Modelos de avaliação baseados na contabilidade: limitações do modelo do lucro residual Outros Idiomas

ID:
6401
Resumo:
A pesquisa contábil na área do mercado de capitais recentemente voltou a investigar os modelos de avaliação de ações. Esta mudança tem ocorrida de forma paralela com a constatação empírica da existência de numerosas anomalias no comportamento do mercado e a capacidade das variáveis contábeis para explicar as diferenças nas rentabilidades obtidas pelos títulos no mercado. Esse contexto tem propiciado o desenho e desenvolvimento de estratégias de investimento que permitem obter rentabilidades abnormais positivas. Neste cenário, a análise dos dados contábeis tem demandada maior atenção, particularmente na determinação do valor de uma empresa (valor intrínseco) e, em segundo lugar, na explicação do comportamento do preço. A determinação do valor intrínseco necessariamente envolve o estabelecimento de um modelo de avaliação. Na última década, o Modelo do Lucro Residual (MLR) alcançou uma posição proeminente na literatura. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar os fundamentos conceituais do MLR. Após indicar suas vantagens em comparação com os modelos tradicionais de avaliação, descrevemos suas limitações, tanto do ponto de vista teórico como empírico. As características mais significativas analisadas são: a violação da "condição de lucro limpo", o efeito escala, e a estimação do valor final. As distintas circunstâncias inerentes à aplicação empírica do modelo tornam sua análise problemática, e fazem com que dificilmente possamos questionar sua validade, já que podem ser as diferentes proposições assumidas e necessárias para colocar o modelo em prática que estão equivocadas.
Citação ABNT:
FERNÁNDEZ, S. C.Modelos de valoración basados en magnitudes contables: limitaciones del modelo de resultado residual. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 21, n. 53, art. 6, p. 1-20, 2010.
Citação APA:
Fernández, S. C.(2010). Modelos de valoración basados en magnitudes contables: limitaciones del modelo de resultado residual. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 21(53), 1-20.
Link Permanente:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/6401/modelos-de-avaliacao-baseados-na-contabilidade--limitacoes-do-modelo-do-lucro-residual/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Espanhol
Referências:
BARTH, M.; CLINCH, G. Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Forthcoming, 2009.

BEAVER, W. Comments on: an empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 26, p. 35-42, 1999.

BERNARD, V. The Feltham-Ohlson framework: implications for empiricists. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 11, p. 733-747, 1995.

BROWN, S. et al. Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 28, p. 83-115, 1999.

CLAUS, J.; Thomas, J. Equity premium as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts´ earning forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. The Journal of Finance, v. LVI, p. 1629-1666, 2001.

COPELAND, T.; KOLLER, T.; MURRIN, J. Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.

COURTEAU, L.; KAO, J.; RICHARDSON, G. The equivalence of dividend, cash flows and residual earnings approaches to equity valuation employing ideal terminal value expressions. Working Paper, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, University of Alberta and University of Toronto, 2000.

DECHOW, P.; HUTTON, A.; SLOAN, R. The relation between analysts' forecasts of longterm earnings growth and stock price performance following equity offering. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 17, p. 1-32, 2000.

DHALIWAL, D.; SUBRAMANYAM, K.; TREZEVANT, R. Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 26, p. 43-67, 1999.

EASTON, P. et al. Using forecasts of earnings to simultaneously estimate growth and the rate of return on equity investment. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 40, p. 657-676, 2002.

EASTON, P.; Sommers, G. Scale and scale effects in market-based accounting research. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, p. 25-56, January, 2003.

EDWARDS, E.; BELL, P. The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1961.

FAIRFIELD, P. P/E, P/B and the present value of future dividends. Financial Analysts Journal, Jul./Ago., p. 23-31, 1994.

FELTHAM, G.; OHLSON, J. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 11, p. 689-731, 1995.

FRANCIS, J.; OLSSON, P.; OSWALD, D. Comparing the accuracy and explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 38, p. 45-70, 2000.

FRANCIS, J.; OLSSON, P.; OSWALD, D.Using mechanical earnings and residual income forecasts in equity valuation. Working Paper, Duke Univ., Univ. of Wisconsin and London Business School, 2001.

FRANKEL, R.; LEE, C. Accounting diversity and international valuation. Working Paper, University of Michigan and Cornell University, 2000.

FRANKEL, R.; LEE, C. Accounting valuation, market expectation and cross-sectional stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 25, p. 283-319, 1998.

GEBHARDT, W.; LEE, C.; SWAMINATHAN, B. Toward an implied cost-of-capital. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 39, p. 135-177, 2001.

HACKEL, K.; Livnat, J. Cash flow and security analysis. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin, 1992.

HOLTHAUSEN, R.; WATTS, R. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 3-75, 2001.

KOTHARI, S. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 105-231, 2001.

LEE, C.; MYERS, J.; SWAMINATHAN, B. What is the intrinsic value of the Dow?. The Journal of Finance, v. LIV, p. 1693-1741, 1999.

LEV, B. On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 27, p. 153-192, 1989.

LO, K.; LYS, T. The Ohlson model: contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, v. 15, p. 337-367, 2000.

LUNDHOLM, R.; O'KEEFE, T. On comparing residual income and discounted cash flow model of equity valuation: a response to Penman (2001). Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 18, p. 693696, 2001b.

LUNDHOLM, R.; O'KEEFE, T. Reconciling value estimates from the discounted cash flow model and the residual income model. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 18, p.311-335, 2001a.

MILLER, M.; MODIGLIANI, F. Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, v. 34, p. 411-433, 1961.

OHLSON, J. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 11, p. 661-687, 1995.

OHLSON, J.; ZHANG, X. On the theory of forecast horizon in equity valuation. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 37, p.437-449, 1999.

PALEPU, K.; Bernard, V.; HEALY, P. Business analysis and valuation. Using Financial Statements. South-Western College Publishing, 1996.

PEASNELL, K. Some formal connections between economic values and yields and accounting numbers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, v. 9, p. 361-381, 1982.

PENMAN, S. An evaluation of accounting rate-of return. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Spring, p. 233-255, 1991.

PENMAN, S. A synthesis of equity valuation techniques and the terminal value calculation for the dividend discount model. Review of Accounting Studies, v. 2, p.303-323, 1997.

PENMAN, S. On comparing cash flow and accrual accounting model for use in equity valuation: a response to Lundholm and O´Keefe. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 18, p.681-692, 2001.

PENMAN, S. Return to fundamental. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, v. 7, p. 465-484, 1992.

PENMAN, S.; SOUGIANNIS, T. A comparison of dividend, cash flow, and earnings approaches to equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 15, p. 343-383, 1998.

PENMAN, S. The articulation of price-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratios and the evaluation of growth. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 34, p. 235-259, 1996.

PREINREICH, G. Annual survey of economic theory: the theory of depreciation. Econometrica, v. 6, p. 219-223, 1938.

RAPPAPORT, A. Creating shareholder value. Free Press, 1986.

WILLIAMS, J. The theory of investment value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.

ZHANG, X. Conservative accounting and equity valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 29, p. 125-149, 2000.