A estrutura de artefatos de controle gerencial no processo de inovação: existe associação com o perfil estratégico?

ID:
34480
Resumo:
Este estudo investiga o papel dos perfis estratégicos e instrumentos do controle gerencial no processo de inovação das organizações. Com base em uma pesquisa utilizando modelagem de equações estruturais (121 empresas), confirmamos que os perfis analisador, defensor e prospector estão associados com o planejamento estratégico, balanced scorecard (BSC) e rolling forecast. O tipo reativo é associado a um menor uso de artefatos. Nossos resultados confirmam a ligação entre a inovação incremental e planejamento estratégico e entre inovação radical e BSC. Estes resultados refletem o alinhamento entre os tipos estratégicos, a disponibilidade de instrumentos e intensidade da inovação, que é informação útil para compreender as organizações e suas atividades de mercado. Este trabalho traz informações sobre a existência de instrumentos de controle de gerenciamento específicos e o impacto para a intensidade da inovação que é relevante para a gestão e deve estimular as organizações a serem consistentes nos casos em que o perfil estratégico é uma definição clara de longo prazo ou de ver a possibilidade de mudança quando essa não é a desejada.
Citação ABNT:
FREZATTI, F.; BIDO, D. S.; CRUZ, A. P. C.; MACHADO, M. J. C. A estrutura de artefatos de controle gerencial no processo de inovação: existe associação com o perfil estratégico?. Brazilian Business Review, v. 12, n. 1, p. 129-156, 2015.
Citação APA:
Frezatti, F., Bido, D. S., Cruz, A. P. C., & Machado, M. J. C. (2015). A estrutura de artefatos de controle gerencial no processo de inovação: existe associação com o perfil estratégico?. Brazilian Business Review, 12(1), 129-156.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2015.12.6
Link Permanente:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/34480/a-estrutura-de-artefatos-de-controle-gerencial-no-processo-de-inovacao--existe-associacao-com-o-perfil-estrategico-/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Português
Referências:
ABERNETHY, M. A.; BROWNELL, P. The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 24, n. 3, p. 189-204, 1999.

ADAMS, R. BESSANT, J.; PHELPS, R. Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, v.8, n. 1, p.21-47, 2006.

ALI, A. Pioneering Versus Incremental Innovation : Review and Research Propositions. Framework, p. 46-61. 2000.

ARCAND, S. et al. Sociología de la empresa: del marco histórico a las dinámicas internas. Bogota: Siglo del Hombre, 2010.

AX, C.; BJORNENAK, T. Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations?The case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden. Management Accounting Research, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2005.

BERRY, A. J.; BROADBENT, J.; OTLEY, D. Management control: theories, issues and performance. 2 ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

BISBE, J.; MALAGUEÑO, R. The Choice of Interactive Control Systems under Different Innovation Management Modes. European Accounting Review, v. 18, n. 2, p. 371-405, 2009.

BISBE, J.; OTLEY, D. The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 29, p. 709-737, 2004.

BOULIANNE, E. Revisiting fit between AIS design and performance with the analyzer strategic-type. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1- 16, 2007.

BURNS, T.; STALKER, G. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.

CADEZ, S.; GUILDING, C. An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 33, n. 7/8, p. 836-863, 2008.

CHENHALL, R. H.; KALLUNKI, J. P.; SILVOLA, H. Exploring the relationships between strategy, innovation, and management control systems: the roles of social networking, organic innovative culture, and formal controls. Journal of Management Accounting Research, v. 23, n. 1, p. 99-128, 2011.

CHONG, K. M.; MAHAMA, H. The impact of interactive and diagnostic uses of budgets on team effectiveness. Management Accounting Research. In press.

DAFT, R. L. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, v. 21, n. 2, p. 193-210, 1978.

DAMANPOUR, F.; EVAN, W. M. Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of 'organizational lag'. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 29, n. 3, p. 392-409, 1984.

DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555-590, 1991.

DAVILA, T. The promise of management control systems for innovation and strategic change. In: C. Chapman (Ed.); Controlling strategy: management, accounting, and performance measurement. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 37-61.

DJELLAL, F.; GALLOUJ, F. Innovation and employment effects in services: a review of the literature and an agenda for research. The Service Industries Journal, v. 27, n. 3, p. 193-214, 2007.

EMMANUEL, C.; OTLEY, D.; MERCHANT, K. Accounting for management control. 2. ed. London: Thomson Learning, 1990.

ETTLIE, J. E.; BRIDGES, W. P.;O'KEEFE, R. D. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental. Management Science, v. 30, n. 6, p. 682-695, 1984.

FERREIRA, A.; MOULANG, C.; HENDRO, B. Environmental management accounting and innovation: an exploratory analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 23, n. 7, p. 920-948, 2010.

FERREIRA, A.; OTLEY, D. The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research. v. 20, n. 4, p. 263-282, 2009.

FRAMBACH, R. T.; SCHILLEWAERT, N. Organizational innovation adoption: a multilevel framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, v. 55, n. 2, p. 163-176, 2002.

