The Impact of CAGE Institutional Distances and Motivations for Internationalization on the Brazilian Foreign Direct Investment Outflows Outros Idiomas

ID:
52761
Resumo:
In this study, we have analyzed the influence of institutional distances and strategic motivations for internationalization on Brazilian foreign direct investment (FDI). We suggest that institutional differences, between Brazil and the host country, measured with Ghemawhat’s (2001) CAGE typology, have a negative impact on FDI flows. However, we propose that the market-seeking and strategic asset-seeking motivations (e.g., new knowledge acquisition) moderate the impact of institutional differences on investment decisions by reducing the impact of the institutional distances between countries on investment decisions.
Citação ABNT:
FERREIRA, M. P.; FALCÃO, M. B. The Impact of CAGE Institutional Distances and Motivations for Internationalization on the Brazilian Foreign Direct Investment Outflows . Brazilian Business Review, v. 16, n. 2, p. 154-173, 2019.
Citação APA:
Ferreira, M. P., & Falcão, M. B. (2019). The Impact of CAGE Institutional Distances and Motivations for Internationalization on the Brazilian Foreign Direct Investment Outflows . Brazilian Business Review, 16(2), 154-173.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.2.4
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/52761/the-impact-of-cage-institutional-distances-and-motivations-for-internationalization-on-the-brazilian-foreign-direct-investment-outflows-/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
ALEKSYNSKA, M.; HAVRYLCHYK, O. FDI from the south: The role of institutional distance and natural resources, European Journal of Political Economy, v. 29, n. C, p. 38-53, 2013.

ARTIGE, L.; NICOLINI, R. Evidence on the determinants of foreign direct investment:The case of three European regions. Unitat de Fonaments de l’Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d’Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC) UFAE and IAE Working Papers, n. 655, 2005.

BCG. Redefining global competitive dynamics. Boston, MA: The Boston Consulting Group, 2014.

BÉNASSY-QUÉRÉ, A.; COUPET, M.; MAYER T. Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. The World Economy, v. 30, n. 5, p. 764-782, 2007.

BERRY, H.; GUILLEN, M.; ZHOU, N. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 41, n. 9, p. 1460-1480, 2010.

BLONINGEN, B. A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants. International Atlantic Economic Society session, v. 33, n. 4, p. 383-403, 2005.

BOISOT, M.; MEYER, M. Which way through the open door?Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 349-365, 2008.

BROUTHERS, L.; O’DONNELL, E.; HADJIMARCOU, J. Generic product strategies for emerging market exports into triad nation markets: A mimetic isomorphism approach. Journal of Management Studies, v. 42, n. 1, p. 225-245, 2005.

BUCKLEY, P.; CLEGG, L.; CROSS, A.; LIU, X.; VOSS H.; ZHENG, P. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 38, n. 4, p. 499-518, 2007.

CAMPBELL, J.; EDEN, L.; MILLER, S. Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 84-106, 2012.

CASANOVA, L. From multilatinas to global latinas: The new Latin American multinationals. Washington: Interamerican Development Bank, 2009.

CASANOVA, L. Global latinas: Latin America’s emerging multinationals. Londres, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

CEZAR, R; ESCOBAR, O. Institutional Distance and Foreign Direct Investment. Banque de France, nº 579, 2015.

CHILD, J.; RODRIGUEZ, S. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, v. 1, n. 3, p. 381-410, 2005.

CONTI, C.; PARENTE, R.; VASCONCELOS, F. When distance does not matter: Implications for Latin American multinationals. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1980-1992, 2016.

CONTRACTOR, F.; LAHIRI, S.; ELANGO, B.; KUNDU, S. Institutional, cultural and industry related determinants of ownership choices in emerging market FDI acquisitions. International Business Review, v. 23, n. 5, p. 931-941, 2014.

CROSS, A.; VOSS, H. Chinese direct investments in the United Kingdom: An assessment of motivations and competiveness.Corporate Strategies in the New Asia. Alemanha: Universidade de Bremen. Working paper, 2008.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A. Multilatinas as a source of new theoretical insights: The learning and escape drivers of international expansion. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1963-1972, 2016.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A. Multilatinas as sources of new research insights: The learning and escape drivers of international expansion. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1963-1972, 2016.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A. The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: The case of multilatinas. Journal of International Management, v. 14, n. 2, p. 138-154, 2008.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A.; DAU, L. Promarket reforms and firm profitability in developing countries. Academy of Management Journal, v. 52, n. 6, p. 1348-1368, 2009.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A.; GENC, M. Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 39, n. 6, p. 957-979, 2008.

CUERVO-CAZURRA, A.; NARULA, R.; UN, C. Internationalization motives: Sell more, buy better, upgrade and escape. Multinational Business Review, v. 23, p. 25-35, 2015.

DAMANPOUR, F.; WALKER, R.; AVELLANEDA, C. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, v. 46, n. 4, p. 650-675, 2009.

DENG, P. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, v. 44, n. 1, p. 74-84, 2009.

DIKOVA, D.; WITTELOOSTUIJIN, A. Foreign direct investment mode choice: Entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 38, n. 6, p. 1013-1033, 2007.

DOW, D. A note on psychological distance and export market selection. Journal of International Marketing, v. 8, n. 1, p. 51-64, 2000.

