What Makes an Article be More Cited? Other Languages

ID:
58350
ABNT Citation:
MENDES-DA-SILVA, W.O Que Faz um Artigo ser Mais Citado?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 24, n. 6, p. 507-513, 2020.
APA Citation:
Mendes-da-silva, W.(2020). O Que Faz um Artigo ser Mais Citado?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(6), 507-513.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2020200167
Permalink:
https://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/58350/what-makes-an-article-be-more-cited--/i/en
Document type:
Editorial
Language:
Português
References:
Bethard, S.; Jurafsky, D. (2010, October). Who should I cite?Learning literature search models from citation behavior. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 19. https:// doi.org/10.1145/1871437.1871517

Duflo, E. (2019). Report of the editor: American Economic Review. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 612-626. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.109.612

Garcia, D.; Gattaz, C.; Gattaz, N. (2019). The relevance of title, abstract and keywords for scientific paper writing. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 23(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019190178

Garfield, E. (1955) Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108

Gargouri, Y.; Hajjem, C.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Carr, L.; Brody, T.; Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636

Hall, C. M.; Page, S. J. (2015). Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance? Tourism Management, 51, 309-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.013

Hargens, L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review, 53(1), 139-151. https://doi.org//10.2307/2095739

Jacques, T. S.; Sebire, N. J. (2010). The impact of article titles on citation hits: An analysis of general and specialist medical journals. Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2009.100020

Jacso, P. (2006). Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review, 30(3), 297-309. https:// doi.org/10.1108/14684520610675816

Kovacs, J. (2013). Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications?How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(8), 509-512. https://doi. org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100568

Kurtz, M. J.; Henneken, E. A. (2007). Open Access does not increase citations for research articles from The Astrophysical Journal. ArXiv, 0709.0896. http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0896

Lee, H. A.; Law, R.; Ladkin, A. (2014). What makes an article citable? Current Issues in Tourism, 17(5), 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.810611

Martins, H. C. (2020). Checklist evaluation for tutorialarticles: Clean code. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3785747

McGrail, M. R.; Rickard, C. M.; Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 19-35. https://doi. org/10.1080/07294360500453053

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2018). Promoção de transparência e impacto da pesquisa em negócios. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(4), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018180210

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2018). Reconhecimento da contribuição do avaliador anônimo. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(5), 1-13. https://doi. org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018180281

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2019). Revisão pelos pares aberta e ciência aberta na comunidade de pesquisa em negócios. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 23(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019190278

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2019). Revisão pelos pares aberta e ciência aberta na comunidade de pesquisa em negócios, VIII reunião anual do programa SciELO - Painel alinhamento dos periódicos SciELO Brasil com as boas práticas da ciência aberta. Zenodo. https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3572954

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2020). Lições que podem ser aprendidas da rejeição de um artigo. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(4), 369-375. https://doi. org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2020200069

Pulido, C. M.; Redondo-Sama, G.; Sordé-Martí, T.; Flecha, R. (2018). Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0203117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203117

Rossoni, L. (2018). Editorial: Produtivismo e coautoria cerimonial. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 17(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2018ed2

Uzzi, B.; Mukherjee, S.; Stringer, M.; Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474

Yan, R.; Tang, J.; Liu, X.; Shan, D.; Li, X. (2011). Citation count prediction: Learning to estimate future citations for literature. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Glasgow Scotland, UK, 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063757