ID: 18470
Authors:
Maria de Fátima Bruno de Faria, Eunice M.L. Soriano de Alencar.
Source:
RAUSP Management Journal, v. 31, n. 2, p. 50-61, April-June, 1996. 12 page(s).
Keyword:
barriers , climate of creativity , creativity , stimulants , work environment
Document type: Article (Portuguese)
Show Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate stimulants and barriers to creativity in the environment of organizations, with the aim to subsidize the future construction of an instrument that may identify environmental factors present in the daily routine of Brazilian organizations that may affect creativity. The sample consisted of 25 professionals from various organizations in the Federal District, of which 19 were female and 6 were male, 20 subjects had completed undergraduate courses and 5 had completed high school courses. All the subjects were interviewed about stimulants and obstacles usually present in the organizations and those specific to the environment where they act as professionals. The answers were analysed and grouped into 12 categories of stimulants to creativity and 13 categories of obstacles to creativity. Results revealed that the stimulants most often found in the organizations were organizational support, organizational structure, managers'support, workgroup support, freedom and autonomy, and salary and benefits. In the subjects' work environments, the stimulants that appeared most often were managers'support, challenges, participation, workgroup support, and organizational support. The obstacles generally present in the organizations were organizational structure, managers'characteristics, interpersonal relations, organizational culture, and communication. In the subjects' specific environments the most frequent obstacles were organizational structure, communication, organizational culture, political and administrative influences, interpersonal relations and amount of work. The subjects also presented suggestions on how to make the climate of their work environment favorable to creativity. The results confirm the data obtained by other researchers, although some differences have been noted between previous studies and the one described here.