Cressey’s Fraud Triangle (1953) and Agency Theory: Study Applied to Brazilian Banking Institutions Other Languages

ID:
46967
Abstract:
This research examined if Cressey’s (1953) fraud triangle and the agency theory, jointly, enables investigate corporate fraud occurrence in Brazilian banking institutions. It was formulated six research hypotheses were segregated in fraud triangle – pressure, opportunity and rationalization – and measured by variables taken from the agency theory, criminology and empirical papers on corporate fraud. The identification of probability of fraud occurrence was operationalized from multinomial logistic model, applied to data of 44 banking, for the period between January 2001 and December 2012. For element pressure, hypotheses No. 01 was confirmed, since this showed that the lower an institution’s previous performance, the greater probability there is of fraudulent events occurring in the future. In the element of opportunity, the hypothesis No. 03 was confirmed, which showed that low corporate governance indicators increased the possibility of fraud occurrences. In rationalization element, the hypothesis No. 08 was confirmed, therefore, the predominance of women in management reduces the probability of fraud. We thereby conclude that Cressey’s Triangle, when combined with the theory of agency is an appropriate research instrument to use when carrying out an investigation into corporate fraud occurrence in banking institutions.
ABNT Citation:
MACHADO, M. R. R.; GARTNER, I. R. Triângulo de Fraudes de Cressey (1953) e Teoria da Agência: Estudo Aplicado a Instituições Bancárias Brasileiras . Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, v. 14, n. 32, p. 108-140, 2017.
APA Citation:
Machado, M. R. R., & Gartner, I. R. (2017). Triângulo de Fraudes de Cressey (1953) e Teoria da Agência: Estudo Aplicado a Instituições Bancárias Brasileiras . Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 14(32), 108-140.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2017v14n32p108
Permalink:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/46967/cressey---s-fraud-triangle--1953--and-agency-theory--study-applied-to-brazilian-banking-institutions--/i/en
Document type:
Artigo
Language:
Português
References:
ALCHIAN, A. A.; DEMSETZ, H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. The American Economic Review, v. 62, n. 5, p. 777-795, 1972.

ALEXANDER, C. R.; COHEN, M. A. New Evidence on the Origins of Corporate Crime. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 17, p. 421-435, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199607)17:4%3C421::AIDMDE771%3E3.0.CO;2-U. 1996.

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (AICPA). Statement on Auditing Standards Nº 99. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. New York: AICPA, p. 163-214, 2002.

BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Circular 3.630, de 29 de fevereiro de 2013. Dispensa as instituições financeiras e demais instituições autorizadas a funcionar pelo Banco Central do Brasil da elaboração e remessa do documento Informações Financeiras Trimestrais (IFT). Disponível em: < http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos/>. Acesso em: 07 de nov. de 2013.

BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Resolução nº 3.786, de 24 de setembro de 2009. Dispõe sobre a elaboração e a divulgação de demonstrações contábeis consolidadas com base no padrão contábil internacional emitido pelo International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Disponível em: < http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos>. Acesso em: 07 nov. 2009.

BEASLEY, M. S. Empirical Analysis the of Board the Relation of Financial Between Composition Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, v. 71, n. 4, p. 443-465, 1996.

BERGER, A. N. et al. Corporate Governance and Bank Performance: A joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 29, n. 8-9, p. 2179-2221, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.013. 2005.

BM&FBOVESPA. Selos de Governança Corporativa: a marca do compromisso. Disponível em . Acesso em: 07 de ago. de2014.

BRAZEL, J. F.; JONES, K. L.; ZIMBELMAN, M. F. Using Nonfinancial Measures to Assess Fraud Risk. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1135-1166, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00349.x . 2009.

BRITO, R. Comissão pedirá dados à SEC de apuração sobre Petrobras. Exame, São Paulo, 27 nov. 2014. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 29 nov. 2014.

BYRD, J.; PARRINO R.; PRITSCH, G. Stockholder-Manager Conflicts and Firm Value. Financial Analysts Journal, v. 54, n. 3, p. 14-30, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v54.n3.2177 . 1998

COENEN, T L. Essential of Corporate Fraud. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118386156 . 2008.

CONSELHO FEDERAL DE CONTABILIDADE. Resolução nº 1.207 de 27 de novembro de 2009. Aprova a NBC TA 240 - Responsabilidade do Auditor em Relação a Fraude, no Contexto da Auditoria de Demonstrações Contábeis. Disponível em:< http://www.cfc.org.br>. Acesso em: 07 nov. 2009.

