Organizing Prisons through Public-Private Partnerships: a Cross-Country Investigation Outros Idiomas

ID:
9098
Resumo:
In this paper, we analyze the private participation in prison services in three countries: Brazil, France, and the United States. We highlight striking differences in efficiency between these countries and argue that the explanation for these differences is not restricted to the way property rights are distributed (i.e. public vs. private management). Instead, our analysis suggests that understanding those differences also requires an analysis of the incentives provided by contractual choices as well as decision and revenue rights distribution and institutional constraints. The theoretical literature usually analyzes these blocks separately, and often focuses on property rights distribution. We argue that an efficient arrangement is the result of the way these elements are combined, giving rise to a distinctive governance structure.
Citação ABNT:
CABRAL, S.; SAUSSIER, S. Organizing Prisons through Public-Private Partnerships: a Cross-Country Investigation. Brazilian Administration Review, v. 10, n. 1, p. 100-120, 2013.
Citação APA:
Cabral, S., & Saussier, S. (2013). Organizing Prisons through Public-Private Partnerships: a Cross-Country Investigation. Brazilian Administration Review, 10(1), 100-120.
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/9098/organizing-prisons-through-public-private-partnerships--a-cross-country-investigation/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
Albreht, T., & Klazinga, N. (2009). Privatisation of health care in Slovenia in the period 1992–2008. Health Policy, 90(2), 262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.007

Archambeault, W. G., & Deis, D. R., Jr. (1996). Cost-effective comparisons of private versus public prisons in Louisiana: a comprehensive analysis of allen, avoyelles ad winn correctional centers. Baton Rouge, La: Louisiana State University.

Artières, P., Lascoumes, P., & Salle, G. (2004). ‘Introduction’. In P. Artières & P. Lascoumes (Eds.), Gouverner, enfermer: la prison, un modèle indépassable? (pp. 23-54). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Athias, L., & Saussier, S. (2007). Un partenariat public privé rigide ou flexible? Théorie et application aux concessions routières à péage. Revue Économique, 58(3), 565-576.

Ayres, R. L. (1998). Crime and violence as development issues in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Bajari, P., & Tadelis, S. (2001). Incentives versus transaction costs : a theory of procurement contracts. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387-407.

Baker, G. P., Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J. (2008). Strategic alliances: bridges between islands of conscious power. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(2), 146-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2008.03.001

Bayer, P., & Pozen, D. (2005). The effectiveness of juvenile correctional facilities: public versus private management. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 549-589. doi: 10.1086/497526

Beck, A. R. (2001). Recidivism: a fruit salad concept in the criminal justice world. Kansas City, MO: Justice Concepts, Inc.

Bennet, J., & Iossa, E. (2010). Contracting out public service provision to not-for-profit firms. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(4), 784-802. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpp040

Bennett, J., & Iossa, E. (2006). Delegation of contracting in the private provision of public services. Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 75-92. doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-9110-z

Blustein, J. F., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). The interrelationship between public and private prisons: does the existence of prisoners under private management affect the rate of growth in expenditures on prisoners under public management? [Mimeo]. ACSME, Lousiana, USA.

Boin, A., James, O., & Lodge, M. (2006). The new public management revolution in the public sector: promises and outcomes in three European prison systems. Public Policy and Administration, 21(2), 81-100. doi: 10.1177/095207670602100207

Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Public service performance: perspectives on measurement and management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cabral, S., & Azevedo, P. F. (2008). The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective. Brazilian Administration Review, 5(1), 53-69. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/bar/v5n1/v5n1a05.pdf. doi: 10.1590/S1807-76922008000100005

Cabral, S., Lazzarini, S. G., & Azevedo, P. F. (2010). Private operation with public supervision: evidence of hybrid modes of governance in prisons. Public Choice, 145(1-2), 281-293. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9566-0

Cabral, S., Lazzarini, S. G., & Azevedo, P. F. (in press). Private entrepreneurs in public services: a longitudinal examination of outsourcing and statization of prisons . Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. (Prevision Screen – 2013).

Camp, S., & Daggett, D. (2005). Quality of operations at private and public prisons: using trends in inmate misconduct to compare prisons. Justice Research and Policy, 7(1), 27-52. doi: 10.3818/JRP.7.1.2005.27

Camp, S., & Gaes, G. G. (2002). Growth and quality of U.S. private prisons: evidence from a national survey. Criminology and Public Policy, 1(3), 427-450. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00102.x

Chantraine, G. (2004). Les temps des prisons, Inertie, réformes et reproduction d´un dispositif institutionnel. In P. Artières & P. Lascoumes (Eds.), Gouverner, enfermer: la prison, un modèle indépassable? (pp. 57-82). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Chong, E., Huet, F., Saussier, S., & Steiner, F. (2006). Public-private partnerships and prices: evidence from water distribution in France. Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 149-169. doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-9106-8

Cour des Comptes. (2006). Garde et réinsertion-La gestion des prisons [Rapport public thématique]. France, Auteur.

Cour des Comptes. (2010). Rapport public thématique: le service public pénitentiaire [Rapport public thématique]. France, Auteur.

