.

Barzelay, M. The new public management: improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.

Basu, S. E‐government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 109-132, 2004.

Becker, T. Rating the impact of new technologies on democracy. Communication of the ACM, v. 44, Issue 1, p. 39-43, 2001.

Bevir, M.; Rhodes, R.A.W; Weller, P. Traditions of governance: interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, v. 81, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2003.

Bimber, B. Information and civic engagement in America: the search for political effect of the Internet. Political Research Quarterly, v. 54, n. 1, p. 53-67, 2001.

Bimber, B. The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication, v. 17, n. 4, p. 239-333, 2000.

Braga, L. V. et al. O papel do governo eletrônico no fortalecimento da governança do setor público. Revista do Serviço Público, v. 59, n. 1, p. 5-21, 2008.

Braga, L. V. Inclusão digital: fator essencial ao progresso do governo eletrônico no Brasil. Revista de Políticas Públicas e Gestão Governamental: Res Pvblica, v. 6, n. 2, p. 53-76, 2007.

Brasil. Certificação digital: a chave para um governo eletrônico seguro. Revista de Políticas Públicas e Gestão Governamental: Res Pvblica, v. 8, n. 2, p. 4559, 2009.

Bryman, A.; Cramer, D. Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19: a guide for social scientists. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.

Bryson, J. M.; Crosby, B. C.; Stone, M. M. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions form the literature. Public Administration Review, v. 66, Special Issue, p. 44-55, 2006.

Centerfor Democracyand Technology. The e-government handbook for developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank Information for Development Program, 2002.

Chadwick, A.; May, C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: “e-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, v. 16, n. 2, p. 271-300, 2003.

Coleman, S. Can the new media invigorate democracy? Political Quarterly, v. 70, n. 2, p. 16-22, 1999.

Coleman, S. New mediation and direct representation: reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media and Society, v. 7, n. 2, p. 177-198, 2005.

Compaine, B. M. (Ed.). The digital divide: facing a crisis or creating a myth? Cambridge: MIT Press Sourcebooks, 2001.

Cook, I.; Horobin, G. Implementing e-government without promoting dependence: open source software in developing countries in Southeast Asia. Public Administration and Development, v. 26, n. 4, p. 279-289, 2006.

Dahl, R. A. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.

Dale, A; Arber, S; Proctor, M. Doing secondary analysis. New York: HarperCollins, 1988.

Dawes, S. S.; Gregg, V.; Agouris, P. Digital government research: investigations at the crossroads of social and information science. Social Science Computer Review, v. 22, n. 1, p. 5-10, 2004.

Dawes, S. S. The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, v. 68, Special Issue, p. 86-102, 2008.

Dunleavy, P. et al. New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 16, n. 3, p. 467-494, 2006.

Dyson, E. Release 2.1: a design for living in the digital age. London: Penguin, 1998.

Emerson, K.; Nabatchi, T.; Balogh, S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2012.

European Communities. The role of e-government for Europe's future. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2003. European Union. European governance: a white paper. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2001.

Fattore, G.; Dubois, H. F. W.; Lapenta, A. Measuring new public management and governance in political debate. Public Administration Review, v. 72, n. 2, p. 218-227, 2012.

Ferneda, E.; Alonso, L. B. N.; Braga, L. V. Digital certification in the Brazilian e-government. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, v. 8, n. 2, p. 331-346, 2011.

Fishkin, J. S. Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.

Frederickson, H.G. Toward a theory of the public for public administration. Administration & Society, v. 22, n. 4, p. 395-417, 1991.

Fung, A.; Wright, E. O. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York: Verso, 2001.

Gibson, R. K. Elections online: assessing Internet voting in light of the Arizona Democratic primary. Political Science Quarterly, v. 116, n. 4, p. 561-583, 2001.

Gibson, R. K.; Lusoli, W.; Ward, S. J. Online participation in the UK: testing a “contextualised” model of Internet effects. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, v. 7, n. 4, p. 561-583, 2005.

Gibson, R. K. New media and the revitalization of politics. Representation, v. 45, n. 3, p. 289-299, 2009.

Hague, B.; Loader, B. Digital democracy: Discussion and decision making in the Internet age. Abingdon: Routledge, 1999.

Hammerman, C. Lessons learned in Michigan: best practices for local e-government. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 31, n. 3, p. 17-19, 2005.

Heintze, T.; Bretschneider, S. Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 10, n. 4, p. 801-830, 2000.

Hyson, S. The ombudsman and e-government in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, v. 53, n. 2, p. 183-200, 2010.

Jaeger, P. T. The endless wire: e-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, v. 20, n. 4, p. 323-331, 2003.

Johnston, E. Governance infrastructures in 2020. Public Administration Review, v. 70, Special Issue, p. 122-128, 2010.

Kang, S.; Gearhart, S. E-government and civic engagement: how is citizens' use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, v. 54, n. 3, p. 443-462, 2010.

Kaufmann, D.; Kraay, A.; Mastruzzi, M. Worldwide governance indicators 2011 update: aggregate governance indicators 1996-2010. Washington, DC: The World Bank Development Research Group, 2011.

Kellogg, W. A.; Mathur, A. Environmental justice and information technologies: overcoming the information access paradox in urban communities. Public Administration Review, v. 63, n. 5, p. 573-85, 2003.

Kersten, G. E. E-democracy and participatory decision processes: lessons from e-negotiation experiments. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, v. 12, n. 2-3, p. 127-143, 2003.

