Determining Factors for Delisting of Companies Listed on BM&FBOVESPA Other Languages

ID:
37065
Abstract:
Traditionally, the capital market has attracted the interest of scholars and researchers, motivated to understand the process of going public and trading securities of companies on a stock exchange. In this research context, an aspect had been neglected, something which indicates a gap in the body of knowledge about the capital market and corporate governance: delisting of companies. We aim to identify the determining factors for delisting companies from the Commodity & Futures Exchange BOVESPA (BM&FBOVESPA). Methodologically, this research has related a set of variables collected from secondary data available on the database of the Securities Commission of Brazil (CVM), BM&FBOVESPA, and Economatica. By analyzing 227 listing cancellations, between 2001 and 2012, the results indicate that delisting of companies from BM&FBOVESPA is determined by the following factors: (i) greater concentration of ownership and control; (ii) lower free float; (iii) lower liquidity of shares; (iv) greater availability of cash; and (v) larger size. The fact that the controlling shareholder is a public or private company determines significant differences in the decision to delist. While in the first case cash availability is the most important factor, in the second liquidity is the main determining factor for delisting. From the academic viewpoint, this research extends the studies on delisting, still incipient in the Brazilian capital market context. For the capital market, identifying the characteristics of companies prone to cancel listing may prevent investors concerned about inherent risks at the time of acquiring shares by the controlling group interested in delisting.
ABNT Citation:
BORTOLON, P. M.; SILVA JÚNIOR, A. Fatores Determinantes para o Fechamento do Capital de Companhias Listadas na BM&FBOVESPA. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 26, n. 68, p. 140-153, 2015.
APA Citation:
Bortolon, P. M., & Silva Júnior, A. (2015). Fatores Determinantes para o Fechamento do Capital de Companhias Listadas na BM&FBOVESPA. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 26(68), 140-153.
DOI:
10.1590/1808-057x201500910
Permalink:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/37065/determining-factors-for-delisting-of-companies-listed-on-bm-fbovespa-/i/en
Document type:
Artigo
Language:
Português
References:
Berle, A. A.; Means, G. C. (1984). A moderna sociedade anônima e a propriedade privada. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.

Blair, M. M. (1995). Ownership and control: rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: The Bookings Institutions.

Boot, A. W. A.; Gopalan, R.; Thakor, A. V. (2006, abril). The entrepreneur’s choice between private and public ownership. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 803-836.

Boot, A. W. A.; Gopalan, R.; Thakor, A. V. (2008). Market liquidity, investor participation, and managerial autonomy: why do firms go private? The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 2013-2059.

Bortolon, P. M. (2013). Por que as empresas brasileiras adotam estruturas piramidais de controle. Base: Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 10, 2-18.

Burghof, H. P.; Schilling, D. (2003). Going private als corporate governance transaktion. Betr Forsch Prax, BFuP, v. 5, p. 117-136.

DeAngelo, H.; DeAngelo, L.; Rice, E. M. (1984). Going private: minority freezeouts and stockholder wealth. Journal of Law and Economics, v. 27, 367-401.

De Carvalho, A. G. (2002). Desenvolvimento financeiro e crescimento econômico. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, 33(4), 694-715.

Eid Junior, W.; Horng, W. J. (2005). A saída: uma análise da delistagem na BOVESPA. Recuperado de http://www.williameid.com.br/pdf/deslistagem_bovespa.pdf.

Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: some theory and implications. The Economic Journal, 105(430), 678-689.

Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs and free cash flow, corporate finance and take-overs. American Economics Review, 76(2), 323-329.

Jensen, M.; Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Jordan, B. D.; Liu, M. H.; Wu, Q. (2014). Corporate payout policy in dual-class firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, v. 26, p. 1-19. Recuperado de 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.02.004.

Khan, H. U. R.; Vilanova, L.; Hassairi, S. A. (2011). Effects of private equity investment on the decisions of European companies to go private: an empirical study. International Journal of Management, 28(2), 493-508.

Lawrence, E. C. (1986). A comparative analysis of public firms going private. Review of Business and Economic Research, 21(2), 1-17.

Leal, R. P. C.; Silva, A. L. C.; Valadares, S. M. (2002). Estrutura de controle das companhias brasileiras de capital aberto. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 6(1), 7-18.

Marçal, R. (2006). Ebtida: qual o real valor dessa métrica. Relações com Investidores, v. 96, p. 6-10.

Masulis, R. W, Pham, P. K.; Zein, J. (2011). Family business groups around the world: financing advantages, control motivations, and organizational choices. Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3556-3600.

Michelsen, M.; Klein, C. (2011). “Privacy please!”: the public to private decision in Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(1), 49-85.

Miller, D. A.; Frankenthaler, M. J. (2003). Securities registration: delisting/deregistration of securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Insights, 17(10), 7-12.

Moreira, L. F. (2000). A recompra de ações na BOVESPA. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.

Nóbrega, M.; Loyola, G.; Guedes Filho, E. M.; Pasqual, D. (2000). O mercado de capitais: sua importância para o desenvolvimento e os entraves com que se defronta o Brasil (Estudos para o Desenvolvimento do Mercado de Capitais da BOVESPA). São Paulo: BMF&Bovespa.

Olper, T.; Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leverage buyout activity: free cash flow vs financial distress costs. Journal of Finance, v. 48, p. 1985-1999.

Pagano, M.; Panetta, F.; Zingales, L. (1998, fevereiro). Why do companies go public?An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27-64.

Salotti, B. M.; Yamamoto, M. M. (2005). Um estudo empírico sobre o Ebitda como representação do fluxo de caixa operacional: estudo em empresas brasileiras. In Anais do 5º Congresso USP de Controladoria e Contabilidade, São Paulo, SP.

Sinnet, W. M. (2002). Why private companies stay private. Financial Executive International, 18(7), 51-53.

Souza, J. A. S.; Costa, W. B.; Almeida, J. E. F.; Bortolon, P. M. (2013). Determinantes e consequências do fechamento de capital nas práticas de gerenciamento de resultados. Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, 1(1), 38-57.

Tripodi, T.; Fellin, P.; Meyer, H. J. (1981). Análise da pesquisa social: diretrizes para o uso de pesquisa em serviço social e ciências sociais. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.

Weir, C.; Laing, D.; Wright, M. (2005). Undervaluation, private information, agency costs and the decision to go private. Applied Financial Economics, 15(13), 947-961.

World Federation of Exchanges. (2014). Statistics. Recuperado de http://www.world-exchanges.org/statistics.

Zillmer, P. (2002). Public to private-transaktionen in Deutschland: eine empirische analyse öffentlicher Übernahmeangebote. Finanzbetr, v. 4, p. 490-495.