ID: 58187
Authors:
Rafael Beghini Ruas, Paula Chies Schommer.
Source:
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, v. 25, n. 81, p. 1-21, May-August, 2020. 21 page(s).
Keyword:
agroecology , CEPAGRO , political incidence , resource mobilization , social movement
Document type: Article (Portuguese)
Show Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between political incidence and resource mobilization in agroecology. Its focus is the trajectory of the non-governmental organization Center for Studies and Promotion of Group Agriculture (CEPAGRO), particularly its relationships. The study explores two examples of its work, articulated with organizations, movements, and networks, on the subjects of organic waste management and diversification in areas cultivated with tobacco, from 2006 to 2018. The research has a descriptive and analytical approach and is based on data collected through semistructured interviews, documents and natural and non-systematic participant observation. Based on the Political Process Theory, the initial categories for analysis were political opportunities, repertoires of action and social networks, complemented during the research. Resource mobilization was considered as a process of organizational strengthening, supported on a social base with a technical, political and monetary character. Among the conclusions, there is the predominance of a collaborative approach in the organization-state relationship, on the subjects and the cause of agroecology. Political advocacy actions are carried out with grassroots groups, other organizations, and civil society. Although the State creates political opportunities, the political advocacy and social mobilization actions carried out by CEPAGRO influence them. The process of mobilizing resources, both monetary and nonmonetary, goes beyond mobilization for the organization itself and becomes mobilization for the cause being advocated.