Comparability of Accounting Choices in Subsequent Measurement of Fixed Assets, Intangible Assets, and Investment Property in South American Companies Other Languages

ID:
42040
Abstract:
Expertise on comparability, accounting choices, and fair value is among the most controversial and poorly discussed themes in the current accounting scenario. Accounting choices are needed in order to guarantee a reliable representation, at the same time that their discretionary use may decrease the comparability level expected by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). In this article, we identified the comparability degree of accounting choices in the subsequent measurement of fixed assets, intangible assets, and investment property (IP) for listed companies in Brazil, Chile, and Peru, in addition to check whether certain entity characteristics can influence managers’ accounting choice for fair value. Comparability was measured through the T-index and the explanatory variables were identified through regressions, within the period 2009-2013. It was found that, for fixed assets, national and international comparability increased after IFRS adoption, both increased over time. For intangible assets, there was not a substantial increase in national and international comparability. For IP, national and international comparability did not increase after IFRS adoption, their rates remained close to 0.50 (low comparability) in almost every year. Thus, IFRS adoption alone did not ensure comparability. By using regression analysis, we found that the characteristics industry, audit by big four, country, managers’ remuneration, size, indebtedness, profitability, relevance, and time influenced managers’ accounting choices, indicating the possibility that the choices under analysis have been used for management of outcomes.
ABNT Citation:
SOUZA, F. ?. A.; LEMES, S. Comparability of Accounting Choices in Subsequent Measurement of Fixed Assets, Intangible Assets, and Investment Property in South American Companies . Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 27, n. 71, p. 169-184, 2016.
APA Citation:
Souza, F. ?. A., & Lemes, S. (2016). Comparability of Accounting Choices in Subsequent Measurement of Fixed Assets, Intangible Assets, and Investment Property in South American Companies . Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 27(71), 169-184.
DOI:
10.1590/1808-057x201501480
Permalink:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/42040/comparability-of-accounting-choices-in-subsequent-measurement-of-fixed-assets--intangible-assets--and-investment-property-in-south-american-companies-/i/en
Document type:
Artigo
Language:
Inglês
References:
Ali, M. J.; Ahmed, K.; Henry, D. (2006). Harmonization of Accounting Measurement Practices in South Asia. Advances in International Accounting, v. 19, p. 25-58.

Andrade, M. E. M. C.; Silva, D. M.; Malaquias, R. F. (2013). Escolhas Contábeis em Propriedades para Investimento. Revista Universo Contábil, 9(3), 22-37.

Barth, M. E. (2013). Global Comparability in Financial Reporting: What, Why, How, and When? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 1(1), 2-12.

Barth, M. E. (2014). Measurement in financial reporting: the need for concepts. Accounting Horizons, 28(2), 331-352.

Barth, M. E.; Landsman, W. R.; Lang, M.; Williams, C. (2012). Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 54, p. 68-93.

Brochet, F.; Jogalinzer, A. D.; Riedl, E. J. (2011). Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting, 29(3), 1373-1400.

Cairns, D.; Massoudi, D.; Taplin, R.; Tarca, A. (2011). IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia. The British Accounting Review, v. 43, p. 1-21.

Cascino, S.; Gassen J. (2015). What drives the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), 242-282.

Christensen, H. B.; Nikolaev, V. V. (2013). Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test? Review of Accounting Studies, 18(3), 734-775.

Cole, V.; Branson, J.; Breesch, D. (2008). An analysis of methods to measure the comparability of the consolidated financial statements of the European listed companies from the viewpoint of users. Accountancy & Bedrijfskunde, 28(3), 1-31.

Cole, V.; Branson, J.; Breesch, D. (2009). How to measure the comparability of financial statements? International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 1(4), 379-397.

Cole, V.; Branson, J.; Breesch, D. (2011). Determinants influencing the De facto Comparability of European IFRS Financial Statements. (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1967001

Costa, T. A.; Silva, A. H. C.; Laurencel, L. C. (2013). Escolha de práticas contábeis: um estudo sobre propriedades para investimento em empresas brasileiras não financeiras de capital aberto. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 18, p. 25-36.

Cullinan, C. P. (1999). International Trade and Accounting Policy Choice: Theory and Canadian Evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(4), 597-607.

Demaria, S. & Dufour, D. (2007). First time adoption of IFRS, Fair value option, Conservatism: Evidences from French listed companies. In 30ème Colloque de l'EAA. (p. 24p). Retrieved from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/26/61/89/PDF/First_adoption_and_fair_value_DemariaDufour.pdf

Detzen, D.; Zülch, H. (2012). Executive compensation and goodwill recognition under IFRS: Evidence from European mergers. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, v. 21, p. 106-126.

Durocher, S.; Gendron Y. (2011) IFRS: On the Docility of Sophisticated Users in Preserving the Ideal of Comparability. European Accounting Review, 20(2), 233-262.

Fields, T. D.; Lys, T. Z.; Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 255-307.

Francis, J. (2001). Discussion of empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 309-319.

