55099

Elsi do Rocio Cardoso Alano
Maria Tereza Saraiva de Souza
José Mauro da Costa Hernandez

Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa

The professor's behavior is still an emerging issue with few quantitative studies. The choices of technologies, methodologies and teaching practices of a professor affect both professors and learning of students, turning out to be an increasing interest in researches in many areas of education. The main objective of this research is to analyze how innovation theories can be applied to identify the determinants of professor’s behavior in the adoption of teaching technologies, methods and practices, seeking to identify new variables and constructs, for the development and expansion of theoretical models. This article begins with an explanation of base theories widespread in other areas of knowledge, Theory of Planned behavior (TPB), Theory of Diffusion of Innovation (IDT), the Technology of Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB), to understand the application in studies on professor’s behavior. There are some researches in various courses and levels of education to illustrate the application of these theories to identify the determinants of the use of technologies, methodologies and teaching practice by professors. These theories and models can be used to predict the adoption of new technologies as a platform for e-learning, teaching methods and practices such as active teaching methodologies and cross-cutting themes such as Sustainability.

Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior, Professor’s Behavior, Technology of Acceptance Model, Theory of Diffusion of Innovation, Theory of Planned Behavior

ALANO, E. R. C.; SOUZA, M. T. S.; HERNANDEZ, J. M. C. Teorias de Inovação na Educação Superior: Determinantes do Comportamento do Professor na Adoção de Tecnologias, Métodos e Práticas de Ensino . Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, v. 20, n. 3, p. 1-18, 2019.

Alano, E. R. C., Souza, M. T. S., & Hernandez, J. M. C. (2019). Teorias de Inovação na Educação Superior: Determinantes do Comportamento do Professor na Adoção de Tecnologias, Métodos e Práticas de Ensino . Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(3), 1-18.

10.13058/raep.2019.v20n3.1640

https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/55099/innovation-theories-in-higher-education--teacher-behavioral-determinants-in-the-adoption-of-technologies--methods-and-teaching-practices/i/en

Artigo

Português

ABDALA, E. C.; BARBIERI, J. C. Determinants of sustainable supply chain: an analysis of mensuration models of pressures and socio-environmental practices. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, v. 7, n. 2, p. 110-123, July/Dec. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/joscmv7n2p

AJJAN, H.; HARTSHORNE, R. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, Berlim: SpringerVerlag, v. 2, n. 11, p. 71-80, May 2008. DOI: 10.1016/i.iheduc.2008.05.002

AJZEN, I.; FISHBEIN, M. Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-9, jan. 1972.

AJZEN, I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: KUHL, J. E.; BECKMANN, J. (Org.). Action control: from cognition to behavior. Springer-Verlag, Berlim Heidelberger, 1985. Cap. 2, p. 11-39.

AWA, H. O.; OJIABO, O. U.; EMECHETA, B. C. Integrating TAM, TPB and TOE frameworks and expanding their characteristic constructs for e-commerce adoption by SMEs. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management. Flórida EUA, v. 6, n. 1, p.76-94, Nov., 2015.

BAKER, E. W.; AL-GAHTANI, S. S.; HUBONA, G. S. The effects of gender and age on new technology implementation in a developing country: testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Information Technology & People, Emerald Insight, v. 20, n. 4, p.352375, oct-dec., 2007. DOI: 10.1108/09593840710839798

BECKMANN, J. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. Cambridge, v. 50, n. 2, December, p.179-211, 1991. DOI: 10.1.1.317.9673&rep=rep1&type=pdf

CHENG, P. University lectures’ intention to teach an ethics course: a test of competing models. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 126, n. 2, p. 247-258, Nov. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1949-y

CHEN, M.; LU, T.‐Y. Modeling e‐coupon proneness as a mediator in the extended TPB model to predict consumers' usage intentions. Internet Research, Bradford-United Kingdom, v. 21, n. 5, p. 508-526, May 2011. DOI 10.1108/10662241111176344

