Sticky Costs Behavior and Earnings Management Outros Idiomas

ID:
52763
Resumo:
This study aims to analyze the relationship between cost asymmetry (Sticky Costs) behavior and earnings management practices of Brazilian companies. The methodology refers to descriptive, documentary and quantitative research. The sample comprised 160 Brazilian companies listed on BM&FBovespa between 2008 and 2017. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the data. We observed that accounting profit is affected by sticky costs behavior and by earnings management practices. Total accruals and part of earnings management are explained by costs asymmetric behavior. This paper contributes to the current research on the discussion that part of earnings management can be due to sticky costs. In addition, the results show that the Dechow, Sloan and Sweeney (1995) model could consider the asymmetry of costs as an interference variable on total accruals, in order to better estimate the discretionary accruals.
Citação ABNT:
SILVA, A.; ZONATTO, V. C. S.; MAGRO, C. B. D.; KLANN, R. Sticky Costs Behavior and Earnings Management. Brazilian Business Review, v. 16, n. 2, p. 191-206, 2019.
Citação APA:
Silva, A., Zonatto, V. C. S., Magro, C. B. D., & Klann, R. (2019). Sticky Costs Behavior and Earnings Management. Brazilian Business Review, 16(2), 191-206.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.2.6
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/52763/sticky-costs-behavior-and-earnings-management/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
ANDERSON, M. C.; BANKER, R. D.; JANAKIRAMAN, S. N. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, v. 41, n. 1, p. 47-63, 2003.

BANKER, R. D.; BASU, S.; BYZALOV, D.; CHEN, J. Y. The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 6, n. 1, p. 203-220, 2016.

BANKER, R. D.; BYZALOV, D. Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, v. 26, n. 2, p. 43-79, 2014.

BANKER, R. D.; CHEN, L. Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness. The accounting review, v. 81, n. 2, p. 285-307, 2006.

BAPTISTA, E. M. B. Análise do perfil das empresas brasileiras segundo o nível de gerenciamento de resultados. 303 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2008.

BUSHMAN, R.; CHEN, Q.; ENGEL, E.; SMITH, A. (2004). Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 37, n. 2, p. 167-201, 2004.

CALLEJA, K.; STELIAROS, M.; THOMAS, D. C. A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, v. 17, n. 2, p. 127-140, 2006.

CANNON, J. N. Determinants of “sticky costs”: An analysis of cost behavior using United States air transportation industry data. The Accounting Review, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1645-1672, 2014.

CHEN, C. X.; LU, H.; SOUGIANNIS, T. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 29, n. 1, p. 252-282, 2012.

DECHOW, P. M.; SLOAN, R. G.; SWEENEY, A. P. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, p. 193-225, 1995.

DOYLE, J. T.; GE, W.; MCVAY, S. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review, v. 82, n. 5, p. 1141-1170, 2007.

HE, D.; TERUYA, J.; SHIMIZU, T. Sticky selling, general and administrative cost behavior and its changes in Japan. Global Journal of Business Research, v. 4, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2010.

HEALY, P. M.; WAHLEN, J. M. A review of earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, v. 13, p. 365-383, 1999.

JONES, J. J. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, p. 193-228, 1991.

KAMA, I.; WEISS, D. Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs?. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 51, n. 1, p. 201-224, 2013.

KHAN, M.; WATTS, R. L. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of accounting and Economics, v. 48, n. 2-3, p. 132-150, 2009.

LEUZ, C. IAS versus US GAAP: information asymmetry-based evidence from Germany’s new market. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 41, n. 3, p. 445-472, 2003.

LEUZ, C.; NANDA, D.; WYSOCKI, P. Investor protection and earnings management: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 69, n. 3, p. 505-527, 2003.

MALIK, M. A review and synthesis of ‘cost stickiness’ literature. Social Science Research Network, p. 1-41, 2012.

MARTINEZ, A. L. Minimizando a variabilidade dos resultados contábeis: estudo empírico do income smoothing no Brasil. Revista Universo Contábil, v. 2, n. 1, p. 09-25, 2006.

PORPORATO, M.; WERBIN, E. M. Active cost management in banks: evidence of sticky costs in Argentina, Brazil and Canada. AAA Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1659228, 2010.

SCHIPPER, K. Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons, v. 3, n. 4, p. 91-102, 1989.

SUBRAMANIAM, C.; WEIDENMIER, M. L. Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Cost. In: M. J. Neeley School of Business. Texas Christian University, 2003.

WATTS, R. L.; ZIMMERMAN, J. L. Positive accounting theory: a ten-year perspective. Accounting review, p. 131-156, 1990.

WEISS, D. Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, v. 85, n. 4, p. 14411471, 2010.