78521

Elize Jacinto Matos
Ana Luize Correa Bertoncini
Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa Ames
Mauricio Custódio Serafim

Revista de Administração Mackenzie

Objetivo: Discutir os impactos do uso da inteligência artificial generativa (GenAI) no ensino e pesquisa em Administração com a lente de investigação da ética das virtudes para a reflexão dos impactos da tecnologia sobre as pessoas. Originalidade/valor: Consideramos os riscos e as possibilidades concernentes ao emprego da GenAI, especialmente o ChatGPT. Categorizamos os impactos da GenAI no ensino e pesquisa, mapeando artigos centrados no agente ou em ações e classificando suas perspectivas éticas subjacentes (deontologia, utilitarismo, ética das virtudes), reconhecendo que a ética da inteligência artificial se concentra em princípios utilitários e regulações. Destacamos o aspecto humano na análise, para superar a superficialidade no tratamento dos impactos na formação das pessoas. Design/metodologia/abordagem: Conduzimos uma revisão semi-sistemática da literatura recente sobre GenAI no ensino e pesquisa em Administração. Utilizamos o método PRISMA para coleta e seleção de artigos em três bases de dados acadêmicas, Scopus, Science Direct e Web of Science, além do Google Scholar. Desde 45 artigos, mapeamos três questões principais: nível de análise, perspectiva ética e impactos da GenAI. Resultados: Destacamos que o uso da GenIA para a aprendizagem do estudante e a formação do investigador em termos de virtudes ou caráter são incipientes, enquanto as questões éticas são mencionadas implícita ou superficialmente. A GenAI pode contribuir tanto para o aumento quanto para a redução do desenvolvimento humano e da pesquisa, a depender de seu uso apropriado em processos de aprendizagem e investigação. Uma sólida fundamentação na ética das virtudes é essencial para entendermos profundamente a relação homem-IA.

ChatGPT, ensino e pesquisa, ética das virtudes, IA centrada no humano, IA generativa

MATOS, E. J.; BERTONCINI, A. L. C.; AMES, M. C. F. D. C.; SERAFIM, M. C. A (falta da) ética na inteligência artificial generativa no ensino e pesquisa em Administração. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 25, n. 6, p. 0-0, 2024.

Matos, E. J., Bertoncini, A. L. C., Ames, M. C. F. D. C., & Serafim, M. C. (2024). A (falta da) ética na inteligência artificial generativa no ensino e pesquisa em Administração. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 25(6), 0-0.

https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/78521/a--falta-da--etica-na-inteligencia-artificial-generativa-no-ensino-e-pesquisa-em-administracao/i/pt-br

Artigo

Português

Alshurafat, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Hamdan, A., Al-Dmour, A., & Ensour W. (2023). Factors affecting accounting students’ misuse of ChatGPT: An application of the fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2023-0182

Anshari, M., Hamdan, M., Ahmad, N., Ali, E., & Haidi, H. (2023). COVID-19, artificial intelligence, ethical challenges, and policy implications. AI & Society, 38(2), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01471-6

Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11456.001.0001

Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean Ethics. (Irwin, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.

Barros, A., Prasad, A., & Sliwa, M. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and academia: Implication for research, teaching and service. Management Learning, 54(5), 597–604. https://.doi.org/10.1177/13505076231201445

Bartneck, C., Lutge, C., Wagner, A., & Welsh, S. (2021). An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4

Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86, 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2

Bedeian, A. G., (2004). Peer review and the social construction of know­ ledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 198–216. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40214251

Bertoncini, A. L. C., & Serafim, M. C. (2023). Ethical content in artificial intelligence systems: A demand explained in three critical points. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1074787), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023. 1074787

Bhargava, V. R., & Velasqures, M. (2021). Ethics of the attention economy: The problem of social media addiction. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3), 321–359. https://doi.org/:10.1017/beq.2020.32

Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370

Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D. et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy.

Brandt, R. B. (1992). Morality, utilitarianism, and rights. Cambridge University Press.

Chavez, M. R., Butler, T., S., Rekawek, P., Heo, H., & Kinzler, W. L. (2023). Chat generative pre-trained transformer: Why we should embrace this technology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 228(6), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.010

Coeckelberg, M. (2020). AI Ethics. The MIT Press.

COPE. (2023). Authorship and AI tools [Statement]. COPE Position Statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/aiauthor Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02

Crisp, R. (Ed.), (2013). The Oxford handbook of the history of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dalalah, D., & Dalalah, O. M. A. (2023). The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.10082

Darwall, S. L. (Ed.), (2003). Deontology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 11–20.