FREEMAN, C. The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 3, n. 1, p. 15-34, 2004.

GERWIN, D.; KOLODNY, H. Management of advanced manufacturing technology: strategy, organisation and innovation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

GOSSELIN, M. The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 22, n. 2, p. 105-122, 1997.

HAIR JR.; J. F. et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2014.

HANSEN, A.; MOURITSEN, J. Strategies and organizational problems: constructing corporate value and coherence in balanced scorecard process. In: C. S. Chapman (Ed.). Controlling strategy: management, accounting, and performance measurement. Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 125-150.

HYVÖNEN, J. Strategy , performance measurement techniques and information technology of the firm and their links to organizational performance. Management Accounting Research, v. 18, p. 343-366, 2007.

ITTNER, C. D.; LARCKER, D. F. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting : a value-based management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 32, p. 349-410, 2001.

ITTNER, C. D.; LARCKER, D. F.; MEYER, M. W. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review, v. 78, n. 3, p. 725-758, 2003.

KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.

KOBERG, C. S.; DETIENNE, D. R.; HEPPARD, K. A. An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. Journal of High Technology Manegement Research, v. 14, p. 21-45, 2003.

KOBER, R.; NG, J.; PAUL, B. J. The interrelationship between management control mechanisms and strategy. Management Accounting Research. v. 18, p. 425-452, 2007.

LAFORET, S. Size, Strategic and market orientation effects on innovation. Journal of Business Research, v. 61, p. 753-764, 2008.

LU, T.; CHEN, J. Incremental or radical ?A study of organizational innovation: an artificial world approach. Expert Systems With Applications, v. 37, n. 12, p. 8193-8200, 2010.

MACINTOSH, N. B. Management accounting and control systems: an organizational and behavioral approach. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1995.

MACINTOSH, N. B.; QUATTRONE, P. Management accounting and control systems: an organizational and sociological approach. 2. ed. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2010.

MAGALHÃES, M. F. Inovando para durar. In: J. C. C. Terra (Ed.). Inovação quebrando paradigmas para vencer. São Paulo: Saravia, 2007. p.41-54.

MALERBA, F. How and why innovation differs across sectors. In: FAGERBERG, J.; MOWERY, D. C.; NELSON, R. R. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 380-406.

MAVONDO, F. T. Regulation, deregulation, and free market: the food manufacturing industry in Zimbabwe. Journal of Business Research, v. 50, n. 3, p. 305-319, 2000.

MERCHANT, K. A.; VAN DER STEDE, W. A. Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. 2. ed. Essex: Prentice Hall, 2007.

MILES, R.; SNOW, C. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

MILES, R.; SNOW, C. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.

MILLER, D.; FRIESEN, P. H. A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1161-1183, 1984.

MORGAN, R. E.; STRONG, C. A. Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, v. 56, n. 3, p. 163-176, 2003.

NARANJO-GIL, D.; HARTMANN, F. Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 32, p. 735-756, 2007.

NARANJO-GIL, D.; MAAS, V.; HARTMANN, F. How CFOs determine management accounting innovation: an examination of direct and indirect effects. European Accounting Review, v. 18, n. 4, p. 667-695, 2009.

NETEMEYER, R. G.; BEARDEN, W. O.; SHARMA, S. Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Sage Publications, 2003.

NGO, L. V.; O’CASS, A. Innovation and business success: the mediating role of customer participation. Journal of Business Research, v. 66, n. 8, p. 1134-1142, 2013.

OYADOMARI, J. C. T. et al. Management control systems: comparative case study in Brazilian innovatives companies. Revista Universo Contábil, v. 6, n. 4, p. 21-34, 2010.

PORTAL BRASIL NET. Cotações diárias para o mês de dezembro de 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 16 dez.2013. 2009.

REVELLINO, S.; MOURITSEN, J. The multiplicity of controls and the making of innovation the multiplicity of controls and the making of innovation. European Accounting Review, v. 18, n. 2, p. 341-369, 2009.

RINGLE, C. M.; WENDE, S.; WILL, A. SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (beta). Germany: University of Hamburg, 2005. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 23 dez.2013. 2005.

ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press, 1995.

SIMONS, R. Accounting control systems and business strategy: an empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 12, n. 4, p. 357-374, 1987.

SIMONS, R. Levers of control: how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 1995.

TUSHMAN, M. L.; ANDERSON, P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 31, p. 439-486, 1986.

UN, C. A. Journal of engineering and an empirical multi-level analysis for achieving balance between incremental and radical innovations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 27, n. 1-2, p. 1-19, 2010.

VARADARAJAN, R. Fortune at the bottom of the innovation pyramid: the strategic logic of incremental innovations. Business Horizons, v. 52, n. 1, p. 21-29, 2009.

VERONA, G. A resource based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, v. 24, n. 1, p. 132-142, 1999.

WELSCH, G. A.; HILTON, R.; GORDON, P. Budgeting: profit planning and control. 5. ed. Prentice Hall College Div. 1988.