DAVIS, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of computer technology. MIS Quarterly, Dordrecht-Netherlands v. 13, n. 3, p. 319-340, Sep 1989. DOI: 10.2307/249008

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031930 AJZEN, I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 52, n.1, p. 27–58, Feb. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/101146/annurey.psych.52.1.27

FISHBEIN, M.; AJZEN, I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

FIVES, H.; BUEHL, M. M. Exploring Differences in Practing Teachers’ Valuing of Pedagogical Knowledge Based on Teaching Ability Beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education: Michigan-EUA, v. 65, n. 5, p. 435448, Sep-Oct 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0022487114541813

HOLZBERGER, D.; PHILIPP, A.; KUNTER, M. How Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Is Related to Instructional Quality: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, American Psychological Association, v. 105, n. 3, p. 774-786, Aug 2013. DOI: 10.1037/a0032198

HUSSEIN, R. M. S.; MOURAD, M. The adoption of technological innovations in a B2B context: an empirical study on the higher education industry in Egypt. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Santa Bárbara-United Kingdom, v. 29, n.6, p. 525-545, Aug 2014.

JALIVAND, M. R.; SAMIEI, N. The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism destination choice: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Internet Research, Bradford-United Kingdom, v. 22, n. 5, p. 591-612, Oct 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211271563

JOLAEE, A.; NOR, K. Md; KHANI N.; YUSOFF, R. Md. Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. International Journal of Educational Management, Bradford-United Kingdom, v. 28, n. 4, p.413 – 431, Jun 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0041

KALU, I.; UWATT, L. E.; ASIM, A. E. Nigerian teachers’ attitude toward environmental sustainability issues in the curriculum. Journal Environmental Systems, v. 32, n. 3, p. 249259, Dec 2004.

LEE, J.; CERRETO, F. A.; LEE, J. Theory of planned behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, Canadá, v. 13, n. 1, p. 152–164, Jan 2010.

LEE, Y.C. An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, v. 30, n. 5, p. 517-541, Sept. 2006.

MOORE, G. C.; BENBASAT, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology information. Information Systems Research, v. 2, n. 3, p. 173-191, Sep 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192

PIPERE, A.; MICULE, I. Mathematical identity for a sustainable future: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, v. 16, n. 1, p. 5-31, 2014. DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2014-0001

ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. New York: 3 th ed., 1983.

SHUMAN, D. K.; HAM, S. H. Toward a theory of commitment to environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, v. 28, n. 2, p. 25-32, Jul 1997.

SINGH, G.; HARDAKER, G. Barriers and enablers to adoption and diffusion of eLearning: a systematic review of the literature – a need for an integrative approach. Education + Training, v. 56, n. 2/3, p. 105-121, Oct. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-20120123

SUGAR, W.; CRAWLEY, F.; FINE, B. Examining teachers' decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, Canada, v. 7, n. 4, p. 201-213, Oct 2004.

TAYLOR, S.; TODD, P. A. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information System Research, v 6, n. 2, p. 144-176, June 1995. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23011007.

THURLINGS, M.; EVERS, A.T.; VERMEULEN, M. Toward a model of /explaining /teachers’ innovative behavior: a literature review. Review of Educational Research, Berkeley-USA, v. 85, n. 3, p. 430-471, Sep 2015.

TILLMANNS, t. et al. Interplay of rhizome and education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, v. 16, n. 2, p. 5-17, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-2008

TONDEUR, J.; HERMANS, R.; VAN BRAAK, J.; VALCKE, M. Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computer is Human Behavior, v. 24, n. 6, p. 2541-2553, Sep 2008.

USHER, E. L.; PAJARES, F. Sources of self-efficacy in school: critical review of the literature and future directions. Emory University Review of Educational Research, United Kington, v. 78, n. 4, p. 751-796, Dec 2008.

YUSOP, F. D. A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 46, n.5, Sep. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12330