ID: 280
Authors:
Ricardo Bresler, Telma Hoyler, Marcela Amaral, Henrique Heidtmann, Gesley Fernandes, Marc Grau.
Source:
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, v. 14, n. 55, p. 105-128, July-December, 2009. 24 page(s).
Keyword:
land reform , land reform settlement , local development , peasant school , school management
Document type: Article (Portuguese)
Show Abstract
The article aims to contribute to the understanding of the centrality that a school can have in a community. Describes the Peasant School Program, the management of the Municipal School of Basic Education (EMEF) Hermínio Pagotto and connects to the context of the Bela Vista do Chibarro Land Reform Settlement (Araraquara, SP). The information was collected through participant observation on two fi eldwork visits. The article relates the Peasant Program and the School history, describes the equipment and the School quotidian, considering the management throw the tensions that have place in that context. It also seeks to deepen the understanding of the place of the school as a space for dialogue and mediation. The EMEF occupies the centrality of the agro village, and is the focus of a continuing process of production, maintenance and recreation of that space. Any school is related to a number of interests and expectations, and the school is also defi ned by the way it deals with those. In this case and in this article, that understanding is proposed by approaching historical formation, struggles, alliances and confl icts that make the place where community and school are located, and which are both refl ective and agent. By recognizing the infl uence of Land Reform Settlement in the school routine is possible to fi nd inside School the differences between the settlers groups: each child brings from home a point of view and fi nds a place to dialogue among different. Does the community places the school in its centrality? Given its centrality, does the school invigorate the community? As far as the research and this article goes, the answer seems to be positive to both questions, toward a dynamic movement of mutual reinforcement.