Is replacing standard investments with ESG substitutes a good choice? Other Languages

ID:
70945
Abstract:
We compare traditional portfolio selection strategies with traditional stock market indexes in their standard and ESG versions. In addition to the comparison of 12 indexes from different markets in their ESG and standard versions. To compare the port folios we use conventional performance measures, and the results show that replacing the indexes with their ESG versions does not detract from performance in terms of the Shape ratio and other measures. In general, there is no statistically significant difference between the returns of the indexes and the portfolios built with these indexes compared to those using the standard versions. So that the investor concerned with environmental and social issues can replace their equity market investments with ESG assets without harming their financial performance.
ABNT Citation:
TAVARES, R. S.; CALDEIRA, J. F. Is replacing standard investments with ESG substitutes a good choice?. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, v. 21, n. 1, p. 49-75, 2023.
APA Citation:
Tavares, R. S., & Caldeira, J. F. (2023). Is replacing standard investments with ESG substitutes a good choice?. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 21(1), 49-75.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12660/rbfin.v21n1.2023.88364
Permalink:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/70945/is-replacing-standard-investments-with-esg-substitutes-a-good-choice-/i/en
Document type:
Artigo
Language:
Inglês
References:
Aouadi, A. and Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data, Journal of Business Ethics 151(4): 1027–1047.

Auer, B. R. and Schuhmacher, F. (2016). Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 59: 51–62.

Best, M. J. and Grauer, R. R. (1991). On the sensitivity of mean-varianceefficient portfolios to changes in asset means: Some analytical and computational results, The review of financial studies 4(2): 315–342.

Clarke, R., de Silva, H. and Thorley, S. (2011). Minimum-variance portfolio composition, Journal of Portfolio Management 37(2): 31.

Clementino, E. and Perkins, R. (2021). How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy, Journal of Business Ethics 171(2): 379–397.

Cochrane, J. H. (2009). Asset Pricing:(Revised Edition), Princeton University Press.

Consolandi, C., Eccles, R. G. and Gabbi, G. (2020). How material is a material issue? Stock returns and the financial relevance and financial intensity of ESG materiality, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment pp. 1–24.

DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy?, Review of Financial Studies 22(5): 1915–1953.

Duque-Grisales, E. and Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack, Journal of Business Ethics 168(2): 315–334.

Edmans, A. (2012). The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4): 1–19.

Fleming, J., Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B. (2001). The economic value of volatility timing, The Journal of Finance 56(1): 329–352.

Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L. and ElAlfy, A. (2020). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment pp. 1–7.

Halbritter, G. and Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility Where are they? A critical review of ESG investing, Review of Financial Economics 26: 25–35.

Hübel, B. and Scholz, H. (2020). Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: The role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings, Journal of Asset Management 21(1): 52–69.

Kajtazi, A. and Moro, A. (2019). The role of bitcoin in well diversified portfolios: A comparative global study, International Review of Financial Analysis 61: 143–157.

Keating, C. and Shadwick, W. F. (2002). A universal performance measure, Journal of Performance Measurement 6(3): 59–84.

Khan, M. (2019). Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world, Financial Analysts Journal 75(4): 103–123.

Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B. (2012). It’s all in the timing: Simple active portfolio strategies that outperform naive diversification, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 47(2): 437–467.

Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M. (2008). Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio, Journal of Empirical Finance 15(5): 850–859.

Lo, A. W. (2002). The Statistics of Sharpe Ratios, Financial Analysts Journal 58(4): 36–52.

Naffa, H. and Fain, M. (2022). A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards, Finance Research Letters 44: 102073.

Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S. and Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier, Journal of Financial Economics 142(2): 572–597.

Shanaev, S. and Ghimire, B. (2021). When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns, Finance Research Letters p. 102302.

Sortino, F. A. and Van Der Meer, R. (1991). Downside risk, Journal of Portfolio Management 17(4): 27.

Tavares, R. d. S., Caldeira, J. F. and Raimundo Júnior, G. d. S. (2022). It’s all in the timing again: Simple active portfolio strategies that outperform naïve diversification in the cryptocurrency market, Applied Economics Letters 29(2): 118–122.