DOW, D.; KARUNARATNA, A. Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 37, n. 5, p. 578-602, 2006.

DUNNING, J. The factors to attract FDI, multinational enterprises and the global economy. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley, 1993.

DUNNING, J. Towards a new paradigm of development: Implications for the determinants of international business. Transnational Corporations, v. 15, n. 1, p. 173-227, 2006.

DUNNING, J.; KIM, C.; PARK, D. Old wine in new bottles: A comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developed-country TNCs thirty years ago. In: SAUVANT, K. The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: Threat or opportunity? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008. p. 158-180.

FERREIRA, M. Building and leveraging knowledge capabilities through cross-border acquisitions. In TALLMAN, S. New Generation in International Strategy, New York, NY: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2008. p. 162-179.

FLEURY, A.; FLEURY, M.T.; BORINI, F. The Brazilian multinationals’ approaches to innovation. Journal of International Management, v. 19, n. 3, p. 260-275, 2013.

GATIGNON, H.; ANDERSON, E. The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, v. 4, n. 2, p. 305-336, 1998.

GHEMAWAT, P. CAGE comparator™ - Analyze distances and differences between countries. .

GHEMAWAT, P. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion, Harvard Business Review, v. 79, n. 8, p. 137-147, 2001.

GHEMAWAT, P. The forgotten strategy. Harvard Business Review, v. 81, n. 11, p. 76-84. 2003.

GOUVEA, R. The transnationalization of Brazil’s software industry, Transnational Corporations Journal, v. 16, n. 1, p.145-164, 2007.

GUGLER, P.; BRUNNER, S. FDI effects on national competitiveness: A cluster approach. International Advances in Economic Research, v.13, n. 3, p. 268-284, 2007.

HARZING, A. Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: International strategy and management of entry modes. Strategic Management Journal, v.23, n. 3, p. 211-227, 2002.

HOFSTEDE, G. Cultural consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.

IMF.International Monetary Fund. IMF Exchange rates.
IMF.International Monetary Fund. Outward foreign direct investment and domestic investment: The case of developing countries. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 2013.

JOHANSON, J.; VAHLNE, J.-E. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 8, n. 1, p. 23-32, 1977.

KOGUT, B.; SINGH, H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, v.19, n. 3, p. 411-432, 1988.

KOSTOVA, T.; ROTH, K. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, v.45, n. 1, p. 215-233, 2002.

KOSTOVA, T.; ZAHEER, S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, v.24, n. 1, p. 64-81, 1999.

LUO, Y. TUNG, R. International expansion of emerging markets enterprise: a springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, v.38, n. 4, p. 481-198, 2007.

MAKINO, S.; LAU, C.-M.; YEH, R.-S. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, v.33, n. 3, p. 403-421, 2002.

MARCH, J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, v.2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 1991.

MATHEWS, J. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, v.23, n. 1, p. 5-27, 2006.

MATHEWS, J. Response to Professors Dunning and Narula. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, v.23, n. 2, p. 153-155, 2006.

MEYER K.; ESTRIN S.; IONASCU, D. Institutional distance and international business strategies in emerging economies. William Davidson Institute, Escola de Negócios da Universidade de Michigan. Working Paper, 2004.

MEYER, J.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v.83, n. 2, p. 340-363, 1977.

NETER, J.; WASSERMAN, W.; KUTNER, M. Applied linear statistical models, Homewood: Irwin, 1985.

NORTH, D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

OTALORA, M.; CASANOVA, L. Resources and Internatiobalization Strategies: The case of Latin American Multinationals. INSEAD Working Paper, 2012.

PENG, M.; WANG, D.; JIANG, Y. An institution-based view of the international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 39, n. 5, p. 920-936, 2008.

PINTO, C.; FERREIRA, M.; FALASTER, C.; FLEURY, M.T.; FLEURY, A. Ownership in cross-border acquisitions and the role of government support. Journal of World Business, v. 52, n. 4, p.533-545, 2017.

SALOMON, R.; WU, Z. Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 43, n. 4, p. 343-367, 2012

STAL, E.; CAMPANÁRIO, M. Empresas multinacionais de países emergentes: o crescimento das multilatinas. Economia Global e Gestão, Lisboa, v. 15, n. 1, p. 55-73, 2010.

TAYLOR, R. Globalization strategies of Chinese companies: Current developments and future prospects. Asian Business and Management, v. 1, n. 2, p. 209-225, 2002.

UNCTAD. Inward and outward foreign direct investment flows, annual, 1970-2012. . Acesso em:16dez.2013.

UNCTAD. Occasional note Outward FDI from Brazil: Poised to take off? . Acesso em:22dez.2013.

UNCTAD. World Investment Report. Nova Iorque e Geneva: United Nations Press, 2006.

UNCTAD. World Investment Report. Nova Iorque e Geneva: United Nations Press, 2012.

WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization. Statistics on worldwide patent activity. . Acesso em: 31jan.2013.

WITT, M.; LEWIN, A. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 38, n. 4, p. 579-594, 2007.

WORLD BANK. WDI - World Development indicators. . Acesso em: 27nov.2013.

XU, D.; SHENKAR, O. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 4, p. 608-618, 2002.

YIU, D.; LAU, H.; BRUTON, G. International venturing by emerging economy firms: The effects of firm, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 38, n. 4, p. 519-540, 2007.