Gray, S. J.; Linthicum, C. L.; Street, D. L. (2009) Have European and US GAAP measures of income and equity converged under IFRS?Evidence from European companies listed in the US. Accounting and Business Research, 39(5), 431-447.

Grupo Latinoamericano de Emisores de Normas de Información Financiera - GLENIF. (2014). Nd. Retrieved from http://glenif.org

Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics. 4 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Haller, A.; Wehrfritz, M. (2013). The impact of national GAAP and accounting traditions on IFRS policy selection - evidence from Germany and the UK. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, v. 22, p. 39-56.

Haverty, J. L. (2006). Are IFRS and US GAAP converging?Some evidence from People’s Republic of China companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, v. 15, p. 48-71.

Hosmer, D. W.; Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. 2 ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hou, Q.; Jin, Q.; Wang, L. (2014) Mandatory IFRS adoption and executive compensation: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, v. 7, p. 9-29.

International Accounting Standards Board - IASB. (2011). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Retrieved from http://www. ifrs.org

International Financial Reporting Standards - IFRS. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.ifrs.org/Use-around-the-world/Pages/Analysisof-the-IFRS-jurisdictional-profiles.aspx

Jaafar, A.; McLeay, S. (2007). Country Effects and Sector Effects on the Harmonization of Accounting Policy Choice. Abacus, 43(2), 156-189.

Liao, Q.; Sellhorn, T.; Skaife, H. A. (2012). The Cross-Country Comparability of IFRS Earnings and Book Values: Evidence from France and Germany. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 155-184.

Liu, C.; O’Farrell, G. (2010). Net Income Comparability between EU-IFRS and US-GAAP before release n° 33.8879: evidence from fifty US-Listed European Union Companies. International Journal of Business, Accounting, and Finance, 4(1), 49-62.

Lo, K. (2008). Earnings management and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 45, p. 350-357.

Martins, V. A.; Pinto, M.; Alcoforado, E. (2012). Escolhas Contábeis na Mensuração de Propriedades para Investimento das Empresas Brasileiras de Capital Aberto. Anais do Congresso Nacional de Administração e Ciências Contábeis, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 3.

Muller, K. A.; Riedl, E. J.; Sellhorn, T. (2008). Causes and Consequences of Choosing Historical Cost versus Fair Value. Retrieved from http://nd.edu/~carecob/May2008Conference/Papers/RiedlMRS03062008.pdf

Murcia, F. D.; Werges, A. (2011). Escolhas contábeis no mercado brasileiro: divulgação voluntária de informações versus gerenciamento de resultados. Revista Universo Contábil, 7(2), 28-44.

Parker, R. H.; Morris, R. D. (2001). The influence of US GAAP on the Harmony of Accounting Measurement Policies of Large Companies in the U.K. and Australia. Abacus, 37(3), 297-328.

Peng, S.; Smith, J. V. D. A. (2010). Chinese GAAP and IFRS: An analysis of the convergence process. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, v. 19, p. 16-34.

Souza, F. E. A.; Botinha, R. A.; Silva, P. R.; Lemes, S. (2015). A Comparabilidade das Escolhas Contábeis na Avaliação Posterior de Propriedades para Investimento: Uma Análise das Companhias Abertas Brasileiras e Portuguesas. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 26(68), 154-166.

Taplin, R. H. (2004). A unified approach to the measurement of international accounting harmony. Accounting and Business Research, 34(1), 57-73.

Taplin, R. H. (2006). A practical guide to constructing specialised indices of international accounting harmony using the harmoniser software. Financial Reporting, Regulation and Governance, 5(1), 1-28.

Taplin, R. H. (2010). Statistical inference using the T-Index to quantify the level of comparability between accounts. Accounting and Business Research, 40(1), 75-103.

Taplin, R. H. (2011). The Measurement of Comparability in Accounting Research. Abacus, 47(3), 383-409.

Taplin, R. H.; Verona, R.; Doni, F. (2011). The process of global convergence IFRS/US-GAAP: An empirical analysis on IFRS-compliant and US GAAP-compliant financial statements. Proceedings of the Accounting Renaissance: Lessons from the Crisis and Looking into the Future Veneza, Italy.

Taplin, R. H.; Yuan, W.; Brown, A. (2014). The use of fair value and historical cost accounting for investment properties in China. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 8(1), 101-113.

Tudor, A. T.; Dragu, I. M. (2010). Impact of International Financial Reporting Standards on Accounting Practices Harmonization within European Union - Particular Case of Intangible Assets. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 12(1), 191-206.

Watts, R. L. (1992). Accounting choice theory and market-based research in accounting. British Accounting Review, v. 24, p. 235-267.

Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207-221.

Watts, R. L.; Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Yip, R. W. Y.; Young, D. (2012). Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767-1789.

Zeff, A. S. (2007). Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review, v. 39, p. 290-302.

Zhang, Y.; Andrew, J. (2010). Land in China: Re-considering comparability in financial reporting. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 53-75.