78464

Leonardo Cardoso
João Vinícius de França Carvalho
Alexandre Teixeira Damasceno

Revista Contabilidade & Finanças

This article compares the efficient investment frontiers in light of the new standard of allocative thresholds allowed for assets guaranteeing provisions established by Resolutions of the National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional [CMN]) Nos. 4661/2018 and 4994/2022, verifying the probability of achieving returns that cover actuarial liabilities requiring a guarantee of minimum performance. This study innovates by assessing regulatory impacts on efficient Pension Fund (Entidades Fechadas de Previdência Complementar [EFPCs]) frontiers, comparing the results of risks and viable returns obtained by the new standards, using Conditional Value-at-Risk as a coherent risk measurement, as it meets the axiom of subadditivity. Furthermore, we provide measurements of the probability of achieving specific actuarial targets and of the portfolio generating a negative result. The national supplementary pension system recently went through a crisis, related to fraud and corruption schemes in the State-owned EFPCs triggered in 2016 through Operation Greenfield. As the main response to the current context, brought by the new normative acts, risk management processes were adopted and implemented and more refined Corporate Governance mechanisms were defined in the decision-making processes related to the investment policies adopted by an EFPC. Including the flexibilization of allocative thresholds. An impact of this research is to provide theoretical support for the pension sector, in light of macroeconomic contexts possibly marked by lower interest rates, in addition to assessing the practical implications of changes proposed in the new normative resolutions. Especially because EFPCs have systemically relevant actuarial liabilities. The methodology involved conditional optimization of portfolios using Asset-Only Assets and Liabilities Management (ALM) models. Despite the flexibility of new standards, there are no differences in the returns potentially obtained, given the overlapping of efficient frontiers of models in each standard. It was found that the unrestricted model showed higher returns with substantially lower volatility when compared to restricted models, pointing out that portfolios with fewer legal constraints can generate less exposure to EFPC net worth, something extremely important for defined benefit plans.

asset management, Assets and Liabilities Management, defined benefit plans, Pension Funds

CARDOSO, L.; CARVALHO, J. V. F.; DAMASCENO, A. T. Impactos regulatórios nos investimentos de Entidades Fechadas de Previdência Complementar no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 35, n. 96, p. 0-0, 2024.

Cardoso, L., Carvalho, J. V. F., & Damasceno, A. T. (2024). Impactos regulatórios nos investimentos de Entidades Fechadas de Previdência Complementar no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 35(96), 0-0.

https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/78464/regulatory-impacts-on-investments-by-pension-funds-in-brazil/i/en

Artigo

Português

Andongwisye, J., Torbjörn, L., Singull, M., & Mushi, A. (2018). Asset liability management for Tanzania pension funds by stochastic programming. Afrika Statistika, 13(3), 1733-1758. https://doi.org/10.16929/as/1733.131

Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068

Azambuja, S., & Campani, C. H. (2022). MAC: A proposal for consistent actuarial interest rates in pension funds. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(3), e-200390. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022200390.en

Bernardo, M. R., & Campani, C. H. (2019). Liability driven investment with alternative assets: Evidence from Brazil. Emerging Markets Review, 41, 100653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2019.100653

Bhat, D. A. (2020). A review of asset liability management models. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ub69x

Cariño, D. R., Kent, T., Myers, D. H., Stacy, C., Sylvanus, M., Turner, A. L., Watanabe, K., & Ziemba, W. T. (1994). The Russell-Yasuda Kasai model: An asset/liability model for a Japanese insurance company using multistage stochastic programming. Interfaces, 24(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.1.29

Daltro, A. B. V., & Leal, R. P. C. (2019). Fixed income and passive asset allocation outperformance in Brazil. The Journal of Wealth Management, 22(2), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2019.1.071

Damasceno, A. T., & Carvalho, J. V. F. (2021). Assessment of the new investment limits for assets of Social Security Regimes for Public Servants established by Resolution CMN 3,922/2010. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 23(4), 728-743. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v23i4.4128

