Valoração do conhecimento: significação e identidade na ação organizacional Outros Idiomas

ID:
9595
Resumo:
A valoração do conhecimento representa uma lacuna na área do conhecimento organizacional. Esse artigo visa responder quais processos são adotados pelos indivíduos para a valoração dos conhecimentos nas organizações. A pesquisa, realizada com profissionais de RH, utilizou grounded theory method. Os resultados sugerem que o processo de identificação dos indivíduos com a identidade organizacional ocupa um lugar central na valoração do conhecimento. A organização, por intermédio da alta gestão ou das rotinas organizacionais, surgiu como “o outro” que parece conduzir as diretrizes a serem seguidas, assim como quais conhecimentos avaliar e valorar; aquela com quem os membros organizacionais buscam identificar-se. Os indivíduos expressaram mecanismos de afirmação, adequação ou reconstrução de suas identidades a fim de gerar, justificar ou negar identificação com a organização. É sugerido que o modelo de comando vertical ainda prevalece sobre a interação horizontal, tornando difícil o estabelecimento de conhecimento emergente entre os membros organizacionais.
Citação ABNT:
CHERMAN, A.; PINTO, S. R. R. Valoração do conhecimento: significação e identidade na ação organizacional. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 53, n. 2, p. 142-155, 2013.
Citação APA:
Cherman, A., & Pinto, S. R. R. (2013). Valoração do conhecimento: significação e identidade na ação organizacional. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(2), 142-155.
Link Permanente:
http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/9595/valoracao-do-conhecimento--significacao-e-identidade-na-acao-organizacional/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
ANTONACOPOULOU, E. P. The relationship between individual and organizational learning: new evidence from managerial learning practices. Management Learning, v. 37, n. 4, p. 455-473, 2006.

ASHFORTH, B. E; HARRISON, S. H; CORLEY, K. G. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 325-374, 2008.

BARNEY, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99-120, 1991.

BARTEL, C. A; GARUD, R. Narrative knowledge in action: adaptive abduction as a mechanism for knowledge creation and exchange in organizations. In: EASTERBY-SMITH, M; LYLES, M. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. p. 324-342.

BROWN, A. D; STARKEY, K. Organizational identity and learning: a psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 25, n. 1, p. 102-120, 2000.

BROWN, J. S; DUGUID, P. Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, v. 12, n. 2, p. 198-213, 2001.

BRYANT, A; CHARMAZ, K The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2007.

BURREL, G; MORGAN, G. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Vermont: Ashgate, 2003.

CHARMAZ, K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2006.

CONTU, A; WILLMOTT, H. Re-embedding situatedness: the importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, v. 14, n. 3, p. 283-296, 2003.

COOK, S. D. N; BROWN, J. S. Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, v. 10, n. 4, p. 381-400, 1999.

COOK, S. D. N; YANOW, D. Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 2, n. 4, p. 373-390, 1993.

CORLEY, K. G; GIOIA, D. A. Semantic learning as change enabler: Relating organizational identity and organizational learning. In: EASTERBY-SMITH, M; LYLES, M. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. p. 621-636.

CORLEY, K. G; HARQUAIL, C. V; PRATT, R; GLYNN, M. A; FIOL, C. M; HATCH, M. J. Guiding organizational identity trough aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 15, n. 2, p. 85-99, 2006.

DEWEY, J. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1938.

DEWEY, J. The essential Dewey: Pragmatism, education, democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.

DUTTON, J. E; DUKERICH, J. M; HARQUAIL, C. V. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 39, n. 2, p. 239-263, 1994.

ELKJAER, B. Social learning theory: learning as participation in social processes. In: EASTERBY-SMITH, M; LYLES, M. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. p. 38-53.

GAO, Y; RILEY, M. Knowledge and identity. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 12, n. 3, p. 317-334, 2010.

GHERARDI, S. Organizational knowledge: the texture of workplace learning. Malden: Blackwell, 2006.

