Título Inglês:
Institutional Complexity in Credit Cooperatives: a Case Study
Resumo:
As cooperativas de crédito são norteadas por princípios, e regulamentada por diversas leis, circulares e resoluções. Estas operam num ambiente repleto por diversas lógicas institucionais, o que o torna complexo. Neste estudo se buscou compreender como está configurada a complexidade institucional nas cooperativas de crédito, centrais e periféricas, pertencentes à Sicredi Paranapanema PR/SP no ambiente em que estas estão imersas. Para tal, realizou primeiramente uma etapa quantitativa, que visou apresentar a centralidade da rede de relacionamentos da Sicredi Paranapanema PR/SP. A segunda etapa foi cunho de qualitativo, em que realizou um estudo de caso comparativo em quatro cooperativas de crédito, duas cooperativas centrais e duas cooperativas periféricas. Os resultados evidenciaram que o ambiente das cooperativas de crédito é permeado por diversas lógicas institucionais e que algumas dessas lógicas institucionais estão em conflito, ou seja, a complexidade institucional está configurada em todos os casos estudados.
Resumo Inglês:
Credit Cooperatives are guided by principles and regulated by various laws, circulars and resolutions. These operate in an environment replete with various institutional logics, which makes it complex. This study sought to understand how the institutional complexity of credit cooperatives, central and peripheral, belonging to Sicredi Paranapanema PR/SP in the environment in which these are immersed is configured. To do this, it first performed a quantitative step, which aimed to present the centrality of the network of relationships of Sicredi Paranapanema PR/SP. The second stage was qualitative, in which a comparative case study was carried out in four credit cooperatives, two central cooperatives and two peripheral cooperatives. The results evidenced that the credit cooperative environment is permeated by several institutional logics and that some of these institutional logics are in conflict, that is, institutional complexity is configured in all cases studied.
Citação ABNT:
SILVA, F. R.; CRUBELLATE, J. M. Complexidade Institucional em Cooperativas de Crédito: um Estudo de Caso. Gestão & Conexões, v. 8, n. 1, p. 7-23, 2019.
Citação APA:
Silva, F. R., & Crubellate, J. M. (2019). Complexidade Institucional em Cooperativas de Crédito: um Estudo de Caso. Gestão & Conexões, 8(1), 7-23.
DOI:
10.13071/regec.2317-5087.2019.8.1.1776.7-23
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/52118/complexidade-institucional-em-cooperativas-de-credito--um-estudo-de-caso/i/pt-br
Referências:
Almandoz, J. (2014) Founding Teams as Carriers of Competing Logics: When Institutional Forces Predict Banks’ Risk Exposure. Administrative Science Quartely, 59(3), 442–473.
Banco Central do Brasil (BACEN). Cooperativa de Crédito, Poupança e Investimento Paranapanema PR/SP Sicredi Paranapanema PR/SP.
Bardin, L. (1997). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Battilana, J. et al. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: the case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658-1685.
Battilana, J.; Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
BCB, B. C. DO B. Patrimônio líquido, ativos, depósitos e operações de crédito das cooperativas de crédito. Disponível em:
.
Bertels, S.; Lawrence, T. B. (2016). Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics: The role of individuals. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 336–372.
Delbridge, R., & Edwards, T. (2013). Inhabiting Institutions: critical realist refinements to understanding institutional complexity and change. Organization Studies, 34(7), 927–947.
Dimaggio, P. J., Powell, & Greenwood (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: the contestation of care and science logics in medical education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 114-149.
Frieland, R. & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell, Greenwood, & Dimaggio, P. J. (Eds.). The new institucionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 232-263.
Greenwood, R. et al. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism. In: Greenwood, R. et al. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, p. 243–275.
Kurimoto, A. et al. (2015). Guidance Notes to the Co-operative Principles. Ed. London: International Co-operative Alliance.
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289-307.
Martin, G. et al. (2016). Institutional complexity and individual responses: delineating the boundaries of partial autonomy. Organization Studies, 38(1), 125.
May, T. (2004). Pesquisa Social: questões, métodos e processos. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Minayo, M. C. S. (2004). O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 8. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec.
Mirzruchi, M. S. (2006). Análise de redes sociais: avanços recentes e controvérsias atuais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 46(3), 72-86.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Process. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). Whem worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to confliction institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476.
Pesavento, F. (2010). Memória histórica: cooperativas de crédito no Brasil e o surgimento do Sicredi. 1. ed. Porto Alegre: Sicredi.
Port, M. (2016). Cooperativismo financeiro manteve crescimento em 2016.
Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A. & Brusoni, S. (2017). Institutional complexity in turbulent times: formalization, collaboration and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1253-1284.
Richardson, R. J. (2008). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Saraiva, A. Junior, & Crubellate, J. M. (2012). Esquemas interpretativos e estratégias institucionais em um sistema de cooperativas de crédito. Revista Brasileira de Estratégia, 5(2), 127–140.
Schildt, Greenwood, .D., & Perkmann, M. (2017). Organizational Settlements: How organizations respond to institutional complexity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 139-145, Abr.
Seo, M. G., Creed, & Greenwood, E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dilectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-247, abr.
SICREDI, P. P. Relatório Anual 2016 Sicredi Paranapanema PR/SP. Cornélio Procópio.
SICREDI. Programa a União faz a Vida. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 14 dez. 2017.
Smets, M. & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66, 10, 1279-1309.
Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practive to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877-904.
Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20.
Thornton, P. & Greenwood, R. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford University Press.
Thornton, P., Greenwood, R. & Ocasio, G. (2008). Institutional logics. In: Powell, Greenwood. Greenwood. & Dimaggio, P. J. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 99-128.
Thornton, P., Greenwood, R., & Ocasio, G. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958– 1990 1. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
Thornton, P., Ocasio, G., Greenwood, R. Lounsbury, M. (2012). The lnstitutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tureta, C., Rosa, A. R., Ávila, S. C. (2006). Da teoria sistêmica ao conceito de redes interorganizacionais: um estudo exploratório da teoria das organizações. Revista de Administração Da Unimep, 4(1), 1-16.
Vieira, M. M. F. (2004). Por uma boa pesquisa (qualitativa) em administração. In: Vieira, M. M. F., & Zouani, D. M. (Eds.). Pesquisa qualitativa em administração: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 13-28.
Yin, R. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2. Ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