Dempster, M. A. H., Germano, M., Medova, E. A., & Villaverde, M. (2003). Global asset liability management. British Actuarial Journal, 9(1), 137-195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321700004153

Di Domenica, N., Mitra, G., Valente, P., & Birbilis, G. (2007). Stochastic programming and scenario generation within a simulation framework: An information systems perspective. Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2197-2218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.06.013

Dong, Y., & Zheng, H. (2019). Optimal investment of DC pension plan under short-selling constraints and portfolio insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 85, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.12.005

Duarte, T. B., Valladão, D. M., & Veiga, Á. (2017). Asset liability management for open pension schemes using multistage stochastic programming under Solvency-II-based regulatory constraints. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 77, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.09.022

Duijm, P., & Bisschop, S. S. (2018). Short-termism of long-term investors? The investment behaviour of Dutch insurance companies and pension funds. Applied Economics, 50(31), 3376-3387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1420898

Ferstl, R., & Weissensteiner, A. (2011). Asset-liability management under time-varying investment opportunities. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(1), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.028

Flores, F. A., Campani, C. H., & Roquete, R. M. (2021). The impact of alternative assets on the performance of Brazilian private pension funds. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32(86), 314-330. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202111870

Gutierrez, T., Pagnoncelli, B., Valladão, D., & Cifuentes, A. (2019). Can asset allocation limits determine portfolio risk-return profiles in DC pension schemes? Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 86, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.02.009

Hernandez, J. A., Kang, S. H., & Yoon, S. (2021). Nonlinear spillover and portfolio allocation characteristics of energy equity sectors: Evidence from the United States and Canada. Review of International Economics, 30, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12553

Hosseinzadeh, M. M., & Consigli, G. (2017, May). Optimal Asset-Liability Management for Defined Benefit Pension Fund Under Stochastic Correlation (Ph.D. Thesis). Universita Degli Studi di Bergamo. https://aisberg.unibg.it/retrieve/e40f7b86-49d8-afca-e053-6605fe0aeaf2/Thesis-final.pdf

Josa-Fombellida, R., & Rincón-Zapatero, J. P. (2012). Stochastic pension funding when the benefit and the risky asset follow jump diffusion processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.033

Krokhmal, P., Uryasev, T., & Palmquist, J. (2001). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4(2), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2002.057

Leal, R. P. C., & Mendes, B. V. M. (2010). The risk-return relationship of pension funds with investments in hedge funds. Latin American Business Review, 11(2), 141-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2010.496307

Leibowitz, M. L., Fabozzi, F. J., & Sharpe, W. F. (1992). Investing: The collected works of Martin L. Leibowitz. Probus Professional Pub.

Lei Complementar n. 108, de 29 de maio de 2001. (2001). Dispõe sobre a relação entre a União, os Estados, o Distrito Federal e os Municípios, suas autarquias, fundações, sociedades de economia mista e outras entidades públicas e suas respectivas entidades fechadas de previdência complementar, e dá outras providências. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp108.htm#:~:text=Lcp108&text=Disp%C3%B5e%20sobre%20a%20rela%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20entre,complementar%2C%20e%20d%C3%A1%20outras%20provid%C3%AAncias.&text=Art.

Lei Complementar n. 109, de 29 de maio de 2001. (2001). Dispõe sobre o Regime de Previdência Complementar e dá outras providências. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp109.htm#:~:text=LEI%20COMPLEMENTAR%20N%C2%BA%20109%2C%20DE%2029%20DE%20MAIO%20DE%202001&text=Disp%C3%B5e%20sobre%20o%20Regime%20de%20Previd%C3%AAncia%20Complementar%20e%20d%C3%A1%20outras%20provid%C3%AAncias

Li, Y., & Forsyth, P. A. (2019). A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 86, 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.03.001

Magnani, M., Sanfelici, D., & Muniz Filho, G. A. (2021). Investimentos dos fundos de pensão brasileiros no mercado imobiliário comercial: Uma Análise do portfólio imobiliário e seu padrão territorial. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, 23, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202114

