66445

José Augusto L. Figueiredo
Paula Chimenti
Flávia Cavazotte
Daniel Abelha

Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios

Objetivo – Neste estudo, revisamos dez anos de pesquisas que investigaram as conexões entre liderança, criatividade e inovação (L-C/I). Nosso principal objetivo é realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura para melhor compreender as associações entre liderança e inovação/criatividade, analisando o conhecimento até então desenvolvido para abordar os mecanismos pelos quais os dois fenômenos estão conectados. Referencial teórico – Apresentamos e analisamos as definições conceituais dos três construtos envolvidos em nossa revisão – liderança, criatividade e inovação. Também destacamos brevemente as principais teorias e perspectivas da liderança, seus elementos-chave conceituais e sua interface com a criatividade/inovação. Metodologia – Aplicamos uma combinação de metodologias sistemáticas e narrativas de revisão com bibliometria, sem precedentes em seu foco, profundidade e amplitude. Investigamos uma amostra de 2.724 artigos publicados sobre as interseções entre L-C/I, analisando em profundidade 113 artigos publicados nas 27 principais revistas de administração. Resultados – Observamos um crescimento acelerado nas pesquisas sobre o tema. A maioria dos estudos aborda os efeitos da liderança na criatividade, ao passo que suas conexões com a inovação ainda precisam ser mais bem compreendidas. A liderança transformacional é a principal perspectiva dos pesquisadores, com o surgimento de estudos que aplicam abordagens da teoria da troca líder-membro (LMX, leader-member exchange), de empreendedorismo e de liderança positiva. Embora alguns mediadores e moderadores tenham sido explorados, permanece a necessidade de construir estruturas abrangentes capazes de lidar com a complexidade da questão. Os projetos de estudo transversais predominam e os poucos estudos experimentais dependem principalmente de amostras de alunos. Implicações práticas e sociais da pesquisa – Discutimos as possibilidades e limitações do conhecimento atual, sintetizamos lacunas existentes na pesquisa e oferecemos orientação para expandir ainda mais as fronteiras do conhecimento. Contribuímos também para fomentar estudos mais sistemáticos que evitem redundâncias e proliferação desenfreada de construtos e promovam a robustez teórica e metodológica que a área merece. Contribuições – O estudo aplica uma combinação de metodologias de revisão sistemática e narrativa com bibliometria, únicas em seu foco, profundidade e amplitude, oferecendo assim uma contribuição diferenciada e consolidando pesquisas com abordagens variadas, enquanto identifica lacunas para inspirar pesquisas futuras que podem trazer impulso no campo.

Criatividade, Inovação, Liderança, Revisão de literatura

FIGUEIREDO, J. A.; CHIMENTI, P.; CAVAZOTTE, F.; ABELHA, D. Uma década de pesquisas sobre liderança e seus efeitos na criatividade-inovação: uma revisão sistemática e narrativa da literatura. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, v. 24, n. 1, p. 66-91, 2022.

Figueiredo, J. A., Chimenti, P., Cavazotte, F., & Abelha, D. (2022). Uma década de pesquisas sobre liderança e seus efeitos na criatividade-inovação: uma revisão sistemática e narrativa da literatura. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24(1), 66-91.

https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i1.4151

https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/66445/uma-decada-de-pesquisas-sobre-lideranca-e-seus-efeitos-na-criatividade-inovacao--uma-revisao-sistematica-e-narrativa-da-literatura/i/pt-br

Artigo

Português

AMABILE, T., BARSADE, S., MUELLER, J., & STAW, B. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367

ANDERSON, N., DE DREU, C., & NIJSTAD, B. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.236

ANDERSON, N., POTOČNIK, K., & ZHOU, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128

ANTONAKIS, J. (2017). Editorial: The future of the Leadership Quarterly. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 1–4. Retrived from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_9E1C9DA5AAD5.P001/REF.pdf

ANTONAKIS, J., BENDAHAN, S., JACQUART, P., & LALIVE, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1082–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010

ANTONAKIS, J., BENDAHAN, S., JACQUART, P., & LALIVE, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In D. V. Day (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 93–117). New York: Oxford University Press.