Cronqvist, H., & Thaler, R. H. (2004). Design choices in privatized social security-systems: learning from the Swedish experience. American Economic Review, 94(2), 424-428. doi: 10.1257/0002828041301632

Departamento de Execução Penal do Estado do Paraná. (n.d.). (registros internos). Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

Departamento Penitenciário Nacional. (2008). Sistema de informação penitenciária: INFOPEN (Dados consolidados). Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça.

Departamento Penitenciário Nacional. (2009). Relatório de gestão DEPEN: Exercício 2008. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça.

Desrieux, C. (2006). Le rôle de l’autorité publique dans la gestion déléguée des services publics locaux: une approche par la théorie des contrats incomplets . Revue Économique, 57(3), 529-540.

Dilulio, J. J., Jr. (1996). Help wanted: economists, crimes and public policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 3-24. doi: 10.2307/2138281

Estache, A. (2006). PPI partnerships vs. PPI divorces in LDCs . Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 3-26. doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-9107-7

Glachant, J. M., & Finon, D. (2003). Competition in European electricity markets: a cross-country comparison. Chatelham: Edward Elgar.

Grant, R. M. (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 491-517. doi: 10.1002/smj.314

Guasch, J. L., Laffont, J. J., & Straub, S. (2008). Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(2), 421-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.05.003

Guppy, P. (2003). Private prisons and the public interest: improving quality and reducing cost through competition. Seattle, WA: Washington Policy Center

Hart, O. (2003). Incomplete contracts and public ownership: remarks and application to public private-partnerships. The Economic Journal, 113(486), C69-C76. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00119

Hart, O., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1127-1161. doi: 10.1162/003355300555448

Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public-private partnerships: an international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545-558. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x

Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design [Special Issue]. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7, 24-52.

Human Rights Watch. (1998). O Brasil atrás das grades. Retreived from http://www.hrw.org/portuguese/reports/presos/prefacio.htm

Laffont, J. J. (2000). Etapes vers un état moderne: une analyse économique. In C. Carl, Etat et gestion publique: actes du colloque du 16 decembre 1999 (pp. 117-50). France, Paris: Conseil d'Analyse Économique.

Lazerges, C. (1997). Les établissements penitentiaires a gestion mixte: à l’eprouve de l’observation. In P. Lafarge (Ed.), Établissements penitentiaires a gestion mixte: actes du colloque de montpellier (pp. 32-49). Paris: Pedone.

Levin, J., & Tadelis, S. (2010). Contracting for government services: theory and evidence from U.S. cities. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(3), 507-541. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x

Levy, B., & Spiller, P. (1994). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: a comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 10(2), 201-246.

Logan, C. (1990). Private prisons: cons and pros. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lukemeyer, A., & Mccorkle, A. (2006). Privatization of prisons: impact on prisons conditions. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 189-206. doi: 10.1177/0275074005281352

Makadok, R., & Coff, R. (2009). Both market and hierarchy: an incentive-systems theory of hybrid governance forms. The Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 297-319. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2009.36982628

Malhotra, N. (2007). Marketing research: an applied orientation (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ménard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160(3), 345-376. doi: 10.1628/0932456041960605

Mitchell, M. (2003). The pros of privately-housed cons: new evidence on the cost savings of private prisons. Albuquerque, NM: Rio Grande Foundation.

Morris, J. C. (2007). Government and market pathologies of privatization: the case of prison privatization. Politics and Policy, 35(2), 318-341. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00062.x

Myers, M. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. London: Sage.

Oppel, R. A., Jr. (2011 May 18). Private prisons found to offer little in savings. The New York Times, Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/19/us/19prisons.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha2

Perrone, D., & Pratt, T. (2003). Comparing the quality of confinement and cost effectiveness of public versus private prisons: what we know, why we do not know more, and where to go from here. The Prison Journal, 83(3), 301-322. doi: 10.1177/0032885503256329

Price, B., & Riccucci, N. (2005). Exploring the determinants of decisions to privatize state prisons. American Review of Public Administration, 35(3), 223-235. doi: 10.1177/0275074005277174

Roberts, J. (2010). Designing incentives in organizations. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(1), 125-132. doi: 10.1017/S1744137409990221

Sabol, W. J., West, H. C., & Cooper, M. (2009). Prisoners in 2008 (Bulletin NCJ 228417), Washington, DC, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Salle, G. (2009). État de droit, État gestionnaire. Champ Penal/Penal Field, 3. Retrieved from http://champpenal.revues.org/601. doi: 10.4000/champpenal.601

Schneider, A. L. (1999). Public-private partnerships in the U.S. prison system. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 192-208. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955119

Shirley, M., & Ménard, C. (2002). Cities awash: a synthesis of the country cases. In M. Shirley (Ed.), Thirsting for efficiency: the economics and politics of urban water system reform (pp. 1-42). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Stake, R. E. (2005). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Thibault, P. M. (1995). Le defi des prisons privees. Paris: Albin Michel.

Wacquant, L. (2001). As prisões da miséria. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.