Menoncin, F., & Vigna, E. (2017). Mean-variance target-based optimisation for defined contribution pension schemes in a stochastic framework. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 76, 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.08.002

Minardi, A. M. A. F., Bortoluzzo, A., & Moreira, L. A. (2017). Private equity and venture capital growth and performance in emerging markets. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894543

Oliveira, A. D., Filomena, T. P., Perlin, M. S., Lejeune, M., & Macedo, G. R. (2017). A multistage stochastic programming asset-liability management model: An application to the Brazilian pension fund industry. Optimization and Engineering, 18(2), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-016-9316-3

Pachamanova, D., Gülpınar, N., & Çanakoğlu, E. (2017). Robust approaches to pension fund asset liability management under uncertainty. In G. Consigli, D. Kuhn, P. Brandimarte (Eds), International series in operations research & management science (Vol. 245, pp. 89-119). Springer.

Pan, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, X. (2018). Optimal dynamic mean-variance asset-liability management under the Heston model. Advances in Difference Equations, 2018, 258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1677-9

Paula, J. S., & Iquiapaza, R. A. (2022). Investment fund selection techniques from the perspective of Brazilian pension funds. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(88), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113250

Peterson, B., & Carl, P. (2018). Portfolio analytics: Portfolio analysis, including numerical methods for optimization of portfolios. cran.r-project.org/package=PortfolioAnalytics

Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2000.038

Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(7), 1443-1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00271-6

Rodrigues, J. A. (2006). Modelos de amortização de déficits atuariais em fundos de pensão. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 17(Esp 2), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772006000500002

Ryan, R. J. (2014). The evolution of asset/liability management. CFA Institute Research Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2470/rflr.v8.n2.1

Saad, N. S., & Ribeiro, C. O. (2004). Modelos determinísticos de gestão de ativo/passivo: Uma aplicação no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 15(34), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772004000100004

Saad, N. S., & Ribeiro, C. O. (2006). Um modelo de gestão de ativo/passivo: Aplicação para fundos de benefício definido com ativos de fluxo incerto. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 17(Esp 2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772006000500006

Santiago, T. A., & Carvalho, J. V. F. (2020). Análise da oferta ideal de contratos de resseguro utilizando métodos de otimização condicionada. In Anais do 23o SEMEAD (pp. 1-17). São Paulo, SP.

Silva, W. A. M., Malaquias, R. F., & Rech, I. J. (2020). Análise das variáveis que afetam o desempenho de carteira das entidades fechadas de previdência complementar brasileiras. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 17(44), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2020v17n44p54

Sun, J., Li, Z., & Zeng, Y. (2016). Precommitment and equilibrium investment strategies for defined contribution pension plans under a jump-diffusion model. In Insurance: Mathematics and economics (Vol. 67, pp. 158-172). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.01.005

Theußl, S., Schwendinger, F., & Hornik, K. (2020). ROI: An extensible R optimization infrastructure. Journal of Statistical Software, 94(15), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v094.i15

Toukourou, Y. A. F., & Dufresne, F. (2018). On Integrated chance constraints in ALM for pension funds. ASTIN Bulletin, 48(2), 571-609. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2017.49

Valladão, D., & Veiga, Á. (2008, June). Optimum allocation and risk measure in an asset liability management model for a pension fund via multistage stochastic programming and bootstrap. In International Conference on Engineering Optimization. Rio de Janeiro, RJ.

Wang, P., & Li, Z. (2018). Robust optimal investment strategy for an AAM of DC pension plans with stochastic interest rate and stochastic volatility. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 80, 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.03.003

Waring, M. B., & Whitney, D. (2009). An asset-liability version of the capital asset pricing model with a multi-period two-fund theorem. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(4), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2009.35.4.111

Zeng, Y., Li, D., Chen, Z., & Yang, Z. (2018). Ambiguity aversion and optimal derivative-based pension investment with stochastic income and volatility. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 88, 70-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.01.023

Zhang, M., & Chen, P. (2016). Mean-variance asset-liability management under constant elasticity of variance process. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 70, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.05.019