CRAMER, J. S.; RIDDER, G. Pooling States in the Multinomial Logit Model. Journal of Econometrics, v. 47, p. 267-272, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(91)90102J. 1991.

CRESSEY, D. R. Other People’s Money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: The free press, 1953.

CRUTCHLEY, C. E.; JENSEN, M. R. H.; MARSHALL, B. B. Climate for Scandal: Corporate Environments that Contribute to Accounting Fraud. The Financial Review, v. 42, p. 53-73, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2007.00161.x. 2007.

DECHOW, P. M.; SLOAN, R. G.; SWEENEY, A. P. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-36, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x. 1996.

ERICKSON, M.; HANLON, M.; MAYDEW, E. L. Is There a Link between Executive Equity Incentives and Accounting Fraud? Journal of Accounting Research, v. 44, n. 1, p. 113-143, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00194.x. 2006.

FAMA, E. F. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, v. 25, n. 2, p. 383-417, 1970. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2325486. 1970.

FIELDS, T. D.; LYS, T. Z.; VINCENT, L. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 255-307, n. set. 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3. 2001.

GARTNER, I. R. Modelagem Multiatributos Aplicada à Avaliação do Desempenho Econômico-Financeiro de Empresas. Pesquisa Operacional, v. 30, n. 3, p. 619-636, 2010.

GOLDBERG, V. P. Regulaffon and administered contracts. The Bell Journal of Economics, v. 7, n. 2, p. 426-448, 1976.

GRELLET, F. PF busca provas de fraude nos Correios do Rio. Exame. São Paulo, 27 nov. 2014. . Acesso em: 29 nov. 2014.

GRILLI, L.; RAMPICHINI, C. A Multilevel Multinomial Logit Model for the Analysis of Graduates’ Skills. Statistical Methods and Applications, v. 16, n. 3, p. 381-393, 2007.

HAAN, P.; UHLENDORFF, A. Estimation of Multinomial Logit Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity using Maximum Simulated Likelihood. The Stata Journal, v. 6, n. 2, p. 229- 245, 2006.

HAMBRICK, D. C. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. The Academy of Management Review, v. 32, n. 2, p. 334-343. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254. 2007.

HAYNES, M.; WESTERN, M.; SPALLEK, M. Methods for Categorical Longitudinal Survey Data: Understanding Employment Status of Australian Women. In: HILDA Survey Research Conference. 2005. Melbourne. Anais... Melbourne: University of Melbourne, p. 124. 2005.

HILBE, J. M. Logistic Regression Models. New York: CRC Press, 2009.

JENSEN, C.; MECKLING, H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, p. 305-360, 1976. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

JENSEN, M. C. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow , Corporate Finance , and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, v. 76, n. 2, p. 323-329, 1986.

JENSEN, M. C.; MURPHY, K. J. Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, v. 98, n. 2, p. 225-264, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261677

JOHN, K.; SENBET, L. W. Corporate Governance and Board e Effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 22, p. 371-403, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S03784266(98)00005-3

KELLEY, S. W.; FERRELL, O. C.; SKINNER, S. J. Ethical Behavior Among Marketing Researchers : An Assessment of Selected Demographic Characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 9, p. 681-688, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00383395

LENNOX, C.; PITTMAN, J. A. Big Five Audits and Accounting Fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 209-247, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.19113846.2010.01007.x

LOCHNER, L. Education, Work, and Crime: A human capital approach. International Economic Review, v. 45, n. 3, p. 811-843, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.00206598.2004.00288.x. 2004.

LONG, J. S.; FREESE, J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2. ed. Texas: Stata Press, 2006.

LOU, Y.; WANG, M. Fraud Risk Factor of the Fraud Triangle Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research, v. 7, n. 2, p. 61-78, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262. 2009.

MACEY, J. R. Agency Theory and the Criminal Liability of Organizations. Boston University Law Review, v. 71, p. 315-340, 1991.

MACIEL, L. et al. Impacto dos Contratos Futuros do Ibovespa na Volatilidade dos Índices de Ações no Brasil: Uma análise na crise do subprime. Estudos econômicos, v. 42, p. 801-825, 2012.

MARKIN, R. J. The role of rationalization in consumer decision processes: A revisionist approach to consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 7, n. 4, p. 316-334, 1979. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02729682. 1979.

