Co-Authoring Scientific Papers in Management: International Academics’ Points Of View Other Languages

ID:
41175
Abstract:
Responding to institutional pressure to publish more papers, and in respected journals, management academics are seeking to increase their productivity by establishing co-authoring ties that speed up the process, from the initial stages of defining the research question to publication in a journal. Understanding the motives, benefits and hazards of co-authorship, especially using the experiences of highly reputed scholars, may help improve the efficiency and quality of research efforts. In this paper, we examine the responses to six questions sent to thirteen prolific international researchers, by email. In essence, we sought to understand such aspects as: the origins of co-authoring ties, the importance of having co-authors, the pitfalls of and methods for coordinating co-authorships, and what constitutes a contribution that warrants co-authorship. Results show that (1) international researchers evaluate their co-authorships positively, (2) many co-authorships emerge from prior supervision or personal proximity, more so than ties to the same institution, (3) the ordering of names is defined a priori and managed actively, (4) the benefits sought after are mainly specialization and complementary competences, (5) co-authorship is given based on actual contribution, albeit there are many forms of contribution, and (6) the pressure to publish, and an increasing difficulty of publishing in the top journals are the drivers of co-authorship. The analyses point to important insights for young Brazilian scholars.
ABNT Citation:
FERREIRA, M. A. S. P. V.; SERRA, F. R. A Coautoria em Artigos Científicos de Administração: Perspectivas de Pesquisadores Internacionais. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, v. 16, n. 4, p. 663-663, 2015.
APA Citation:
Ferreira, M. A. S. P. V., & Serra, F. R. (2015). A Coautoria em Artigos Científicos de Administração: Perspectivas de Pesquisadores Internacionais. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 16(4), 663-663.
DOI:
10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.381
Permalink:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/41175/co-authoring-scientific-papers-in-management--international-academics----points-of-view/i/en
Document type:
Artigo
Language:
Português
References:
ABBASI, A.; ALTMANN, J.; HOSSAIN, L. Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, v. 5, p. 594-607, 2011.

ABBASI, A.; CHUNG, K.; HOSSAIN, L. Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance. Information Processing and Management, v. 48, n.4, p. 671-679, 2012.

BAYER, A.; SMART, J. Career publication patterns and collaborative styles in American academic science. Journal of Higher Education, v. 62, p. 615-636, 1991.

BEAVER, D. Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 3, p. 399-408, 2004.

CRONIN, B. Collaboration in Art and in Science: Approaches to attribution, authorship, and acknowledgment. Information & Culture, v. 47, n. 1, p.18-37, 2012.

CRONIN, B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 52, n. 7, p. 558-569, 2002.

EINAV, L.; YARIV, L. What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 20, n. 1, p. 175-188, 2006.

ENGLEBRECHT, T.; HANKE, S.; KUANG, Y. An assessment of patterns of coauthorship for academic accountants within premier journals: Evidence from 1979–2004. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, v. 25, n. 2, p. 172-181, 2008.

FLOYD, S.; SCHROEDER, D.; FINN, D. Only if I’m first author: Conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, v. 37, n. 3, p. 734-747, 1994.

FRENKEN, K.; HOLZL, W.; VOR, F. The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988-2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 22, n. 1/2, p. 9-30, 2005.

GLÄNZEL, W.; SCHUBERT, A. Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, v. 50, n. 2, p. 199-214, 2001.

GORDON, M. A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication, Scientometrics, v. 2, n. 1, p. 193-201, 1980.

HARDWIG, J. Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 82, n. 7, p. 335-349, 1985.

HUDSON, J. Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 10, n. 3, p. 153-158, 1996.

LABAND, D.; TOLLISON, R. Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, v. 108, n. 3, p. 632-662, 2000.

LEE, S.; BOZEMAN, B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, v. 35, n. 5, p. 673-702, 2005.

LINER, G.; SEWELL, E. Research requirements for promotion and tenure at PhD granting departments of economics. Applied Economics Letters, v. 16, p. 765-768, 2009.

LUUKKONEN, T.; TIJSSEN, R.; PERSSON, O.; SIVERTSEN, G. The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, v. 28, n. 1, p. 15-36, 1993.

MACIEJOVSKY, B.; BUDESCU, D.; ARIELY, D. The researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits? Marketing Science, v. 28, n. 3, p. 589-598, 2009.

MANTON, E.; ENGLISH, D. The trend toward multiple authorship in business journals. Journal of Education for Business, v. 82, n. 3, p. 164-168, 2007.

MASKE, K.; DURDEN, G.; GAYNOR, P. Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and female economists. Economic Inquiry, v. 40, p. 539-555, 2003.

MODI, P.; HASSAN, A.; TENG, A.; CHITWOOD, W. How many cardiac surgeons does it take to write a research article? Seventy years of authorship proliferation and internationalization in the cardiothoracic surgical literature. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, v. 136, n. 1, p. 4-6, 2008.

NASCIMENTO, S.; BUEREN, I. Redes sociais na produção científica dos programas de pós-graduação de Ciências Contábeis do Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 15, n. 1, p. 47-66, 2011.

PHELAN, S.; FERREIRA, M.; SALVADOR, R. The first twenty years of the Strategic Management Journal. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 12, p. 1161-1168, 2002.

RUTLEDGE, R.; KARIM, K. Determinants of co-authorship for the most productive authors of accounting literature. Journal of Education for Business, v. 84, n. 3, p. 130-134, 2008.

SERRA, F.; FIATES, G.; FERREIRA, M. Publicar é difícil ou faltam competências? O desafio de pesquisar e publicar em revistas científicas na visão de editores e revisores internacionais. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 9, n. 4, p. 32-55, 2008.

SHRUM, W.; GENUTH, J.; CHOMPALOV, I. Structures of scientific collaboration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.

SLONE, R. Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved co-authorship. American Journal of Roentgenologv, v. 67, p. 571-579, 1996.

SONNENWALD, D. Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, v. 4, n. 1, p. 643-681, 2007.

STOKOLS, D.; HARVEY, R.; GRESS, J.; FUQUA, J.; PHILLIPS, K. In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, v. 28, n. 2, p. 202-213, 2005.

SWANSON, E. Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management, and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 21, n. 1, p. 223-255, 2004.

THAGARD, P. How scientists explain disease. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.

URBANCIC, F. The extent of collaboration in the production of accounting research. Accounting Educators Journal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 47-61, 1992.

VILAN FILHO, J.; SOUZA, H.; MUELLER, S. Artigos de periódicos científicos das áreas de informação no Brasil: Evolução da produção e da autoria múltipla. Perspectivas em Ciências da Informação, v. 13, n. 2, p. 2-17, 2008.

WRAY, K. Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, v. 37, n. 3, p. 505-514, 2006.

WRAY, K. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, v. 69, n. 1, p. 150-168, 2002.

YIN, L. C.; KRETSCHMER, H.; HANNEMAN, R.; LIU, Z-Y. Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the collnet network. Information Processing & Management, v. 42, n. 6, p. 1599-1613, 2006.