Daza, M. T., & Ilozumba, U. J. (2022). A survey of AI ethics in business lite­ rature: Maps and trends between 2000 and 2021. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1042661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042661

Eisikovits, N., & Feldman, D. (2022). AI and phronesis. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 9(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2021-0026

Ferrero, I., Rocchi, M., Pellegrini, M. M., & Reichert, E. (2020). Practical wisdom: A virtue for leaders. Bringing together aquinas and authentic leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(S1), 84–98. https://doi. org/10.1111/beer.12298

Giarmoleo, F. V., Ferrero, I., Rocchi, M., & Pellegrini, M. (2024). What ethics can say on artificial intelligence: Insights from a systematic literature review. Business and Society Review, 129(2), 258–292. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/basr.12336

Goodin, R. E. (1990). Government House utilitarianism. In Allison, L. (Ed.), The utilitarian response: The contemporary viability of utilitarian political philosophy (pp. 60–80). Sage Publications.

Hagendorff, T. (2022). A virtue-based framework to support putting AI ethics into practice. Philosophy & Technology, 35(55), 2–24. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13347-022-00553-z

Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 31(7l), 32S–43S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539519860730

Hartman, E. (2017). Aristotle’s virtue ethics and virtuous business. In Sison, A. J. G., Beabout, G., & Ferrero, I. (Eds.), Handbook on Virtue Ethics in Business and Management (pp. 3–12). Springer. The (lack of) ethics at generative AI in Business Management education and research

Hicks, S. K. (2023). Bracing for the future: Student usage of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Policy Science, 31, 51–60.

Hill Jr., T. E. (Ed.), (2009). The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hooker, J., & Kim, T. W. (2019). Ethical implications of the fourth industrial revolution for business and society. Business Ethics, 3, 35–63. https://doi. org/ 10.1108/s2514-175920190000003002

Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2023). Virtue ethics, the stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Zalta, E. N., & Nodelman, U. (Eds.), Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue/. Accessed on Oct. 10th, 2024.

Kavanagh, D. (2013). Problematizing practice: MacIntyre and management. Organization, 20(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050841246 0994

Kraut, R. (2009). Aristóteles: A ética a nicômaco. (1st ed.). (A. Storck, Trans.). Artmed.

Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: AI-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750

Melé, D., & Cantón, C. G. (2014). Human foundations of management: Understanding the Homo Humanus. Palgrave Macmillan.

Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2015). Principais itens para relatar revisões e meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 24(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742015000200017

Mulgan, T. (2012). Utilitarismo. (F. Creder, Trans.). Editora Vozes.

Pettit, P. (1997). The Consequentialist Perspective. In Baron, M., Pettit, P., & Slote, M. (Eds.), Three Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 92–174.

Polizzi, G., & Harrison, T. (2022). Wisdom in the digital age: A conceptual and practical framework for understanding and cultivating cyber wisdom. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(16), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10676-022-09640-3

Rane, N. (2024). Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through ChatGPT and similar large language models: Challenges, future prospects, and ethical considerations in education. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4599104

Ratten, V., & Jones, P. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT): Implications for management educators. International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100857

Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., & Al Halbusi, H. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT & Bard) in public administration research: A doubleedged sword for street-level bureaucracy studies. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2274801

Scarre, G. (1996). Utilitarianism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978 1003070962.

Schlagwein, D., & Willcocks, L. (2023). “ChatGPT et al.”: The ethics of using (generative) artificial intelligence in research and science. Journal of Information Technology, 38(3), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/026839 62231200411

Serafim, M. C., & Ames, M. C. F. D. C. (2023). Aportaciones de la antropología trascendental de Leonardo Polo a la ética de las virtudes neo-aristotélica en la ética empresarial. Revista de Estudios Filosóficos Polianos, 2, 99–117. https://revistaestudiosfilosoficospolianos.wordpress.com/2024/01/18/ numero-12-de-la-revista-estudios-filosoficos-polianos/

Singer, M. G. (1977). Actual consequence utilitarianism. Mind, 86(341), 67–77. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unav.es/10.1093/mind/LXXXVI.341.67

Sison, A. J. G., Beabout, G. R., & Ferrero, I. (Eds.), (2017). Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management. Springer.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Song, N. Y. (2024). Higher education crisis: Academic misconduct with generative AI. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12532

Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Springer.

Sweeney, S. (2023). Who wrote this? Essay mills and assessment – Conside­ rations regarding contract cheating and AI in higher education. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100818. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijme.2023.100818

Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press. ISSN 1678-6971 • RAM. Rev. Adm. Mackenzie, São Paulo, 25(6), eRAMD240061, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMD240061 The (lack of) ethics at generative AI in Business Management education and research

Vecchiarini, M., & Somià, T. (2023). Redefining entrepreneurship education in the age of artificial intelligence: An explorative analysis. International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijme.2023.100879

Williams, B. (1993). Morality: An introduction to ethics. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 48-54.

Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., & Westhorp, G. et al (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11, 20. https://doi. org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20

Zagzebski, L. (2023). Virtue Ethics. Think, 22(63), 15–21. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1477175622000252