62443

Isabela Neves Ferraz
Carlos Denner dos Santos Júnior

Brazilian Business Review

Este trabalho objetivou entender o que são projetos de software livre comunitários e quais características de governança (estrutura e controle) que os diferenciam das organizações tradicionais, trazendo reflexões sobre esse modelo de negócio. Foi realizada revisão de literatura que delineou as principais percepções dos estudos no tema, bem como pesquisa exploratória qualitativa, envolvendo análise documental e entrevistas com quatro participantes brasileiros que atuam na gestão de projetos distintos. A pesquisa exploratória tratou-se de contato preliminar com o campo investigado, para tornar os argumentos trazidos mais robustos. Dentre as reflexões, observa-se que mesmo sendo possível distinguir os projetos de software livre comunitários das organizações tradicionais, um fator crucial nem sempre considerado refere-se às transformações decorrentes do desenvolvimento desses projetos. É preciso que os estudos considerem o contexto de funcionamento, bem como as mudanças e relacionamentos interorganizacionais estabelecidos pelos projetos ao longo do tempo. Consideradas essas questões, acredita-se que aproximações dos projetos com as organizações tradicionais possam acontecer, ainda que características comunitárias sejam mantidas.

Comunidades, Controle, Estrutura, Governança, Projetos de Software Livre

FERRAZ, I. N.; SANTOS JÚNIOR, C. D. D. Organização de Projetos de Software Livre e de Código Aberto: Entre a Comunidade e a Governança Tradicional. Brazilian Business Review, v. 18, n. 3, p. 334-352, 2021.

Ferraz, I. N., & Santos Júnior, C. D. D. (2021). Organização de Projetos de Software Livre e de Código Aberto: Entre a Comunidade e a Governança Tradicional. Brazilian Business Review, 18(3), 334-352.

http://dx.doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2021.18.3.6

https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/62443/organizacao-de-projetos-de-software-livre-e-de-codigo-aberto--entre-a-comunidade-e-a-governanca-tradicional/i/pt-br

Artigo

Português

Adler, P., Heckscher, C., & Prusak, L. (2011). Cómo construir una empresa colaborativa: cuatro claves para crear una cultura de confianza y trabajo en equipo. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 44-52.

Aldrich, H. E. (2007). Organizations and environments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Arazy, O., Daxenberger, J., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Nov, O., & Gurevych, I. (2016). Turbulent stability of emergent roles: The dualistic nature of self-organizing knowledge coproduction. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 792-812.

Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Chen, K. K., & O’Mahony, S. (2009). Differentiating organizational boundaries. In B. G. King, T. Felin, & D. A. Whetten. (Eds.). Studying Differences Between Organizations: Comparative Approaches to Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 183-220.

Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2003). Corporate governance and new organizational forms: Issues of double and multiple agency. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(4), 337-360.

Crowston, K., Wei, K., Li, Q., Eseryel, Y., & Howison, J. (2007). Self-organization of teams in free/libre open source software development. Information and Software Technology Journal, 49(6), 564-575.

Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., & Rullani, F. (2008). Online communities and open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 115-123.

Dahlander, L., & O’Mahony, S. (2011). Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organization Science, 22(4), 961-979.

Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M. W. (2006). A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy, 35(8), 1243-1259.

Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.

Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2006). Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: The emergence of bazaar governance. Organization Studies, 27(10), 1447-1466.

Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435-457.

Eseryel, U. Y., Wei, K., & Crowston, K. (2020). Decision-making Processes in Community-based Free/Libre Open Source Software-development Teams with Internal Governance: An Extension to Decision-making Theory. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 46(1), 20.

Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224-1239.

Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 734-750.

Forte, A., Larco, V., & Bruckman, A. (2009). Decentralization in Wikipedia governance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 49-72.

German, D. M. (2003). The GNOME project: A case study of open source, global software development. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8(4), 201-215.

Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions? Earth System Governance, n. 2, p. 1-14.

Grabher, G., & Ibert, O. (2014). Distance as asset? Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 97-123.

Guimarães, A. L., Korn, H. J., Shin, N., & Eisner, A. B. (2013). The life cycle of open source software development communities. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 167-182.

Hamersly, W. J. (2015). Business governance best practices of virtual project teams. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.

Kolbjørnsrud, V. (2016). Agency problems and governance mechanisms in collaborative communities. Strategic Organization, Special Issue Article. p. 1-36.

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, London. Lattemann, C., & Stieglitz, S. (2005). Framework for governance in open source communities. Proceedings of the HICSS, Hawaii. p. 192-201.

