More Distant than Shoddy Rice: A Case of Psychological Distance for Teaching Other Languages

ID:
58495
Abstract:
This case for teaching aims to report the psychological distance present in the context of international business management. For this, a semi-structured interview was conducted with the manager of a refined rice oil industry. The narrative comes from the creation of a Brazilian agribusiness until its internationalization. The retraction of the case serves for educational purposes, with the intention of contributing in the teaching-learning process, observing how cultural and language differences can interfere negatively in the management of internationalized companies. The disciplines suggested for use of the case should address strategic management of international business, international human resources management, and internationalization of companies, and may be applied in courses in Administration, International Management and Human Resources Management. The agribusiness at hand has Luis as protagonist, which allowed the theme to be approached taking into account the lack of a common language between the foreign managers and the Brazilian unit in this analysis, many things have changed in the company, among them internationalization and the inefficiency of the distance management, questions linked to the cultural differences between the individuals that make up the unit in Brazil and its international shareholders.
ABNT Citation:
CHAGAS, J.; SILVEIRA-MARTINS, E.; RAASCH, M. More Distant than Shoddy Rice: A Case of Psychological Distance for Teaching. Revista Eletrônica Científica do CRA-PR, v. 6, n. 2, p. 89-104, 2019.
APA Citation:
Chagas, J., Silveira-martins, E., & Raasch, M. (2019). More Distant than Shoddy Rice: A Case of Psychological Distance for Teaching. Revista Eletrônica Científica do CRA-PR, 6(2), 89-104.
Permalink:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/58495/more-distant-than-shoddy-rice--a-case-of-psychological-distance-for-teaching/i/en
Document type:
Caso de Ensino
Language:
Inglês
References:
Bloemer, J., Pluymaekers, M., & Odekerken, A. (2013). Trust and Affective Commitment as Energizing Forces for Export Performance. International Business Review, 22, 363–380. doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.05.002

Cancino, C. A. (2014). Rapid Internationalization of SMEs: Evidencie from Born Global Firms in Chile. Revista Inovar, 24, 141 – 151.

Cândido, R. J. G. J. (2009). O relacionamento entre a distância psicológica individual e os valores individuais. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra -FEUC, Portugal.

Celano, A., Fontoura, Y., & Maciel, E. (2016). Distância psicológica em internacionalização de empresas: reflexões sob o ponto de vista do estrangeiro. Pretexto, 17(2), 81-97. doi.org/10.21714/pretexto.v17i2.2855

Evans, J., Treadgold, A., & Mavondo, F. T. (2000). Psychic Distance and the Performance of International Retailers a suggested theorical framework. International Marketing Review, 17(4), 373-391. doi.org/10.1108/02651330010339905

Fernandes, S. S. M. F. (2013). O Impacto da Distância Psicológica no Processo de Internacionalização das PME Portuguesas. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal FEUC, Portugal.

Gervasoni, V. C., Kubo, E. K. M, & Farina, M. C. (2014). Distância psíquica no processo de internacionalização: a percepção dos expatriados brasileiros. Internext, 9(3), 57-77.

Rocha, A. (2004). O construto da distância psicológica: componentes, mediadores e assimetria. In: Hemais, C. A. O desafio dos mercados externos: teoria e prática na internacionalização da firma. Rio de Janeiro: MAUAD, 92-107.

Silva, M. G. F., Rocha, A., & Figueiredo, O. (2007). Medindo o construto da distância psíquica. Economia e Gestão, 7(14), 85-106.

Sousa, C. M. P., & Bradley, F. (2006). Cultural distance and psychic distance: two peas in a pod? Journal of International Marketing, 14(1), 49-70. doi.org/10.1509/jimk.14.1.49

Stöttinger, B., & Schlegelmilch, B.B. (1998). Explaining export development through psychic distance: enlightening or elusive? International Marketing Review, 15(5), 357-372. doi.org/10.1108/02651339810236353