MATOUSEK, R. et al. Bank Performance and Convergence During the Financial Crisis: Evidence from the “old” European Union and Eurozone. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. XXX, p. 2-9, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.08.012. 2014.

MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL - MPF. Procuradores da Força Tarefa concederão entrevista coletiva, às 14h, na sede do MPF/Paraná, em Curitiba. Curitiba, 22 ago. 2014. Disponível em . Acesso em: 07 set. 2014.

POSNER, R. A. Economic analysis of law. 7. ed. Chicago: Aspen Publishers, 2007.

PRIMO, U. R. et al. Determinantes da rentabilidade bancária no Brasil. BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 10, n. 4, p. 308-323, 2013.

RAHN, W. M.; KROSNICK, J. A.; BREUNING, M. Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, v. 38, n. 3, p. 582-600, 1994.

REYNOLDS, S. J. A Neurocognitive Model of the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Implications for Study and Practice. The Journal of applied psychology, v. 91, n. 4, p. 737- 48, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.737. 2006.

ROSEN, Sherwin. Contracts and the Market for Executives. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1990. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 07 jul. 1990.

ROSS, S. A. The Economic The Theory of Agency: Principal’s Problem. The American Economic Review, v. 63, n. 2, p. 134-139, 1973.

RYAN, H. E.; WIGGINS, R. A. The influence of firm- and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, v. 7, n. 2, p. 101-123, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(00)00021-3. 2001.

SADKA, G. The Economic Consequences of Accounting Fraud in Product Markets: Theory and a Case from the US Telecommunications Industry (WorldCom). American Law and Economics Review, v. 8, n. 3, p. 439-475, 2006.

SCHEUFELE, D. A. Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication. Mass Comunication & Society, v. 3, n. 2/3, p. 297-316, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07. 2000.

SCHRAND, C. M.; ZECHMAN, S. L. C. Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 53, n. 1-2, p. 311-329, fev. 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001. 2012.

SILVA, A. L. C. Governança Corporativa, Valor, Alavancagem e Política de Dividendos das Empresas Brasileiras. Revista de Administração, v. 39, n. 4, p. 348-361, 2004.

SINGLETON, T. W.; SINGLETON, A. J. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. 4. ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118269183. 2010.

SKRONDAL, A.; RABE-HESKETH, S. Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203489437. 2004.

SKRONDAL, A.; RABE-HESKETH, S. Multilevel Logistic Regression for Polytomous Data and Rankings. Psychometrika, v. 68, n. 2, p. 267-287, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294801. 2003.

STEFFENSMEIER, D. J.; SCHWARTZ, J.; ROCHE, M. Gender and Twenty-First-Century Corporate Crime: Female Involvement and the Gender Gap in Enron-Era Corporate Frauds. American Sociological Review, v. 78, n. 3, p. 448-476, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122413484150. 2013.

TRAIN, K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271. 2003.

TRAPP, A. C. G. A Relação do Conselho Fiscal como Componente de Controle no Gerenciamento de Resultados Contábeis. 2009. 133 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Contábeis). Departamento de Contabilidade e Atuária da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2009.

TROY, C.; SMITH, K. G.; DOMINO, M. A. CEO demographics and accounting fraud: Who is more likely to rationalize illegal acts? Strategic Organization, v. 9, n. 4, p. 259-282, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127011421534. 2011.

TYMOIGNE, É. Securitization, Deregulation, Economic Stability, and Financial Crisis. Part I: The evolution of securitization. Working paper, Nova York, Levy Economics Institute, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1458408. 2009.

WANG, T.; HSU, C. Board composition and operational risk events of financial institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 37, n. 6, p. 2042-2051, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.027. 2013.

WANG, T. Y. Corporate Securities Fraud: Insights from a New Empirical Framework. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, v. 9, p. 1-34, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewr009. 2011.

WANG, T. Y. U. E.; WINTON, A.; YU, X. Corporate Fraud and Business Conditions: Evidence from IPOs. The Journal of Finance, v. LXV, n. 6, p. 2255-2292, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01615.x. 2010

ZAHRA, S. A.; PRIEM, R. L.; RASHEED, A. A. Understanding the Causes and Effects of Top Management Fraud. Organizational Dynamics, v. 36, n. 2, p. 122-139, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2007.03.002. 2007.