Kettl, D. F. 2002. The transformation of governance: public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.

Kettl, D. F. Managing boundaries in American administration: the collaborative imperative. Public Administration Review, v. 66, Special Issue, p. 10-19, 2006.

Kraut, R. et al. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, v. 53, n. 9, p. 1017-1072, 1998.

Krueger, B. S. Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: a resource approach. American Politics Research, v. 30, n. 5, p. 476498, 2002.

Lambrinoudakis, C. et al. Security requirements for e-government services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer Communications, v. 26, n. 16, p. 1873-1883, 2003.

Lazarsfeld, P. Evidence and inference in social research. Daedalus, v. 87, Fall 1958, p. 99-130, 1958.

Lee, J. Internet politics: is it another new media with politics, or business, as usual? Review of Communication, v. 9, n. 2, p. 164-167, 2009.

Lévy, P. Ciberdemocracia. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 2004.

Lim, J. H.; Tang, S. Democratization and environmental policy-making in Korea. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Institution, and Administration, v. 15, n. 4, p. 561-82, 2002.

Lim, J. H. Urban e-government initiatives and environmental decision performance in Korea. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 18, n. 1, p. 109-138, 2008.

Löfstedt, U. E-government – assessment of current research and some proposals for future directions. International Journal of Public Information Systems, v. 2005, n. 1, p. 39-52, 2005.

Marlin-Bennett, r.; Thornton, E. N. Governance within social media websites: ruling new frontiers. Telecommunications Policy, v. 36, Issue 6, p. 493-501, 2012.

Miguel-Molina, M. E-government in Spain: an analysis of the right to quality e-government. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2010.

Misuraca, G. C. E-government 2015: exploring m-government scenarios, between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implications. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 21, n. 3, p. 407-424, 2009.

Nabatchi, T. Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: exploring the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, v. 40, n. 4, p. 376-99, 2010.

National Information Society Agency. Concepts and features of government 2.0 and 3.0. Seoul: The National Information Society Agency, 2008.

Negroponte, N. Being Digital. London: Coronet, 1995.

Norris, P. Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Norris, P. The bridging and bonding role of online communities. The Harvard Norris, P.International Journal of Press/Politics, v. 7, n. 3, p. 3-13, 2002.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Promise and problems of e-democracy: challenges of online citizen engagement. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2003.

Osborne, S. P. The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, v. 8, Issue 3, p. 377-387, 2006.

Petley, J. Panic stations: surveillance in the UK. Index on Censorship, v. 42, n. 1, p. 70-74, 2013.

Pina, V.; Torres, L.; Royo, S. Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration, v. 85, n. 2, p. 449-472, 2007.

Polat, R. K. The Internet and democratic local governance: the context of Britain. The International Information & Library Review, v. 37, n. 2, p. 87-97, 2005.

Rash, W. Politics on the nets: wiring the political process. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997.

Reece, B. E-government literature review. Journal of E-Government, v. 3, n. 1, p. 69110, 2006.

Rheingold, H. The virtual community: finding connection in a computerised world. London: Minerva, 1995.

Robertson, S. P.; Vatrapu, R. K. Digital government. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, v. 44, Issue 1, p. 317-364, 2010.

Schuefele, D. A.; Nisbet, M. Being a citizen online: new opportunities and dead ends. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, v. 7, n. 3, p. 55-75, 2002.

Scott, J. K. ‘‘E’’ the people: do U.S. municipal government websites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, v. 66, n. 3, p. 341-53, 2006.

Shah, D.; Kwak, N; Holbert, R. L. “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, v. 18, n. 2, p. 141-162, 2001.

Sirianni, C. Investing in democracy engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2009.

Skocpol, T. Diminished democracy: from membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2002.

Stahl, B. C. The paradigm of e-commerce in e-government and e-democracy. In: Huang, W.; Siau, K.; Wei, K. K. Electronic government strategies and implementation. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing, 2005. p. 1-19.

Stanley, W.; Weare, C. The effects of Internet use on political participation: evidence from an agency online discussion forum. Administration & Society, v. 36, n. 5, p. 503-27, 2004.

Starr, P. The liberal state in a digital world. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-6, 2010.

Toffler, A.; Toffler, H. Creating a new civilization: the politics of the third wave. Atlanta: Turner Publications, 1995.

Tolbert, C. J; McNeal, R. S. Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, v. 56, n. 2, p. 175-186, 2003.

United Nations; American Society for Public Administration. Benchmarking e-government: a global perspective. New York: United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration, 2002.

United Nations Population Division. World population prospects: the 2012 revision. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2013.

United Nations. Public governance indicators: a literature review. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2007.

United Nations. UN e-government survey 2008: from e-government to connected governance. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2008.

United Nations. UN e-government survey 2012: e-government for the people. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012.

United Nations. UN global e-government readiness report 2004: towards access for opportunity. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2004.

United Nations. UN global e-government readiness report 2005: from e-government to e-inclusion. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2005a.

United Nations. UN global e-government survey 2003. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2003.

United Nations. Unlocking the human potential for public sector performance. World public sector report 2005. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2005b.

Warschauer, M. Tecnologia e inclusão social: a exclusão digital em debate. São Paulo: Senac, 2006.

Weber, L.; Loumake, A.; Bergman, J. Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, v. 21, n. 1, p. 26-42, 2001.

Wellman, B. et al. Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, v. 45, n. 3, p. 436-455, 2001.

World Bank. Use of ICT enabled tools for conducting Public Consultations. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013.