Lattemann, C., & Stieglitz, S. (2005). Framework for governance in open source communities. Proceedings of the HICSS, Hawaii. p. 192-201.

Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633-649.

Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2016). Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 751-772.

Li, X., Yoo, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Searching for “Stability” in Fluidity: A Routine-based View of Open Source Software Development Process. Proceedings of the ICIS. Dublin.

Li-Ying, J., & Salomo, S. R. (2013). Design of governance in virtual communities: definition, mechanisms, and variation patterns. International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise, 3(4), 225-251.

Mäenpää, H., Munezero, M., Fagerholm, F., & Mikkonen, T. (2017). The many hats and the broken binoculars: State of the practice in developer community management. Proceedings of the OpenSym, Galway. p.1-9.

Markus, M. L. (2007). The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? Journal of Management & Governance, 11(2), 151-163.

Mintzberg, H. (2011). Criando organizações eficazes: estrutura em cinco configurações. São Paulo: Atlas.

Miscione, G., Ziolkowski, R., Zavolokina, L., & Schwabe, G. (2018). Tribal governance: The business of blockchain authentication. Proceedings of the HICSS, Hawaii. p. 1-10.

Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. (2009). 10 coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463-502.

O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079-1106.

O’Mahony, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Organizations in the shadow of communities. In C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, R. Greenwood (Eds.). Communities and Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 3-36.

Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833-848.

Panchal, J. H. (2010). Coordination in collective product innovation. Proceedings of the ASME. Vancouver. p. 333-346.

Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12(3), 23-49.

Raymond, E. (2005). The cathedral and the bazaar. (originally published in volume 3, number 3, march 1998). First Monday.

Robbins, S. P. (2010). Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education.

Santos, C., Kuk, G., Kon, F., & Pearson, J (2013). The attraction of contributors in free and open source software projects. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, n. 22, p. 26-45.

Santos junior, C. D.; Kuk, G.; Kon, F.; Suguiura, R. (2011). The inextricable role of organizational sponsorship for open source sustainability. Proceedings of SOS.

Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Seidel, M. D. L., & Stewart, K. J. (2011). An initial description of the C-form. In C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.). Communities and Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 37-72.

Seidel, V. P., & O’Mahony, S. (2014). Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation. Organization Science, 25(3), 691-712.

Shah, S. K. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52(7), 1000-1014.

Shaikh, M., & Vaast, E. (2016). Folding and unfolding: balancing openness and transparency in open source communities. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 813-833.

Simeray, J. P. (1978). A estrutura da empresa. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.

Stewart, D. (2005). Social status in an open-source community. American Sociological Review, 70(5), 823-842.

Stewart, K. J., & Gosain, S. (2006). The moderating role of development stage in free/open source software project performance. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 11(2), 177-191.

Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., & Tan, B. C. (2011). Deriving IT-mediated task coordination portfolios for global virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54(2), 133-151.

Vasconcellos, E., & Hemsley, J. R. (2002). Estrutura das organizações. São Paulo: Thomson Pioneira Learning.

Vilariño, J. P., & Schoenherr, R. A. (1987). Racionalidad y control en las organizaciones complejas. Reis, n. 39, p. 119-139.

Vincent, C., Camp, J. (2004). Looking to the Internet for models of governance. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 161-173.

Viseur, R., & Charleux, A. (2019). Changement de gouvernance et communautés open source: le cas du logiciel Claroline. Innovations, (1), 71-104.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

West, J., & O’Mahony, S. (2005). Contrasting community building in sponsored and community founded open source projects. Proceedings of the HICSS, Hawaii, 196c.

Xu, B., Lin, Z.; Xu, Y. (2011). A study of open source software development from control perspective. Journal of Database Management, 22(1), 26-42.

Xu, B., Xu, Y., & Lin, Z. (2005). Control in open source software development. Proceedings of the AMCIS, Omaha, 433.

Zebari, R. R., Zeebaree, S. R., Jacksi, K., & Shukur, H. M. (2019). E-business requirements for flexibility and implementation enterprise system: A review. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(11), 655-660.

Zhan, Y., Bai, Y., & Liu, Z. (2007). Virtual Team Governance: Addressing the Governance Mechanisms and Virtual Team Performance. In W. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Duan, L. Yan, H. Li, and X. Yang. (Ed). Integration and Innovation Orient to E-Society. Boston: Springer, 282-288.

Zheng, Y., Zhao, K., & Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, n. 56, p. 513-524.