GLASER, B. G; STRAUSS, A. L. The discovery of grounded theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction, 2006.

GRANT, R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, winter, p. 109-122, 1996.

HANDLEY, K; CLARK, T; FINCHAM, R; STURDY, A. Researching situated learning: participation, identity and practices in client–consultant relationships. Management Learning, v. 38, n. 2, p. 173-191, 2007.

HARMAN, K. Everyday learning in a public sector workplace: the embodiment of managerial discourses. Management Learning, v. 43, n. 3, p. 275-289, 2012.

HARQUAIL, C; KING, T. Organizational identity and embodied cognition. Proceedings of The Academy of Management Congress, The Academy of Management, Seattle, August, 2003.

HEDBERG, B; WOLFF, R. Organizing, learning, and strategizing. In: DIERKES, M: NONAKA, I. Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. p. 535-556.

KANE, A. A. Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organization Science, v. 21, n. 3, p. 643-660, 2010.

LAVE, J; WENGER, E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1991.

MENON, T; BLOUNT, S. The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation. Research in Organizational Behavior, v.25, n., p.137–186, 2003.

MILLER, C. D; SALKIND, J. N. Qualitative data analysis software. In: MILLER, C. D; SALKIND, J. N. Handbook of research design & social measurement. 6th ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002. p. 165-179.

NAG, R; CORLEY, K. G; GIOIA, D. A. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, v. 50, n. 4, p. 821-847, 2007.

NONAKA, I; TOYAMA, R; BYOSIÈRE, P. A theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In: KIERLES, M; NONAKA, I. Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. p. 491-517.

OBORN, E; DAWSON, S. Learning across communities of practice: an examination of multidisciplinary work. British Journal of Management, v. 21, n. 4, p. 843-858, 2010.

PEIRCE, C. S. The Essential Peirce, Volume 2: Selected Philosophical Writings, 1893-1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.

PENROSE, E. Teoria do crescimento da firma. São Paulo: Unicamp, 2006, original 1959.

PRAHALAD, C. K; HAMEL, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, v. 68, n. 3, p. 79-91, 1990.

RAVISHANKAR, M. N; PAN, S. L. The influence of organizational identification on organizational knowledge management. Management Science, v. 36, n. 2, p. 221-234, 2008.

ROBERTSON, M; SCARBROUGH, H; SWAN, J. Knowledge creation in professional service firms: institutional effects. Organization Studies, v. 24, n. 6, p. 831-857, 2003.

SCHWAR, G. M. Z; WATSON, B. M. The influence of perceptions of social identity on information technology-enabled change. Group & Organization Management, v. 30, n. 3, p. 289-318, 2005.

SPENDER, J. C; GRANT, R. M. Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, p. 5-9, 1996.

STARBUCK, W. H; BARNETT, M. L; BAUMARD, P. Payoffs and pitfalls of strategic learning. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, v. 66, n. 1, p. 7-21, 2008.

STARBUCK, W. H; HEDBERG, B. How organizations learn from success and failure. In: DIERKES, M; NONAKA, I. Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. p. 327-349.

TAJFEL, H. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Oxford: Academic Press. 1978. 474 p.

TAJFEL, H.; TURNER, J. C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, v. 33, p. 47, 1979.

TURNER, J. C. Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In LAWLER, E. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research, vol. 2: 77-122. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1985.

TURNER, J. C. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. p. 15-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

WARING, J; CURRIE, G. Managing expert knowledge: organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession. Organization Studies, v. 30, n 7, p. 755-778, 2009.

WEICK, K. Sensenmaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.

WENGER, E. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organizations, v. 7, n. 2, p. 225-246, 2000.

WENGER, E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. 18th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2008, original 1998.

WERNERFELT, B. A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, v. 5, n. 3, p. 171-180, 1984.

WHETTEN, D. A; MACKEY, A. A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, v. 41, n. 1, p. 393-414, 2002.