ANTONAKIS, J. & DAY, D. V. (2017). The Nature of Leadership (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

BARON, R. A., & TANG, J. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.002

BAUMEISTER, R., VOHS, K., & FUNDER, D. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x

CAMISON-ZORNOZA, C., LAPIEDRA-ALCAMI, R., SEGARRA-CIPRES, M. and BORONAT-NAVARRO, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040039

DINH, J. E., LORD, R. G., GARDNER, W. L., MEUSER, J. D., LIDEN, R. C., & HU, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005

FISCHER, T., DIETZ, J., & ANTONAKIS, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830

GARDNER, W. L., LOWE, K. B., MEUSER, J. D., NOGHANI, F., GULLIFOR, D. P., & COGLISER, C. C. (2020). The leadership trilogy: A review of the third decade of The Leadership Quarterly. Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101379

GEORGE, J., & ZHOU, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687–697. doi: 10.1037/00219010.87.4.687

GUMUSLUOGLU, L., & ILSEV, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032

HAMILTON, B. H., & NICKERSON, J. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127003001001218

HANSEN, S. O., & WAKONEN, J. (1997). Innovation, a winning solution? International Journal of Technology Management, 13, 345–358. Recuperado de https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJTM.1997.001668

HARVEY, S., & KOU, C. Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213498591

HAUSER, O. P., LINOS, E., & ROGERS, T. (2017). Innovation with field experiments: Studying organizational behaviors in actual organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.004

HENNESSEY, B. A., & AMABILE, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416

HOBDAY, M. (2005). Firm-level innovation models: Perspectives on research in developed and developing countries. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17, 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500088666

ISMAIL, S., MALONE, M. S., & VAN GEEST, Y. (2015). Organizações Exponenciais. S.L.: HSM.

KLEIN, K. J. & KNIGHT, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00373.x

LANSISALMI, H., KIVIMAKI, M., AALTO, P., & RUORANEN, R. (2006). Innovation in healthcare: A systematic review of recent research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318405284129

LEE, A., WILLIS, S., & TIAN, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220

LORD, R. G., DAY, D. V., ZACCARO, S. J., AVOLIO, B. J., & EAGLY, A. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000089

MADJAR, N., OLDHAM, G. R., & PRATT, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069309

MARQUES, T., REIS, N., & GOMES, J. F. S. (2018). Responsible leadership research: A bibliometric review. BAR Brazilian Administration Review, 15(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2018170112

MARTIN, R., THOMAS, G., GUILLAUME, Y., LEE, A., & EPITROPAKI, O. (2016). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69, 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100

MEUSER, J. D., GARDNER, W. L., DINH, J. E., HU, J., LIDEN, R. C., & LORD, R. G. (2016). A network analysis of leadership theory: The infancy of integration. Journal of Management Official Journal of the Southern Management Association, 42(5), 1374–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647099

MUMFORD, M. D., SCOTT, G. M., GADDIS, B., & STRANGE, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3

NARAYANDAS, D., & MOLDOVEANU, M. (2019). The future of leadership development. Harvard Business Review 97, (4), 40–48. Recuperado de https://hbr.org/2019/03/the-future-of-leadership-development

NG, T. W. H. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.008

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Paris: OCDE Publishing. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1787/1ee231e0-en.

PITTAWAY, L., ROBERTSON, M., MUNIR, K., DENYER, D., & NEELY, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3-4), 137–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x

RANK, J., PACE, V., & FRESE, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00185.x

REITER-PALMON, R., & ILLIES, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005

SCHEEPERS, C.B. and STORM, C.P. (2019). Authentic leadership’s influence on ambidexterity with mediators in the South African context. European Business Review, 31(3), 352-378. Doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2017-0207

SETHIBE, T., & STEYN, R. (2016). Innovation and organizational performance: A critical review of the instruments used to measure organizational performance. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v8i1.50

SHALLEY, C. E., & GILSON, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004

SHALLEY, C. E., & ZHOU, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou, & C. E. Shalley (Eds.). Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 95–123). New York: Taylor and Francis.

SHIN, S. J. (2015). Leadership and creativity: The mechanism perspective. In C. S. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 17–30). England: Oxford University Press.

SHIN, S. J., & ZHOU, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709–1721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709

TIERNEY, P. (2008). Leadership and employee creativity. In J. Zhou, & C. E. Shalley (Eds.). Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 95–123). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

VAN KNIPPENBERG, D., & SITKIN, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.759433

WANG, D., XUE, H., & SU, H. (2010). Influence of work support on employee creativity: An empirical examination in the People’s Republic of China. African Journal of Business Management, 4(8), 1546–1553. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000349

YOSHIDA, D. T., SENDJAYA, S., HIRST, G., & COOPER, B. (2014). Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1395–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.013

ZHAO, H., & LI, C. (2019). A computerized approach to understanding leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.06.001

ZHOU, J., & SHALLEY, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 165–217.

ZHOU, J., & SHALLEY, C. E. (2010). Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace. In S. Zedeck, H. Aguinis, W. Cascio, M. Gelfand, K. Leung, S. Parker & J. Zhou (Eds.), APA handbook of industrial–organizational psychology (vol. 1, pp. 275-302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

ZHOU, J., & SHALLEY, C. E. (2011). Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 1, pp. 275-302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.